Algorithmic technopolitics and cosmo-diversity: a case study of digital governance and socio-technical imaginaries in Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.48.2025.45329Keywords:
Digital Governance, Socio-technical imaginaries, Techno-diversity, Algorithmic Social JusticeAbstract
This article focuses on diagnosing the technopolitics of digital governance in the field of formal education, analysing the ecosystem of data, algorithms and platforms (DAP) that regulate and mediate digital activity in educational institutions, whether in teaching, in organisational management tasks or in the field of lifelong learning. It also examines the socio-technical imaginaries that are contributing to the implementation of contemporary global digital reforms, inspired by the premises of technological accelerationism. In the first and second parts, the implications derived from the transition towards this data-algorithmic knowledge economy model are anticipated, addressing the issue of political networks of algorithmic governance in education and the role played by socio-technical imaginaries in the consolidation of these ecosystems. In the methodological section, research is presented based on a case study carried out in the community of Castilla y León regarding algorithmic governance processes in schools and their impact in terms of social justice and participatory parity. A series of in-depth interviews were conducted with teachers, members of management teams and those responsible for lifelong learning, adopting a discursive analysis methodology that allowed us to offer a series of results about the use that the educational community makes of the pre-established designs in the ecosystem of digital platforms and the role played by data within such structures. In the final discussion, we argue for integrating a techno-diversity perspective that focuses the object of study on the need to use algorithmic technologies and digital educational platforms with greater levels of civic awareness, social justice and systemic sensitivity.
Downloads
References
Avanessian, A. (2017). Aceleracionismo. Estrategias para una transición hacia el postcapitalismo. Caja Negra.
Ayala-Colqui, J. (2023). El nacimiento del "ciberalismo". Una genealogía crítica de la gubernamentalidad de Silicon Valley. Bajo Palabra. 221-254. https://doi.org/10.15366/bp2023.32.012.
Celis Bueno, C., y Schultz, M. J. (2021). Extractivismo de datos. En C. Bueno y M. J. Schultz, Imaginación maquínica. http://imaginacionmaquinica.cl/extractivismo-de-datos.
Colquhoun, HL., Levac, D., O'Brien, KK., Straus, S., Tricco, AC., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol, 67(12), 1291-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
Costa, F. (2021). Tecnoceno: Algoritmos, biohackers y nuevas formas de vida. Taurus.
Crawford, K. (2023). Atlas de IA. Poder, política y costes planetarios de la inteligencia artificial. Caja Negra.
Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050.
DeLanda, M. (2021). Teoría de los ensamblajes y complejidad social. Tinta Limón.
Dussel, I., & Williams, F. (2023). Los Imaginarios sociotécnicos de la política educativa digital en México (2012-2022). Profesorado, Revista De Currículum Y Formación Del Profesorado, 27(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v27i1.26247.
Fernández Mallo, A. (2023). La forma de la multitud (capitalismo, religión, identidad). Galaxia Gutenberg.
Ferrarelli, M., & Ricaurte, P. (2024). Problematizar la IA generativa en educación: metáforas, tensiones y horizontes posibles. L. Martins (Ed.). Aspectos éticos y pedagógicos de los datos y la tecnología en Educación (pp. 53-94). LMI.https://hdl.handle.net/2445/219893.
Ferrarelli, M. (2021). Alfabetismos aumentados: Producir, expresarse y colaborar en la cultura digital. Austral Comunicación, 10(2), 395-411. https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2021.1002.fer.
Ferrarelli, M. (2023). “¿Cómo abordar la inteligencia artificial en el aula?” Documento Nº 17. Proyecto Las preguntas educativas: ¿qué sabemos de educación? CIAESA.
Ferraris M. (2025). Webfare: de la guerra de los datos al bienestar de los datos. Materia Oscura.
Floridi, L. (2024). Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial. Herder.
Fraser, N. (2005). Reframing Justice in a Globalized World. The New Left Review, 36, 69-88. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii36/articles/nancy-fraser-reframing-justice-in-a-globalizing-world.
Goodyear, P. Realising the Good University: Social Innovation, Care, Design Justice and Educational Infrastructure. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 33–56 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00253-5.
Gough, D., Thomas, J. & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 1 (28). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-28.
Hayes, S. (2021). Postdigital Positionality: Developing Powerful Inclusive Narratives for Learning, Teaching, Research and Policy in Higher Education. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004466029.
Hui, Y. (2020). Fragmentar el futuro. Ensayos sobre Tecnodiversidad. Caja Negra.
Hui, Y. (2024). Sobre la existencia de los objetos digitales. Materia Oscura.
