Religión, escolarización y Estado: negociando y construyendo el espacio secular

Autores/as

  • Leslie Bash UCL Institute of Education, University College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.33.2019.22327

Palabras clave:

Religiones comparadas, Educación Comparada, Espacio secular

Resumen

La génesis de este artículo se origina en dos presentaciones en diferentes conferencias para dos audiencias diferentes. La primera fue para un grupo mixto de educadores de maestros, sacerdotes y monjas católicos romanos, así como otros de diversas tradiciones religiosas, en una conferencia de un día sobre religión y pluralismo celebrada en Dublín, República de Irlanda. El enfoque expresado para esta conferencia fue «interreligioso» pero con la adición de una dimensión secular. La segunda presentación fue para un grupo internacional compuesto principalmente por académicos de educación comparada en Glasgow, Escocia. Aunque las dos presentaciones eran muy similares en contenido, el documento de Dublín tenía una orientación distinta. Dado que el sistema escolar irlandés financiado con fondos públicos se caracteriza por una fuerte participación de la religión (Departamento de Educación y Habilidades, 2017), en particular, la de la Iglesia Católica Romana, la tradición dominante en ese país, la presentación de Dublín siguió un enfoque que buscaba ampliar la agenda educativa. Específicamente, se centró en la discusión continua sobre el papel de la secularidad en los sistemas escolares donde el estado central sancionaba los enfoques confesionales de la religión. Por otro lado, la presentación de Glasgow fue más «académica» en tono, buscando reubicar la secularidad y la religión en una relación no enfrentada que, a su vez, se argumentó, que era funcional para los sistemas de educación del siglo XXI.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Leslie Bash, UCL Institute of Education, University College London

Leslie Bash holds an Honorary Readership at the UCL Institute of Education, University College London where he is Director of the International Centre for Intercultural Studies. In addition, he is also Reader in Jewish Education at Leo Baeck College, London, and is currently secretary general of the International Association for Intercultural Education. He was previously based at Anglia Ruskin University where he was Principal Lecturer in Education and director of the Doctorate in Education programme. Having graduated in sociology and having obtained a teaching certificate he subsequently taught social studies in London secondary schools and, at the same time pursued postgraduate studies in education, eventually gaining a PhD in comparative education. He has published widely, having authored, co-authored, edited and contributed to a number of volumes, as well as journal articles, in urban, international and intercultural education. Among his research interests are religion, the state and education; diversity, equity and education; intersectionality and cultural issues in education.

Citas

Abizadeh, A. (2007). On the philosophy/rhetoric binaries. Or, is Habermasian discourse motivationally impotent? Philosophy Social Criticism, 33(4), pp. 445-472

Abrams, F. (2015). Why are orthodox Jewish religious schools unregulated? The Guardian 11 August

Bash, L. (2008). ‘Faith, science and modernity: some issues for education in the 21st century’. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Comparative Education Society in Europe Conference Berlin: Peter Lang.

Bash, L. (1981a). A comparative study of political education in England and the United States (with special reference to social change in advanced capitalist countries). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation / Unpublished master's thesis). University of London.

Bash, L. (1981b). Social Studies and Social Order. Social Alternatives, 2(1) March. University of Queensland.

Bash, L. (1976). A comparative study of the extent of societal constraints upon social studies education in England and theUnited States. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation / Unpublished master's thesis). University of London.

Bernstein, B. (1970). Education cannot compensate for society. New Society, 15, pp. 387, 344-347.

Bottomore, T. & Rubel M. (1956). Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Social. Philosophy. London: Watts

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion London: Bantam Press

Department of Education and Skills (2017). Republic of Ireland. http://www.education.ie/en/ Accessed 06.04.2017

Durkheim, E. (1997). The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.

Fraser, J. W. (2016). From the Scopes Trial of 1925 to battles over intelligent design in 2015: ninety years of unresolvable American efforts to come to terms with teaching evolution in schools March. Seminar presentation, UCL Institute of education, University College London.

Gaine, C . (1987). No Problem Here. London: Hutchinson

Gaine, C. (1995). Still No Problem Here. London: Trentham Books

Gerth H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge

Gould, S. J. (2006). The Richness of Life. London: Jonathan Cape

Habermas J. (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press

Hans, N. (1949). Comparative education: a study of educational factors and traditions London: Routledge

Hunter-Henin, M. (2012). Why the French don’t like the burqa: laïcité, national identity and religious freedom. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(03), July.

Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper and Row

King, E. (1958). Other Schools and Ours. New York: Rinehart

Meer, N. & Modood, T. (2011). How does Interculturalism Contrast with Multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 9, December. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjis20 Accessed 07.04.2017.

Melville, D. (1868). The probable course of legislation on popular education, and the position of the church with regard to it London: Rivingtons

Sahgal, G. (2013). Secular space: bridging the religious-secular divide?. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050.

Steinberg, S. (2001). Introduction: The Neo-liberal Construction of the Multi/Intercultural Conversation: It Is Not a Small, Definable World After All Counterpoints. Vol. 94 Multi / Intercultural Conversations: A Reader pp. xix-xxix. Peter Land AG http://www.jstor.org/stable/42976757 Accessed 07.04.2017

Tonnies, F. (1955). Community and Association. London: Routledge

Descargas

Publicado

2019-01-25

Cómo citar

Bash, L. (2019). Religión, escolarización y Estado: negociando y construyendo el espacio secular. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (33), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.33.2019.22327

Número

Sección

MONOGRÁFICO: Religiones comparadas