Conceptual learning in pre-service teacher groups through a Text Mining intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.38256Keywords:
textual analysis, content analysis, concept formation, social learning, visual learning, educational technology, higher education, teacher educationAbstract
Concept acquisition is a critical aspect in the education of teachers yet is especially challenging in group contexts in which traditional teaching strategies often fail to convey complex notions effectively. This study investigates the potential of text mining (TM) based learning analytics as a teaching tool to enhance conceptual learning in pre-service teachers. To do so, it analyses how the learning of complex and abstract educational concepts was affected by a TM-based learning analytics intervention, in comparison with traditional teaching strategies, including the elaboration of an individual project, and the attendance of a master class. Quasi-experimental pre- and post-tests were thus administered to three non-equivalent groups (A, B, and C, respectively) of a total of 81 master’s students enrolled in a distance education teacher training programme at a Spanish university, and token corpora were analysed using TM techniques in collected definitions of abstract educational concepts (1017 pre-test and 1133 post-test tokens from Group A; 1127 pre-test and 1111 post-test tokens from Group B; and 1101 pre-test and 1173 post-test tokens from Group C). It was found that the TM-based learning analytics intervention significantly enhanced the students’ keyword selection in submitted definitions (t Yuen = –6.37, p < .001, δR AKP = –1.03, CI95% = –2.10, –.74) and the association of relevant terms (with post-test Jaccard values ranging from .217 to .917) compared to the other teaching approaches. This study therefore offers empirical evidence that TM-based learning analytics can be an effective pedagogical tool that promotes an enhanced learning of abstract concepts in the education of teachers. The results underscore the value of TM-based educational technology in optimizing conceptual learning and resource efficiency in higher education settings.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, J., Buendia, O., Pinto, A., & Gutiérrez, J. (2022). Social learning analytics for determining learning styles in a smart classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1651745
Atkinson, M. B., Krishnan, S., McNeil, L. A., Luft, J. A., & Pienta, N. J. (2020). Constructing Explanations in an Active Learning Preparatory Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(3), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00901
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Azadi, G., Biria, R., & Nasri, M. (2018). Operationalising the Concept of Mediation in L2 Teacher Education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.17
Babaahmadi, A., Maraghi, E., Moradi, S., & Younespour, S. (2021). Comparison Between Peer Learning and Conventional Methods in Biostatistics Course Among Postgraduate Nursing Students’ Final Score, Statistics and Test Anxiety: A Quasi-experimental Study with a Control Group. Shiraz E-Medical Journal, 22(11), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5812/semj.111984
Begusic, D., Pintar, D., Skopljanac-Macina, F., & Vranic, M. (2018). Annotating Exam Questions Through Automatic Learning Concept Classification. 2018 26th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks, SoftCOM 2018, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.23919/SOFTCOM.2018.8555784
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019). Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 120–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001
Breivik, J. (2020). Argumentative patterns in students’ online discussions in an introductory philosophy course: Micro-and acrostructures of argumentation as analytic tools. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2020-01-02
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley.
Casanoves, M., Solé-Llussà, A., Haro, J., Gericke, N., y Valls, C. (2022). Assessment of the ability of game-based science learning to enhance genetic understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2044301
Cortes, D. M. G., Rodríguez, C. M. O., & Alejo, V. V. (2019). Learning object for contextualization of matrix operations in digital image processing through programming. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362876
Costa, A. P. M., Reategui, E. B., Epstein, D., Meyer, D. D., Lima, E. G., & Silva, K. H. da. (2017). Emprego de um software baseado em mineração de texto e apresentação gráfica multirrepresentacional como apoio à aprendizagem de conceitos científicos a partir de textos no Ensino Fundamental. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 23(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320170010006
De Lin, O., Gottipati, S., Ling, L. S., & Shankararaman, V. (2021). Mining Informal & Short Student Self-Reflections for Detecting Challenging Topics – A Learning Outcomes Insight Dashboard. 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct 2021, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637181
Erkens, M., Bodemer, D., & Hoppe, H. U. (2016). Improving collaborative learning in the classroom: Text mining based grouping and representing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9243-5
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Polakowski, N., Gunderson, B., Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2021). Utilizing Peer Review and Revision in STEM to Support the Development of Conceptual Knowledge Through Writing. Written Communication, 38(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211006038
Freeman, D. (2018). Arguing for a knowledge-base in language teacher education, then (1998) and now (2018). Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777534
Gaglo, K., Degboe, B. M., Kossingou, G. M., & Ouya, S. (2022). Proposal of conversational chatbots for educational remediation in the context of covid-19. 2022 24th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), Feb 2022, 354–358. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT53585.2022.9728860
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gao, R., & Lloyd, J. (2020). Precision and Accuracy: Knowledge Transformation through Conceptual Learning and Inquiry-Based Practices in Introductory and Advanced Chemistry Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00563
Ghanizadeh, A., Tabeie, M., & Pourtousi, Z. (2024). The role of university instructor’s narrative in students’ sustained attention, emotional involvement and cognitive learning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0278
Greco, P., & Piaget, J. (1959). Apprentissage et connaissance. P.U.F.
Guerrettaz, A. M., Zahler, T., Sotirovska, V., & Boyd, A. S. (2020). ‘We acted like ELLs’: A pedagogy of embodiment in preservice teacher education. Language Teaching Research, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820909980
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J. C., Hernández Alcántara, D., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(3), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12008-019-00557-8/FIGURES/2
Hernández-Lara, A. B., Perera-Lluna, A., & Serradell-López, E. (2021). Game learning analytics of instant messaging and online discussion forums in higher education. Education and Training, 63(9), 1288–1308. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2020-0334
Hutmacher, F. (2019). Why Is There So Much More Research on Vision Than on Any Other Sensory Modality? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02246
Inada, Y. (2018). Collaborative learning in entrepreneurship education in a Japanese business school. Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE, Sep 2018, 319–327.