Jandric, P. & Ford, D. (2020). Postdigital Ecopedagogies: Genealogies, Contradictions, and Possible Futures. Postdigital Science and Education. 4. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00207-3.
Jandric, Petar & Knox, Jeremy & Macleod, Hamish & Sinclair, Christine. (2017). Learning in the age of algorithmic cultures. E-Learning and Digital Media. 14. 204275301773123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017731237.
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff and S-H. Kim (Eds.). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the fabrication of Power (1−33). University of Chicago Press.
Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. Sage.
Kuhn, C. (2024). Justicia de datos para una educación superior más justa. L. Martins (Ed.). Aspectos éticos y pedagógicos de los datos y la tecnología en Educación (pp. 120-136). LMI. http://www.lmi.ub.es/transmedia21.
Kuhn, C., Khoo, SM., Czerniewicz, L. et al. (2023) Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope. Postdigit Sci Educ 5, 894–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00395-8.
Lopez Gabrielidis, A. & Navarro, T. (2023). Repensar la inteligencia artificial: cognición distribuida y corporalidad expandida. En F. Rocca., & H. Borisonik (Comps.). ¿Un futuro automatizado? Perspectivas críticas y tecnodiversidades. UNSAM Edita.
Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labor of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597.
Quijano, A. (2000). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social. Journal of World-Systems Research, VI (2), 342-386. http://jwsr.ucr.edu.
Raffaghelli, J. E., Ferrarelli , M., y Kühn, C. (2023). ¿Qué significa alfabetizar en datos para ti (educador/educadora) hoy? Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (86), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2023.86.2907.
Rahm, L. (2021). Educational Imaginaries: Governance at the Intersection of Technology and Education. Journal of Education Policy, 38(1), 46-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1970233
Ricaurte, P. (2023). Descolonizar y despatriarcalizar las tecnologías. Centro de Cultura Digital.
Rivas Sanmartín, F. (2022). Una genealogía queer de los algoritmos computacionales [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/187463.
Rivera-Vargas, P. y Jacovkis, J. (2024). Plataformas digitales y corporaciones tecnológicas en la escuela. Una mirada desde los derechos de la infancia. Octaedro.
Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., Rinne, R. (2022). Reimagining Globalization and Education. Routledge.
Rodríguez, P. (2019). Las palabras en las cosas: saber, poder y subjetivación entre algoritmos y biomoléculas. Cactus.
Rouvroy, A. y Berns, T. (2018). Gubernamentalidad algorítmica y perspectivas de emancipación. ¿La disparidad como condición de individuación a través de la relación? Ecuador Debate, 104, 124-147. http://hdl.handle.net/10469/15424. .
Russell, L. (2022). Feminismo Glitch (Un manifiesto). Holobionte.
Saura, G., Cancela, E., & Adell, J. (2022). ¿Nuevo keynesianismo o austeridad inteligente? Tecnologías digitales y privatización educativa pos-COVID-19. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(116), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6926.
Saura, G., Díez-Gutiérrez, E. J., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2021). Innovación tecno-educativa “Google”. Plataformas digitales, datos y formación docente. REICE, 19(4), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2021.19.4.007.
Siles, I. & Gómez-Cruz, E. & Ricaurte, P. (2022). Toward a popular theory of algorithms. Popular Communication. 21. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2103140.
Simons, H. (2009). El estudio de caso: teoría y práctica. Morata.
Vercelli, A. H. (2024). Extractivismo de datos, regulaciones e inteligencias artificiales. F. Suárez Muñoz (Comp.). Internet de las cosas e Inteligencia Artificial Los retos regulatorios y éticos del extractivismo de datos, la privacidad y los derechos humanos (pp. 63-76). IoT CiberSec LAC. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244338.
Williamson, B., & Hogan, A. (2020). Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of Covid-19. Education International. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/216577/.
Williamson, B. & Komljenovic, J. (2022). Investing in imagined digital futures: the techno-financial ‘futuring’ of edtech investors in higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 64 (3), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2081587.
Wirtz, F. (2021). La cosmotécnica Como método: Más Allá De Las Geoculturas Cosmotechnics As Method: Beyond Geocultures. Technophany, A Journal for Philosophy and Technology 1 (1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.54195/technophany.12593.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Monica Salcedo Diez, Eduardo Fernández Rodríguez, Yasna Pradena García

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Acknowledgement – Non Commercial (by-nc): Generation of derivated Works is allowed as long as a commercial use is not developed. The original work cannot be used with commercial aims.
This journal does not apply any fee to the authors by the filing or processing of articles.





