National Reports and Global Education Policy Diffusion
The case of the Teaching and Learning International Survey
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.40.2022.31442Mots-clés :
Comparative education, Education policy, OECD, TALIS, Survey researchRésumé
Comparative research projects have become one of the main sources of information to investigate national systems of education and to inform education policy making at the national level. However, the way that national education authorities interpret and use the results of these projects may differ substantially among countries. This process, that we refer to as the national interpretation in comparative education, is overlooked in the debate regarding comparative research projects in education. This paper addresses this issue analysing national reports of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) from eight different countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada (Alberta), Chile, England, Mexico, Portugal and Spain.
The results indicate that the national interpretation and reporting of international comparative data is fairly homogeneous considering the socio-educational diversity of the selected countries. However, our analysis also suggests that reports from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, and England) have a higher degree of similarity with the survey’s conceptual framework, whereas national reports from Mexico and Chile showed a lower degree of similarity. Moreover, our analysis reinforces the relevance of understanding countries’ focus and interpretation of evidence produced by international comparative research projects in education.
Téléchargements
Références
Afonso, A. J. (2012). Para uma concetualização alternativa de accountability em educação. Educação & Sociedade, 33(119), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302012000200008
Ball, S. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119–130.
Braun, M., & Harkness, J. (2005). Text and context: Challenges to comparability in survey questions. In J. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik (Ed.), Methodological aspects in cross-national research (pp. 95–107). Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA).
Burns, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Teaching Around the World: What Can TALIS Tell Us? Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Cabral Maués, O. (2011). A política da OCDE para a educação e a formação docente. A nova regulação? Educação, 34(1).
DGEEC, D.-G. de E. da E. e C. (2014). Relatório TALIS 2013 – Crenças e práticas pedagógicas dos professores do 3.o ciclo do ensino básico. DGEEC. http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/292/%7B$clientServletPath%7D/?newsId=516&fileName=RelatorioNacionalTalis.pdf
Eide, K. (1990). 30 Years of Educational Collaboration in the OECD. ED. 90/CPA.401/DP.1/11. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0008/000857/085725eo.pdf
Fernandes, D. (2006). Para uma teoria da avaliação formativa. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 21–50.
Freeman, C., O’Malley, K., Eveleigh, F., & Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (2014). Australian teachers and the learning environment: An analysis of teacher response to TALIS 2013 : final report.
Goergen, P. L. (2018). Educación comparada: Una disciplina actual u obsoleta? RBEC - Revista Brasileira de Educação Comparada, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20396/rbec.v1i1.9385
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669
Harkness, J. A., Vijver, F. J. R. van de, & Mohler, P. P. (Eds.). (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. J. Wiley.
Heath, A., Fisher, S., & Smith, S. (2005). THE GLOBALIZATION OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.090203.103000
Herradas Martin, S. (2021). Evaluación de la práctica de los docentes de educación obligatoria, estudio comparado en Europa. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 39, 238–253. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.39.2021.27388
Lourenço Filho, M. B. (2004). Educação comparada. Inep/MEC.
MECD, M. D. E., CULTURA Y. DEPORTE. (2014). TALIS 2013 Estudio internacional de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Informe español (p. 144). http://www.oecd.org/education/school/Spain-talis-publicaciones-sep2014_es.pdf
Mello, L. de, & Dutz, M. A. (2012). Promoting Inclusive Growth. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264168305-en
Micklewright, J., Jerrim, J., Vignoles, A., Jenkins, A., Allen, R., Ilie, S., Bellarbre, E., Barrera, F., & Hein, C. (2014). Teachers in England’s secondary schools: Evidence from TALIS 2013 (p. 206). Department for Education. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/UK-TALIS-2013-national-report.pdf
MINEDUC. (2017). Contextualización de la enseñanza en Chile Resultados de la encuesta internacional TALIS 2013, OCDE. Ministerio de Educación, República de Chile.
Morgan, C., & Volante, L. (2016). A review of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s international education surveys: Governance, human capital discourses, and policy debates. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316652024
Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2018). Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118794076
OECD. (2013). Teaching and Learning International Survey: Conceptual Framework (p. 60). http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS%20Conceptual%20Framework_FINAL.pdf
OECD. (2014a). TALIS 2013 Technical Report (p. 461). OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-technical-report-2013.pdf
OECD. (2014b). TALIS 2013 Results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en
Papadopoulos, G. S. (1994). Education 1960-1990: The OECD perspective. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ; OECD Publications and Information Centre [distributor].
Phelps, R. P. (2017). Kill the messenger: The war on standardized testing. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1588481
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). The OECD and Global Shifts in Education Policy. In R. Cowen & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), International Handbook of Comparative Education (pp. 437–453). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6403-6_28
Robertson, S. L. (2012). Placing Teachers in Global Governance Agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1086/667414
Rønning Haugen, C. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Discourses on Equity in Education in the OECD and Norway. In A. W. Wiseman (Ed.), International Perspectives on Education and Society (Vol. 13, pp. 207–238). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679(2010)0000013011
Smith, T. M., & Baker, D. P. (2001). Worldwide Growth and Institutionalization of Statistical Indicators for Education Policy-Making. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(3/4), 141–152.
Sorensen, T. B., & Robertson, S. L. (2020). Ordinalization and the OECD’s Governance of Teachers. Comparative Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1086/706758
Valle, J. M. (2012). La política supranacional: Un nuevo campo de conocimientopara abordar las políticas educativas en un mundo globalizado. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 0(20), 109. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.20.2012.7595
Van de Vijver, F., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating Tests. European Psychologist, 1(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.1.2.89
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
