Integration of Technology and Postmodern Theories in Comparative Education: Challenges and Opportunities in Global Contexts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.46.2025.41864

Keywords:

Educational technology, Comparative education, Postmodernity, Digital divide, Comparative methodologies, Pedagogical innovation

Abstract

This study examines the impact of technology on comparative education from a postmodern perspective. A qualitative methodology based on case studies is used to analyze how digital tools and online learning platforms are transforming research methodologies and pedagogical approaches in different educational contexts. The results show that technology has facilitated access to comparative data, improved collaboration between researchers and teachers, and promoted new forms of participatory learning. However, significant challenges are also identified, such as the digital divide and the need for teacher training in technological competencies. The discussion focuses on the implications of these findings for educational practice and policy formulation, suggesting that appropriate integration of technology can enhance comparative education in the postmodern era. We conclude that although obstacles exist, technology offers unique opportunities to enrich comparative education and improve educational equity and quality globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Héctor Manuel Manzanilla-Granados, Escuela Superior de Cómputo del Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Profesor-investigador de la Escuela Superior de Cómputo del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN) (México). Doctor en Ciencias. Líneas de investigación: políticas y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en educación básica y superior; políticas para la innovación e inclusión desde una perspectiva comparada; software educativo. CE: hmanzanilla@ipn.mx. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-1853

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2007). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods. Springer.

Cabero-Almenara, J., Marimon-Martí, S., & Vásquez Peñafiel, C. (2022). Educational digital transformation: New technological challenges for competence development. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1057395

Coursera. (2024). Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/

Cowen, R. (2006). Acting comparatively upon the educational world: Puzzles and possibilities. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980600976155

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crossley, M., & Watson, K. (2003). Comparative and International Research in Education: Globalisation, Context and Difference. Routledge.

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dussel, I. (2020). Inés Dussel y su reflexión sobre los medios digitales en educación: “No podemos hablar de estos temas con ingenuidad”. Otras Voces en Educación. https://otrasvoceseneducacion.org/archivos/351394

EduCluster Finland. (2024). EduCluster Finland. https://educlusterfinland.fi/

eLearning Africa. (2024). eLearning Africa: The Pan-African Conference on Digital Learning, Training and Skills Development. https://www.elearning-africa.com/

Epstein, E. H. (2008). Setting the normative boundaries: Crucial epistemological benchmarks in comparative education. Comparative Education, 44(4), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060802481456

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.

García Aretio, L., Ruiz Corbella, M., & Domínguez Figaredo, D. (2007). De la educación a distancia a la educación virtual. Ariel.

Giroux, H. A. (2011). On Critical Pedagogy. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the "Net Generation". Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.

Howarth, D. (2005). Applying discourse theory: The method of articulation. In D. Howarth & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 316-349). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230523364_14

Khan Academy. (2024). Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/

Lloyd, M. (2021). Addressing digital divides in education: The 2024 NETP breakdown. Forward Edge. Retrieved from https://www.forward-edge.net/addressing-digital-divides-in-education-the-2024-netp-breakdown/

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

McKinsey & Company. (2023). New global data reveal education technology’s impact on learning. https://www.mckinsey.com

Ministry of Education Singapore. (2024). Learning Management System. https://www.learning.moe.edu.sg/

Navarrete Cazales, Z., & Manzanilla Granados, H. M. (2023). Una perspectiva sobre la inteligencia artificial en la educación. Perfiles Educativos, 45(Especial), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2023.Especial.61693

Navarrete, Zaira (2009) “Eclecticismo teórico en las ciencias sociales. El caso del Análisis Político de Discurso” en R. Soriano y D. Ávalos (Coords.) Análisis Político de Discurso: Dispositivos intelectuales en la investigación social, México: Juan Pablos editores / Programa de Análisis Político de Discurso e Investigación, PP. 139-151.

OECD. (2024). Education at a Glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/education-at-a-glance-2024_c00cad36-en.html

Sánchez García, A. M., & Carbajal Padilla, G. R. (2023). Impacto de las tecnologías emergentes en la educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, (32), 45-56.

Schriewer, J. (1989). La dualidad de la educación comparada: comparación intercultural y exteriorización a escala mundial. Revista Perspectivas, XIX(3), 415-433.

Schriewer, J. (1990). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodological criteria and sociological concepts. Current Sociology, 38(2), 23-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139290038002006

Secretaria da Educação do Estado de São Paulo. (2024). Portal da Secretaria da Educação do Estado de São Paulo. https://www.educacao.sp.gov.br

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(5), 713-723.

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & Piatigorsky, J. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings. Wiley.

UNESCO. (2023). Digital Learning and Transformation of Education. https://www.unesco.org

Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0063

Vázquez-Cano, E., & Sevillano-García, M. L. (Eds.). (2015). Dispositivos digitales móviles en Educación: El aprendizaje ubicuo. Narcea Ediciones.

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Navarrete-Cazales, Z., & Manzanilla-Granados, H. M. (2024). Integration of Technology and Postmodern Theories in Comparative Education: Challenges and Opportunities in Global Contexts. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (46), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.46.2025.41864