Engagement académico en estudiantes universitarios. El rol mediador del Capital Psicológico como recurso personal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.35847Palabras clave:
estudiantes universitarios, autocuidado, capital psicológico, engagement académicoAgencias Financiadoras:
Proyecto PROMETEO - Generalitat ValencianaResumen
La pandemia de COVID-19 ha provocado un deterioro de la calidad de vida y, en particular, de la salud mental de los estudiantes universitarios. Esto destaca la necesidad de ofrecer programas de afrontamiento y medidas preventivas de salud mental. La efectividad de los programas basados en el autocuidado para aumentar el bienestar en los estudiantes apenas ha sido estudiada, aunque se han encontrado efectos prometedores en algunos estudios en el contexto laboral (Gomez-Borges et al., 2022). En línea con la teoría JD-R conceptualizamos y examinamos empíricamente dos recursos, las actividades de autocuidado y el Capital Psicológico (PsyCap), como antecedentes del engagement académico como estado positivo de bienestar o realización. Estos recursos personales, el autocuidado y el PsyCap, pueden desempeñar un papel importante para afrontar situaciones exigentes como las que enfrentan los estudiantes universitarios en sus estudios, lo que puede contribuir a su bienestar. En base a ello, el propósito de este estudio ha sido analizar el papel mediador del PsyCap en la relación entre el autocuidado y el engagement académico. Los participantes fueron 397 estudiantes universitarios de dos universidades españolas (77,8% mujeres; edad media 26,08 años). Los datos se recogieron durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Utilizando modelos de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM), los resultados muestran relaciones positivas entre el autocuidado y el engagement académico, por un lado y entre PsyCap y engagement académico por otro. El modelo de mediación total ha obtenido mejor ajuste y resultados, destacando el papel mediador de PsyCap. En base a los resultados, se discute sobre la importancia de las actividades de autocuidado en los estudiantes universitarios y, sobre todo, implementar programas para desarrollar recursos personales como el PsyCap que potencian su efecto sobre el engagement académico.
Descargas
Citas
Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. https://bit.ly/3FDQxZS
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2011). Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.004
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Carmona–Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). How psychological capital mediates between study–related positive emotions and academic performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(2), 605- 617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9963-5
Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40, 2938-2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8
Colman, D. E., Echon, R., Lemay, M. S., McDonald, J., Smith, K. R., Spencer, J., & Swift, J. K. (2016). The efficacy of self-care for graduate students in professional psychology: A metaanalysis. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 10(4), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000130
Datu, J. A. D., King, R. B., & Valdez, J. P.M. (2016). Psychological capital bolsters motivation, engagement, and achievement: Cross–sectional and longitudinal studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology., 13, 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257056.
Depner, R. M., Cook-Cottone, C. P., & Kim, S. (2020). Structural relationship between mindful self-care, meaning made, and palliative worker’s quality of life. International Journal of Stress Management, 28(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000209
Fichman, M., & Cummings, J. N. (2003). Multiple imputation for missing data: Making the most of what you know. Organizational Research Methods, 6(3), 282-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103255532
Finney, S., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and Categorical data in structural equation modeling. En G. Hancock, & R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.
Fiodorova, A., & Farb, N. (2021). Brief daily self-care reflection for undergraduate well-being: a randomized control trial of an online intervention. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2021.1949000
Garland, E. L., Kiken, L. G., Faurot, K., Palsson, O., & Gaylord, S. A. (2017). Upward spirals of mindfulness and reappraisal: Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory with autoregressive latent trajectory modeling. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9768-y
Gomez-Borges, A., Peláez-Zuberbuhler, M. J., Martínez, I. M., & Salanova, M. (2022). Self-Care at work matters: How job and personal resources mediate between self-care and psychological well-being. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 38(3), 231-239. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a15
Heitzman, J. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. Psychiatric Polska, 54(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/120373
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hussain, M., Mirza T., & Hassan M. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the human behavior. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 5, 35-61. http://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2020.05.05
Kline, R. B. (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Loscalzo, Y., & Giannini, M. (2018). Study engagement in Italian university students: a confirmatory factor analysis of the trecht work engagement scale– student version. Social Indicators Research, 142, 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1943-y
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. J. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro–intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373
Luthans, F., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press.
Martinez, I. M., Meneghel, I., Carmona–Halty, M., & Youssef-Morgan, C. (2019a). Adaptation and validation to Spanish of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire–12 (PCQ–12) in academic contexts. Current Psychology, 40, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00276-z
Martínez, I. M., Youssef-Morgan, C., Chambel, M. J. & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019b). Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1047-1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382
Myers, S. B., Sweeney, A. C., Popick, V., Wesley, K., Bordfeld, A., & Fingerhut, R. (2012). Self- care practices and perceived stress levels among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026534
Nunes, M., Walker, J. R., Syed, T., De Jong, M., Stewart, D. W., Provencher, M. D., Swinson, R. P., Ferrari, J., Furer, P., & The Mobilizing Minds Research Group. (2014). A national survey of student extended health insurance programs in postsecondary institutions in Canada: Limited support for students with mental health problems. Canadian Psychology, 55(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036476
Ortega-Maldonado, A., Llorens, S., Acosta, H., & Coo, C. (2017). Face-to-face vs on-line: An analysis of profile, learning, performance and satisfaction among post graduate students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1701-1706.https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051005
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rosiek, A., Rosiek-Kryszewska, A., Leksowski, Ł., & Leksowski, K. (2016). Chronic stress and suicidal thinking among medical students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020212
Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J., & Martínez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra-role performance: the mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2256-2266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05652.x
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: the mediating role of study burn out and engagement. Anxiety Stress Coping, 23, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965
San Román-Niaves, M., Coo, C., Llorens, S., Salanova, M. (2022). The mediating role of compassion between social job resources, and healthy healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study with gender perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Artículo 7500. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127500
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Marques–Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. (2002a). Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross–national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzales–Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002b). The measurement of engagement and burn out: a two–sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schaufeli, W., Bakker, A., & Salanova, M. (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schmider, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L., & Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology, 6(4), 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
Soper, D. S. (2023). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. http://bit.ly/3TEq6sP
Van Woerkom, M. (2021). Building positive organizations: A typology of positive psychology interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769782
Vanno, V., Kaemkate, W., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Relationships between academic performance, perceived group psychological capital and positive psychological capital of Thai undergraduate students. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3226–3230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.739
Vink, J., Ouweneel, E., & le Blanc, P. (2011) Psychological resources for engaged employees: Psychological capital in the job demands-resources model. Gedrag en Organisatie, 24, 101–120.
Winerman, L. (2019). By the numbers: An alarming rise in suicide. American Psychological Association, 50(1), 80. https://bit.ly/3nair9x
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Demerouti, E, & Schaufeli, W. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121– 141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121

Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.