Complex transitions between different learning contexts: a case study from a French vocational school

Authors

  • Laurent Veillard Lumière University Lyon 2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.29.2017.17552

Keywords:

vocational education, learning environment, transitions

Abstract

In France, secondary initial vocational courses are characterised by learning contexts that can vary greatly from one to another, both in terms of content and with regard to space configurations and transmission methods. In this paper, we look at the continuities and discontinuities caused by switching, daily or weekly, between three different teaching contexts (french lesson, technical theoretical lesson, practical session in a school workshop), in a secondary training course in the field of car repairing. We used sociological (classification, frame) and didactical (learning milieu) concepts to analyse and compare both the specificities of knowledge and the configuration each teaching situation in terms of space, material and symbolic components. Our results show more or less subtle and implicit continuities and discontinuities for students to shift from one context to another. The problem is that they generally receive very little help to identify these ruptures and continuities, due to a lack of pedagogical collaboration between the teachers of different disciplines.

Downloads

Author Biography

Laurent Veillard, Lumière University Lyon 2

Associate professor, habilited to supervise Phd students. IUT Lumière (Université Lyon 2) and ICAR Research Unit. Lecturer (70 th section, in Education Sciences). Associate Researcher: Interaction and Training Research Group (resp: L. Filliettaz), Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva. Main research areas: The practices of transmission and learning of knowledge in initial vocational training (secondary, higher); the instrumentation of SHS research from film recordings and other data. 

References

http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

10-Complex

BEACH, K. (1999): Consequential transitions: a sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education, Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 101–139.

BELHADJIN, A., & Lopez, M. (2010) : Littérature et langue en LP. Quels enjeux pour quels élèves?, 11e rencontres des chercheurs en didactique des littératures, pp. 14–18, (Genève).

BERSTEIN, B. (1996): Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, Research, Critique (London, Taylor and Francis).

BILLET, S. (2006): Relational Interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 1, pp. 53–69.

BONNERY, S. (2007): Comprendre l’échec scolaire. Élèves en difficultés et dispositifs pédagogiques (Paris, La dispute).

BROUSSEAU, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la recherche en didactique des mathématiques, Recherche En Didactique Des Mathématiques, 7,2, pp. 33-115.

CHARLOT, B. (1999): Le rapport au savoir en milieu populaire. Une recherche dans les lycées professionnels de banlieue (Paris: Anthropos).

DE SAINT-GEORGES, I. (2008): La multimodalité et ses ressources pour l’enseignement –apprentissage, in L. FILLIETTAZ, I. DE SAINT-GEORGES, & B. DUC (Eds.), Vos mains sont intelligentes. Interactions en formation professionnelle, 117, pp. 117–158, (Genève, cahier des la section suisse des sciences de l’éducation)

Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings, in H. RAINBIRD, A. FULLER, & A. MUNRO (Eds.), Workplace learning in context, pp. 201–221 (London, Routledge).

JELLAB, A. (2008): Sociologie du lycée professionnel. L’expérience des élèves et des enseignants dans une institution en mutation (Toulouse, Presses Universitaires du Mirail).

JORGENSEN, C.H. (2008): School and workplace as learning environments in vocational education and training, In V. AARKROG & C. H. JORGENSEN (Eds.), Divergence and convergence in education and work, pp. 171–195 (Bern: Peter Lang).

LAMBERT, P. (2014): Sociolinguistique et éducation. Une approche ethnographique. Dossier d’habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université Stendhal-Grenoble 3.

LEMBRÉ, S. (2016): Histoire de l’enseignement technique (Paris: La découverte).

LÓPEZ, M. (2010): Enseigner le français en lycée professionnel : quels changements dans le métier ?, Le français aujourd’hui, 171, 4, pp. 49–60.

PALHETA, U. (2012): La domination scolaire. Sociologie de l’enseignement professionnel et de son public (Paris, P.U.F).

PELPEL, P., & TROGER, V. (1993): Histoire de l’enseignement technique (Paris, Hachette).

SENSEVY, G. (2007): Des catégories pour décrire et comprendre l’action didactique, in G. SENSEVY & A. MERCIER (Eds.), Agir ensemble : Eléments de théorisation de l’action conjointe du professeur et des élèves, pp. 13–49 (Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes)

SENSTRÖM, M.-L., & TYNJÄLÄ, P. (2009): Towards integration of work and learning. Strategy for connectivity and transformation (New York, Springer).

TROGER, V. (2002): Vocational training in French schools: the fragile State-employer alliance, in CEDEFOP (Ed.), Towards a history of vocational education and training (VET) in Europe in a comparative perspective, first international conference, pp. 66–74 (Florence).

Downloads

Published

2017-06-01

How to Cite

Veillard, L. (2017). Complex transitions between different learning contexts: a case study from a French vocational school. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (29), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.29.2017.17552

Issue

Section

MONOGRAPHIC SECTION: Vocational Education and Training An International Perspective

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.