Oppivelvollisuuden laajentamisen toimeenpano: seurantasuunnitelma 2021–2024. Finland and compulsory education up to the age of 18

Authors

  • Alicia Sianes
  • Encarnación Sánchez Lissen Universidad de Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.40.2022.32488

Keywords:

Finland, compulsory education, early school dropout, upper secondary education

Abstract

Changes in the labour market, digital and technological models imposed on society, high numbers of school dropouts in some countries, as well as new qualifications and training skills make many governments consider the utility of extending compulsory education up to 18 years or not, at least as a prospective study. It is not a new measure in some counties, but in the case of Finland it is indeed, where the new age limit has already in place since August 2021, when the Ministry of Education and Culture and the Finnish National Agency for Education launched the Plan for the period 2021-2024, which aims at implementing this initiative. This way, Finland intends to increase young employability rates, their equality indicators, as well as their formative level and skills. Specifically, by the end of this cycle, in 2024, an evaluation has been scheduled to assess the impact of the reform.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Encarnación Sánchez Lissen, Universidad de Sevilla

Profesora Titular de Universidad

Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. Universidad de Sevilla

Dpto. Teoría e Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social

References

Cabus, S. J. y De Wittea, K. (2011). Does school time matter? On the impact of compulsory education age on school dropout. Economics of Education Review, 30, 1384-1398. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.003

CEDEFOP. (2016). Introduction. En CEDEFOP, Leaving education early: putting vocational education and training centre stage. Volume I: investigating causes and extent, (pp. 18-24). Publications Office. Cedefop research paper 57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/925693

Constitución de Finlandia [Const]. Art. 16. 11 de junio de 1999 (Finlandia). https://finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1999/es19990731.pdf

European Commission. (2020). Recommendation for a council recommendation on the 2020 National Reform Programme of Finland and delivering a Council opinion on the 2020 Stability Programme of Finland. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/2020-european-semester-csr-comm-recommendation-finland_en_0.pdf

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2021). Compulsory Education in Europe – 2021/22. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/compulsory-education-20212022_en

Feito Alonso, R. (2010). Escolaridad hasta los 18 años: elementos para un debate. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 397, 79-83.

Finland Today. (17 de octubre de 2020). Compulsory School Age Raised to 18; One of the Aims Is to Improve Employment Rate. Finland Today. https://finlandtoday.fi/compulsory-school-age-raised-to-18-one-of-the-aims-is-to-improve-employment-rate/

García Ruiz, M. J. (2011). Contrastes de las culturas escolares finlandesa y española. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 18, 157-202.

Hanushek, E. A. y Woessmann, L. (2015). The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. MIT Press.

Loi n° 2019-791 du 26 juillet 2019 pour une école de la confiance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000038829065/

Mackey, P. E. y Duncan, T. G. (2013). Does raising the state compulsory school attendance age achieve the intended outcomes? U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544499.pdf

Marqués, S. (23 de junio de 2020). Francisco López Rupérez: “Hagamos lo que ha hecho Portugal con su reforma curricular”. Magisnet. https://magisnet.com/2020/06/francisco-lopez-ruperez-imitemos-a-portugal-hagamos-para-la-reforma-curricular-lo-que-han-hecho-ellos/

Messacar, D. y Oreopoulos, P. (2013). Staying in School: A Proposal for Raising High-School Graduation Rates. Issues in Science and Technology, 29(2), 55-61. https://issues.org/derek-high-school-graduation-rates/

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2021). To All 9th grade students and their parents or guardians. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162875/MoEC_compulsory%20educaton.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Noonoo, S. (18 de junio de 2015). Why Scandinavian schools are superior (and what we can learn). eSchool News. https://www.eschoolnews.com/2015/06/18/scandinavian-schools-291/

OECD. (2018). Curriculum Flexibility and Autonomy in Portugal - an OECD review. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/Curriculum-Flexibility-and-Autonomy-in-Portugal-an-OECD-Review.pdf

OECD. (2020). Education policy Outlook Finland. https://www.oecd.org/education/policy-outlook/country-profile-Finland-2020.pdf

Resolución 2011/2088 [Parlamento Europeo]. En la que se aborda el abandono escolar prematuro (2011/2088(INI)). 1 de diciembre de 2011. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011IP0531&from=EN

Sahlberg, P. (2013). El cambio educativo en Finlandia ¿Qué puede aprender el mundo? Paidós.

Sanz, I. (Coord.) (2020). El capital humano en la economía digital. Papeles de Economía Española, 166, Introducción Editorial (pp. V-XVII).

Savvides, N., Milhano, S., Mangas, C., Freire, C. y Lopes, S. (2021). Failures’ in a failing education system: comparing structural and institutional risk factors to early leaving in England and Portugal, Journal of Education and Work, 34(7-8), 789-809. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2002831

Yle. (16 de diciembre de 2020). Finland extends compulsory schooling age to 18. Yle. https://yle.fi/news/3-11698978

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

Sianes, A., & Sánchez Lissen, E. (2021). Oppivelvollisuuden laajentamisen toimeenpano: seurantasuunnitelma 2021–2024. Finland and compulsory education up to the age of 18. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (40), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.40.2022.32488

Most read articles by the same author(s)