Google in Latin America: corporate expansion and digital capitalism in education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.34322

Keywords:

Global Education Industry, EdTech, Google Classroom, Iberoamerica

Abstract

With the expansion of digital capitalism and as an effect of school closures due to the pandemic, the technology-based multinational corporations GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft) have consolidated their offer of educational services in the field of the Global Education Industry in Ibero-America. Of the group, Google has been a key player, by substantially increasing the number of users on its platforms through corporate strategies such as public-private partnerships, agreements with schools and teacher training. This article analyzes the strategies that this technological giant has promoted in a limited set of educational centers certified and "distinguished" by Google for Education, called Google Reference Schools located in Mexico and Spain. The pedagogical and political implications are analyzed. The research methodology uses the three-dimensional model of Critical Discourse Analysis applied to the reports produced by the reference schools themselves and hosted in the Google for Education directory. The results show the way in which Google is adopted in the educational centers as an option to underpin educational improvement but which also introduces forms of governance at a distance in the educational field. In the conclusions, we discuss whether placing the infrastructure of digital communication and interaction of educational centers in Iberoamerican schools in the hands of these new actors of the Global Educational Technology Industry means not only handing over power to a private actor with specific commercial and political objectives and interests, but also closing the doors to alternative ways of doing and knowing in education. As future lines of research, we consider that the analysis should be extended to other countries beyond the Ibero-American area.

Downloads

Author Biographies

Mauro Rafael Jarquín Ramírez, UNAM

Professor at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, of the National Autonomous University of Mexico. He has worked with educational groups and educational communities in the development and strengthening of alternative and democratic educational projects in different parts of Mexico. Member of the Editorial Committee of Intercambio Magazine, research body of the Social Network for Public Education in America (Red SEPA). His latest publication: The pedagogy of capital. Entrepreneurs, the new right and educational reform in Mexico (Akal, 2021). He does journalistic work related to politics and education in the newspaper La Jornada (Mexico) where he is a columnist in the Opinion section.

Enrique Javier Díez Gutiérrez

ENRIQUE JAVIER DÍEZ GUTIÉRREZ Profesor de la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad de León. ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-5318

Ha trabajado como educador social, maestro de primaria, profesor de secundaria, como orientador en institutos y responsable de atención a la diversidad en la administración educativa.

Director de la Investigación Europea Erasmus +, Jean Monnet Module, titulado "Building up an Inclusive and Democratic Europe through a Dialogical Co-Creation of Intercultural Solutions to the Rise of Neo-Fascism and Xenofobia".  EAC-A02-2019-JMO. Application 620320-EPP-1-2020-1-ES-EPPJMO-MODULE.

Entre sus últimas publicaciones se encuentran: Pedagogía Antifascista. Construir una educación inclusiva, democrática y del bien común frente al auge del fascismo y la xenofobia (Octaedro, 2022). La historia silenciada. Unidades Didácticas de Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica Democrática (Plaza y Valdés, 2022). Educación crítica e inclusiva para una sociedad poscapitalista (Octaedro, 2021). La asignatura pendiente. La memoria histórica en los libros de texto (Plaza y Valdés, 2020), La educación en venta (Octaedro, 2020), Educación para el bien común (Octaedro, 2020), La revuelta educativa neocon (Trea, 2019) o Neoliberalismo educativo (Octaedro, 2018).

Impulsor e integrante del colectivo de profesorado universitario Uni-Digna, por una Universidad al servicio del bien común y comprometida socialmente. Miembro del Foro de Sevilla, Por Otra política Educativa. Miembro de Redes por una Nueva Política Educativa, que agrupa a colectivos, movimientos, sindicatos, MRPs, federaciones de familias, partidos políticos, etc., que defienden una educación pública, laica y gratuita. Es también Vicepresidente del Foro por la Memoria de León que investiga, publica y trabaja en la recuperación de la memoria histórica y Secretario de la Asociación Prometeo, Hombres por la Igualdad de León, que promueve la implicación de los hombres en la lucha por la igualdad y contra la violencia de género.

