Intellectual enthusiasm, a playground, God’s work: understanding contractors' rationales in International Large-Scale Assessment (ILSA) contracts

Camilla Addey

doi:10.5944/reec.42.2023.34345

Auteurs-es

Camilla Addey Autonomous University of Barcelona https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8431-5568

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.34345

Mots-clés :

Evaluaciones de aprendizaje, contratos de ILSA, préstamo de políticas, etnografía de redes, OCDE, IEA, ILSA

Résumé

Why are contractors keen to develop, implement, and analyse International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) when they appear to make no financial gains? What makes ILSA contracts so attractive? This paper takes as its starting point the fact that almost all ILSA contractors interviewed stated their ILSA work is an investment, either in the form of a break-even or a loss contract. Applying policy borrowing and lending theory to non-state actors, and analysing 35 interviews with OECD and IEA staff and ILSA contractors, the paper discusses why contractors carry out ILSA contracts or donate to ILSAs. Rationales relate to interests in methodological developments and innovation; research; social responsibility; learning; exposure; prestige; credibility; networks; business opportunities; and individual rationales. The paper identifies parallels with the motives of corporate philanthropy in education. The paper concludes that ILSA contractors are using ILSAs to forward their political agendas, which include growing the learning assessment market.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Camilla Addey, Autonomous University of Barcelona

Camilla Addey es becaria Marie Curie en GEPS, el centro de investigación sobre Globalización, Educación y Políticas Sociales del Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, España. Anteriormente, Camilla fue profesora de Educación Comparada e Internacional en Teachers College, Universidad de Columbia (EE. UU.) e investigadora en la Universidad Humboldt de Berlín (Alemania). Ha publicado en Comparative Education; Globalización, Sociedades y Educación; Compare: una revista de educación comparada e internacional; Estudios Críticos en Educación; y Evaluación en Educación: Principios, Política y Práctica.

Références

Addey, C. (2019). The appeal of PISA for Development in Ecuador and Paraguay: Theorising and applying the global ritual of belonging. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(8), 1159-1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1623653

Addey, C., y Sellar. S. E. (2019). Is it worth it? Rationales for (Non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. Education Research and Foresight Working Papers Series, 24. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/node/268820

Addey, C. y Sellar, S. E. (2020). The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation, en B. Lingard (Ed), Globalisation and Education (PP. 160 – 178). Routledge.

Addey, C., Sellar S., Steiner-Khamsi G., Lingard B. y Antoni Verger. (2017). The rise of international large-scale assessments and rationales for participation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47 (3), 434–452, DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2017.1301399

Addey, C. (2015). International literacy assessments in Lao PDR and Mongolia: a global ritual of belonging, En Hamilton M., Maddox B., Addey, C. (Eds). 2015. Literacy as Numbers: Researching the Politics and Practices of International Literacy Assessment (pp. 147 – 164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Avelar, M y Ball S. (2019). Mapping new philanthropy and the heterarchical state: The Mobilization for the National Learning Standards in Brazil. International Journal of Educational Development. 64 (January 2019), 65-73. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.09.007

Ball, S. (2012). Global Education Inc. Oxon, Routledge.

Ball, S. (2016). Following policy: networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy 31(5), 549-566.

Beckert, J. (2002). Beyond the Market. Princeton University Press.

Beckert, J. (2009). The Social Order of Markets. Theory and Society, 38 (3), 245–269.

Bishop, M. y Green, M. (2010). Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.

Powell D. (2018). The ‘will to give’: corporations, philanthropy and schools, Journal of Education Policy, 34 (2), 195-214, DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2018.1424940

Dennis, B. Buchholtz, A., Butts M. (2009). The Nature of Giving. A Theory of Planned Behavior Examination of Corporate Philanthropy. Business & Society. 48 (3), 360-384.

Edwards, M. 2008. Just Another Emperor? The Myths and Realities of Philanthrocapitalism. Demos and The Young Foundation.

