Transit of the gaze towards “the future” of comparative education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.46.2025.40704Keywords:
modernism, postmodernism, postcolonialism, decoloniality, Comparative educationAbstract
It is recognized that the field of comparative education needs to look towards its "the future". However, the gaze towards “the future” of comparative education seems to be spinning all over the place, dispersed, without organization. This paper tries to contribute to the organization of the gaze to determine which space is being looked at to find “the future” of comparative education, and what is possible to find in that space. This paper analyzes the transit of thought through different spaces in order to look to "the future" of comparative education, moving through a modern view, a postmodern view, a postcolonial view and a cosmopolitan view. It is identified that the modern view is an appreciative view of the historical and contemporary evolution of comparative education, and it is argued that this is a view whose certainty prevents the field of comparative education from renewing itself. With a postmodern view towards "the future" of comparative education, this paper identifies improvements in the field of comparative education in terms of the construction of a more informed version of comparative education by including the silences that the field has left in its wake, and it is argued that the postmodern view is limited and limiting because it still transmits a logic of coloniality. With the postcolonial view towards "the future" of comparative education, the analysis focuses on the space towards which the field should look for its decoloniality, and analyzes the gestures that comparativists should practice for the elimination of coloniality. The paper concludes with a cosmopolitan look at "the future" of comparative education, in a space free of coloniality. It is argued that it is in this cosmopolitan space in which "the future" of comparative education lies, which is its potential to transform through a closer approach and understanding.
Downloads
References
Caputo, J. D. (1997). Deconstruction in a nutshell: A conversation with Jacques derrida. Fordham University Press.
Castro-Gómez, S. (2007). Decolonizar la universidad. La hybris del punto cero y el diálogo de saberes. El Giro Decolonial. Reflexiones Para Una Diversidad Epistémica Más Allá Del Capitalismo Global. Siglo del Hombre Editores. 79-91.
Chen, K. (2010). Asia as method: Toward Deimperialization. Duke University Press, 1-257.
Cowen, R. (2023). Comparative education: And now? Comparative Education, 59(3), 326-340.
Díez-Gutiérrez, E., & Jarquín-Ramírez, M. (2023). Desobediencia epistémica anticolonial en el sistema educativo: Michoacán y Oaxaca como experiencias de construcción educativa postcolonial en México. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (43), 137-157.
Dussel, E. (2019). World-system and" trans"-modernity. Unbecoming modern (pp. 221-244) Routledge.
García Garrido, J. L., & García Ruiz, M. J. (2006). Temas candentes de la educación en el siglo XXI. Revista de Educación Comparada, (12) 490-494.
García Ruiz, M. J. (2012). Impacto de la globalización y el postmodernismo en la epistemología de la educación comparada. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (20), 41-80.
Habermas, J. (2008). El resurgimiento de la religión, ¿un reto para la autocomprensión de la modernidad? Diánoia, 53(60), 3-20.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Londres, Reino Unido: Sage.
Kim, M. J. (2023). Time-worn pebbles or unpolished gemstones?(un) usable pasts and possible futures of comparative education. Comparative Education, 59(3), 475-484.
Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking. the rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality, and the grammar of de-coloniality. Taylor y Francis Online, 21(2-3), 449-514. doi:10.1080/09502380601162647
Nóvoa, A. (2021). The return of the comparativist: Estrangement, intercession and profanation. Identities and Education: Comparative Perspectives in Times of Crisis, 245-260.
Quijano, A. (2014). Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y américa latina. CLACSO. Vol. 13, 201 – 246.
Reimers, F. (2006). Citizenship, identity and education: Examining the public purposes of schools in an age of globalization. Prospects. Comparative Journal of Curriculum, Learning, and Assessment, 36(3), 275-294. doi:10.1007/s11125-006-0009-0
Rivas Flores, J. I., Calvo León, P., Leite Méndez, A. E., y Fernández Torres, P. (2023). La colonización de la formación del profesorado: A la conquista del alma docente. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (43), 121-136
Rodríguez Gómez, M.D. (2024). Desarrollo profesional postcolonial del docente: «giro decolonial» en el diseño de la formación del cuerpo docente para su propia decolonialidad. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (44), 399-416.
Rolfe, G. (2004). Deconstruction in a nutshell. Nursing Philosophy, 5(3), 274-276.
Takayama, K., Sriprakash, A., y Connell, R. (2017). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review. University of Chicago Press. 61(S1), S1-S24. doi:10.1086/690455
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.