References

Arantes, J. (2022). Personalization in Australian K-12 classrooms: how might digital teaching and learning tools produce intangible consequences for teachers’ workplace conditions? The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00530-7

Bacchi, C.L. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.

Boninger, F.; Molnar, A. & Saldaña, C. (2019). Personalized Learning and the Digital Privatization of Curriculum and Teaching. National Education Policy Center.

Bourdieu, P. (2008). ¿Qué significa hablar? Economía de los intercambios lingüísticos. Akal.

Carlsson, H. (2021). Bridging the gap between policy and practice: Unpacking the commercial rhetoric of Google for Education. European Educational Research Journal, 1474904121997213, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904121997213

Clark, D. (2011, September 8). Google discloses carbon footprint for the first time. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/sep/08/google-carbon-footprint

Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021) Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050

Díez-Gutiérrez, E. J. (2021). Gobernanza híbrida digital y Capitalismo EdTech: la crisis del COVID-19 como amenaza. Foro de Educación, 19(1), 105-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.860

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman.

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In: T. Van Dijk (Hg.): Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). Sage.

Foucault, M. (2007). Las palabras y las cosas. Siglo XXI.

Costello, K & Rimol, M. (2020, October 10). Gartner Says Worldwide PC Shipments Grew 3.6% in Third Quarter of 2020. Gartner. https://cutt.ly/ZL1vweO

Google México. (2014, Diciembre 5). Google for Education Mexico. [video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTK4smA6MnM

Gómez, H. (2015). Análisis crítico del discurso al campo del currículum de la formación inicial docente en Chile. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 41(1), 311-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052015000100018

Gordo, A., De Rivera, J. & Cassidy, P. (2017). La economía colaborativa y sus impactos sociales en la era del capitalismo digital. In R. Cotarelo & J. Gil, Ciberpolítica: gobierno abierto, redes, deliberación y democracia (pp.189-208). Gala.

Gulson, K.; Perrotta, C.; Williamson, B.; Witzenberger, K. (2021). Should We Be Worried about Google Classroom? The Pedagogy of Platforms in Education, Journal of Professional Learning

Habermas, J. (1989). Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa I - II. Taurus.

Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2019). Invisible Search and Online Search Engines: The Ubiquity of Search in Everyday Life. Routledge.

Han, B.C. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder. Herder

Hartmut, R. (2016). Alienación y aceleración. Hacia una teoría crítica de la temporalidad en la modernidad tardía. Katz Editores.

Hillis, K.; Petit, M. & Jarret, K. (2013) Google and the Culture of Search, Routledge.

Roberts-Mahoney, H.; Means, A. & Garrison, M. (2016). Netflixing human capital development: personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education, Journal of Education Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1132774

Hendricks, B. (2021, June 22). Collaboration and security in Google Workspace for Education, Google Blog. https://www.blog.google/outreach-initiatives/education/google-workspace-for-education-collaboration-and-security/

Ideland, M. (2021). Google and the end of the teacher? How a figuration of the teacher is produced through an ed-tech discourse. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1809452

Kraus, G., Formichella, M.M., & Alderete, M.V. (2019). El uso del Google Classroom como complemento de la capacitación presencial a docentes de nivel primario. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, (24), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.24.e09

Krien, A. (2020). The screens that ate school. The Monthly. https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2020/june/1590933600/anna-krien/screens-ate-school#mtr

Krutka, D.; Smits, R. & Willhelm, T. (2021). Don’t Be Evil: Should We Use Google in Schools? TechTrends, 65, 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00599-4

Laborinho, A.P. & Díaz, T. (Coords.). (2020). Competencias para el siglo XXI en Iberoamérica. Miradas sobre la educación en Iberoamérica. OEI.