Fejerskov, Adam Moe. (2017). The New Technopolitics of Development and the Global South as a Laboratory of Technological Experimentation. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 42(5), 947-968. DOI: 10.1177/0162243917709934

Hogan, A. et al. (2015). Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 1-16.

King, S. (2006). Pink Ribbons Inc: Breast Cancer and the Politics of Philanthropy. University of Minnesota Press.

Komljenovic J. y Robertson S. L. (2017) Making global education markets and trade. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 289-295.

Liu, J. y Steiner-Khasmi G., 2021. Reasons for Participation in International Large-Scale Assessments. En T. Nilsen et al. (Eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Large-Scale Studies in Education, Springer International Handbooks of Education (pp. 1– 19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38298-8_5-1

Lubienski, C. (2016). Sector distinctions and the privatization of public education policymaking. Theory and Research in Education, 14(2), 193–212. DOI: 10.1177/1477878516635332

Lubienski, C. (2018). The critical challenge: Policy networks and market models for education. Policy Futures in Education, 16(2) 156–168. DOI: 10.1177/1478210317751275

Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on Self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

Molnar, A. (2005). School Commercialism: From Democratic Ideal to Market Commodity. Routledge.

Reckhow, S. y Snyder, J.W. (2014). The expanding role of philanthropy in education politics. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 186–195.

Ricks, J. M. y Williams, J. A. (2005). Strategic Corporate Philanthropy: Addressing Frontline Talent Needs Through an Educational Giving Program. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(2), 147-157, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1175-3.

Sabatier, P. A., y C. M. Weible. (2007). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Classification.” En Theories of the Policy Process, editado por Paul A. Sabatier, 189–220. Boulder, CO.Westview.

Saiia, D. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate philanthropy: Strategic philanthropy is good corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(2), 1-19

Saiia, D., A. Carrol, A., Buchholtz. (2003). Philanthropy as Strategy. When Corporate Charity “Begins at Home”. Business and Society, 42(2), 169-201.

Saltman, K. (2010). The gift of education: Public education and venture philanthropy. Springer.

Schriewer, J. (1990). The Method of Comparison and the Need for Externalization: Methodological Criteria and Sociological Concepts. En Theories and Methods in Comparative Education, editado por J. Schriewer, en cooperación con B. Holmes, 3–52. Lang.

Sellar, S. (2017) Making network markets in education: the development of data infrastructure in Australian schooling. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 341 351, DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2017.1330137

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2017). Focusing on the Local to Understand Why the Global Resonates and How Governments Appropriate ILSAs for National Agenda Setting. En The Rise of International Large-Scale Assessments and Rationales for Participation, editado por C. Addey, S. Sellar, G. Steiner-Khamsi, B. Lingard y A. Verger. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 47 (3): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03057925.2017.1301399.

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2010). The Politics and Economics of Comparison. Comparative Education Review, 54 (3), 323-342.

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Cross-national policy borrowing: understanding reception and translation, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 153-167, DOI:10.1080/02188791.2013.875649

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2015). Standards are good (for) business: standardised comparison and the private sector in education, Globalisation, Societies and Education, DOI: 10.1080/14767724.2015.1014883

Steiner-Khamsi, G. y Stolpe I. (2006). Educational Import, Local Encounters with Global Forces in Mongolia. Palgrave Macmillan.

Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.

Verger, A. et al. (2016). The Emergence and Structuring of the Global Education Industry: Towards an Analytical Framework. World Yearbook of Education 2016: The Global Education Industry (pp. 3 – 24). En A. Verger, C. Lubienski y G. Steiner-Khamsi. Routledge.

Waldow, Florian. 2012. ‘’Standardization and Legitimacy: Two central concepts in research on educational borrowing and lending.’’ En World Yearbook in Education 2012. Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education (pp. 411 – 428), editado por Steiner-Khamsi G. y Waldow F. New York: Routledge.