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1038/35058500
Jeong, A., & Chiu, M. M. (2020). Production blocking in brainstorming arguments in online group debates and asynchronous threaded discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3097–3114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09845-7
Kanwisher, N., & Wojciulik, E. (2000). Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1038/35039043
Khong, I., Aprila Yusuf, N., Nuriman, A., & Bayu Yadila, A. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Data Quality on Decision-Making Processes in Information Intensive Organizations. APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM), 7(3), 253–260.
https://doi.org/10.33050/atm.v7i3.2138
Kong, S.-C., Kwok, W.-Y., & Poon, C.-W. (2021). Evaluating a learning trail for academic integrity development in higher education using bilingual text mining. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1899041
Koong, C.-S., Lin, H.-C., Wu, C.-C., Chen, C.-H., Lee, P.-H., & Wang, H.-C. (2021). Design and Implementation of an iOS APP: Multimedia Interactive System and Items for Woodworking Teaching. En M. M. T. Rodrigo, S. Iyer, A. Mitrovic, H. N. H. Cheng, D. Kohen-Vacs, C. Matuk, A. Palalas, R. Rajenran, K. Seta, y J. Wang (Eds.), 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, ICCE 2021 - Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 310–316). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Kortemeyer, G., Anderson, D., Desrochers, A. M., Hackbardt, A., Hoekstra, K., Holt, A., Iftekhar, A., Kabaker, T., Keller, N., Korzecke, Z., Gogonis, A., Manson, Q., McNeill, G., Mookerjee, D., Nguyen, S., Person, B., Stafford, M., Takamoribraganca, L., Yu, Z., … Ratan, R. (2019). Using a computer game to teach circuit concepts. European Journal of Physics, 40(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab2a1d
Liao, A. Y. H. (2022). An APP-Based E-Learning Platform for Artificial Intelligence Cross-Domain Application Practices. En L. Barolli, K. Yim, y H. C. Chen (Eds.), Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing. IMIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 279, pp. 341–351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79728-7_34
Magana, A. J., Serrano, M. I., & Rebello, N. S. (2019). A sequenced multimodal learning approach to support students’ development of conceptual learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12356
Nguyen, K. A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C. J., DeMonbrun, M., Crockett, C., Tharayil, S., Shekhar, P., Waters, C., & Rosenberg, R. (2021). Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40594-021-00270-7/TABLES/2
Nobre, A. C. (Kia), & Kastner, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Attention (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.001.0001
Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento y de la Salud II. Síntesis.
Pillutla, V. S., Tawfik, A. A., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2020). Detecting the Depth and Progression of Learning in Massive Open Online Courses by Mining Discussion Data. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(4), 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09434-w
Pintar, D., Begušić, D., Škopljanac-Mačina, F., & Vranić, M. (2018). Automatic extraction of learning concepts from exam query repositories. Journal of Communications Software and Systems, 14(4), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.24138/jcomss.v14i4.605
Reategui, E., Costa, A. P. M., Epstein, D., & Carniato, M. (2019). Learning Scientific Concepts with Text Mining Support (pp. 97–105). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_12
Redondo López, J. M. (2021). Improving Concept Learning Through Specialized Digital Fanzines. 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET52601.2021.00023
Reyes-Santías, F., Rivo-López, E., Villanueva-Villar, M., & Míguez-Álvarez, C. (2021). Movie clips for teaching business management: Step by step. Journal of Education for Business, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1991258
Reynolds, J. A., Cai, V., Choi, J., Faller, S., Hu, M., Kozhumam, A., Schwartzman, J., & Vohra, A. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic: Using high‐impact writing assignments to balance rigor, engagement, flexibility, and workload. Ecology and Evolution, 10(22), 12573–12580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6776
Rodriguez, M., & Potvin, G. (2021). Frequent small group interactions improve student learning gains in physics: Results from a nationally representative prepost study of four-year colleges. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020131
Shwartz, V. (2021). Dissertation Abstract: Learning High Precision Lexical Inferences. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(3–4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00709-7
Taga, M., Onishi, T., & Hirokawa, S. (2018). Automated Evaluation of Students Comments Regarding Correct Concepts and Misconceptions of Convex Lenses. Proceedings - 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2018, 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2018.00059
Tsai, M.-J., Wu, A.-H., & Wang, C.-Y. (2022). Pre-training and cueing effects on students’ visual behavior and task outcomes in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100188
Turner, R. L. (1975). An Overview of Research in Teacher Education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 76(6), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146817507600605
Turner, S. A., Pérez-Quiñones, M. A., & Edwards, S. H. (2018). Peer Review in CS2: Conceptual Learning and High-Level Thinking. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 18(3), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152715
Volkwyn, T. S., Gregorcic, B., Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2020). Learning to use Cartesian coordinate systems to solve physics problems: the case of ‘movability.’ European Journal of Physics, 41(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab8b54
Wittek, A. L. (2018). Processes of Writing as Mediational Tool in Higher Education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258664
Ye, L., Eichler, J. F., Gilewski, A., Talbert, L. E., Mallory, E., Litvak, M., M. Rigsby, E., Henbest, G., Mortezaei, K., & Guregyan, C. (2020). The impact of coupling assessments on conceptual understanding and connection-making in chemical equilibrium and acid-base chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00038h
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2025-06-30 (3)
- 2025-06-20 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fran J. García-García, Cristian Mollà-Esparza, Inmaculada López Francés
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Educación XX1 is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)