Lawson, T. (2011). Empowerement in Education: Liberation, Governance or a Distraction? A Review. Power and Education, 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2011.3.2.89

Lindh, M., Nolin, J., & Hedvall, K. (2016). Pupils in the clouds: Implementation of Google Apps for Education. First Monday, 21. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i4.6185

Loredo, M. P., de Souza, B. D., da Silva, O., Lucchetti, A. L., & Lucchetti, G. (2018). The use of smartphones in different phases of medical school and its relationship to internet addiction and learning approaches. Journal of medical systems, 42(6), 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-0958-x

Marshall, T. (2020). How Google Classroom Erases Trans Students. Rethinking schools, 34, 4, 29-41.

Martínez, M., & Flax, R. (2020). Desalienar el ACD: una revisión de la noción de ideología para devolver la crítica marxista al análisis crítico del discurso. Pensamiento al margen, 12, 54-66.

Mason, P. (2016). Postcapitalismo: hacia un nuevo futuro. Paidós.

Moreno, E. (2016). El análisis crítico del discurso en el escenario educativo. Zona próxima, (25), 129-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.14482/zp.25.9799

Morozov, E. (2018). Capitalismo Big Tech: ¿Welfare o neofeudalismo digital? Enclave.

Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. University Press.

Pardo, N. G. (2012). Análisis crítico del discurso: Conceptualización y desarrollo. Cuadernos de lingüística hispánica, (19), 41-62.

Pardo Baldoví, M. I., Waliño-Guerrero, M. J., & San-Martín, Á. (2018). La “uberización” de los centros escolares: reorganización del trabajo pedagógico mediante las plataformas digitales de contenidos. Educatio Siglo XXI, 36(2), 187-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/j/333031

Pérez, E. (2022, julio 8). Google redobla su apuesta por la educación: hasta 100 TB para colegios, Classroom con extensiones y un asistente para cuando no esté el profesor. Xataca. https://cutt.ly/yLlcvmy

Saura, G., Díez-Gutiérrez, E.J., & Rivera Vargas, P. (2021). Innovación Tecno-Educativa “Google”. Plataformas Digitales, Datos y Formación Docente. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 19(4), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.007

Saldaña, C. M., Welner, K. G., Malcolm, S. & Tisch, E. (2019). Examining the New Phenomenon of Teachers as Brand Ambassadors. National Education Policy Center.

Sawers, P. (2022, July 18). Denmark bans Chromebooks and Google Workspace in schools over data transfer risks, TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/18/denmark-bans-chromebooks-and-google-workspace-in-schools-over-gdpr/

Selwyn, N. (2015). Minding our language: why education and technology is full of bullshit.. and what might be done about it. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 437-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523

Srnicek, N. (2018). Capitalismo de plataformas, Caja Negra Editora.

Sundin, O; Haider, J.; Anderson, C.; Carlsson, H. & Kjellbergs, S. (2017). The search-ification of everyday life and the mundan-inification of search, Journal of Documentation. DOI: 10.1108/JD-06-2016-0081

Svendsen, J. & Svendsen, A. (2021) Not for Free! An Analysis of Two Digital Tools Recommended as Learning Resources for Physical Education in Upper Secondary Schools in Denmark, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65:2, 331-344, DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2019.1705896

Tarango, J., Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D., & Refugio, J. (2019). Evaluación según diseño y aprendizaje de Google Classroom y Chamilo. IE Revista de Investigación Educativa de la REDIECH, 10(19), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.33010/ierierediech.v10i19.518

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2012). The Googlization of Everything (and Why We Should Worry). University of California Press.

Van Dijk, T. (1977). Texto y Contexto. Cátedra.

Van Dijk, T. (2011). Sociedad y discurso. Gedisa.

Verger, A.; Lubienski, C. & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016). World Yearbook of Education 2016. Routledge.

Watters, A. (2020). School Work and Surveillance. https://cutt.ly/EuSepGV

Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e)valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.17375 56

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Jarquín Ramírez, M. R., & Díez Gutiérrez, E. J. (2022). Google in Latin America: corporate expansion and digital capitalism in education. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (42), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.34322

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.