DO SEXIST ATTITUDES PERSIST IN COLLEGE STUDENTS? AN ANALYSIS OF ITS PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS, AND GENDER DIFFERENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.23629Keywords:
Sexism, sex differences, students, equal opportunities, attitudes.Abstract
Sexist attitudes constitute the fundamental axis on which unequal relationships between men and women are built and maintained. At present, and despite the fact that in Western countries sexism manifests itself in more subtle ways, it is found that a portion of the population continues to harbor sexist beliefs. This work aims to analyze, from a gender perspective, the effect of a series of personal characteristics on the prediction of sexist beliefs in a sample of college students in Spain (N = 2,112, 63.6% women and 36.4% men). To evaluate the degree of sexism, the short version of the Ambivalent Sexism Scale (ASI, Expósito, Moya, & Glick, 1998) was used, on which higher scores represent higher levels of sexism (α = .88). Explanatory variables included age, political ideology, nationality, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, experiences of victimization, and media consumption.The results indicated that men scored significantly higher than women on the ambivalent sexism scale. In addition, higher scores were found for men on the subscales of both hostile and benevolent sexism. On the other hand, the results showed that conservative ideologies and religious faith predict more sexist attitudes in both men and women. However, it was found that the effect of age, political ideology, and sexual orientation depends on the participant’s gender. These results will contribute to the development of educational programs aimed at young people, facilitating the identification of particularly vulnerable groups and areas that require special attention.
Downloads
References
Abbey, A., Jacques-Tiura, A.J., & LeBreton, J.M. (2011). Risk factor for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Agressive Behavior, 37, 450-464. 10.1002/ab.20399
Aguaded, E.M. (2017). Análisis de la presencia de sexismo en alumnado universitario. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 32, 127-143.
Aosved, A. C. & Long, P. (2006). Cooccurrence of rape myth acceptance, sexism, racism, homophobia, ageism, classim, and religious intolerance. Sex Roles, 55, 481-492.: 10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4
Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. (1995). Declaración y plataforma de acción de Beijing. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/Ns1QHN
Bendixen, M., Henriksen, M., & Nøstdahl, R.K. (2014). Attitudes toward rape and attribution of responsability to rape victims in Norwegian community simple. Nordic Psychology, 66, 168-186. 10.1080/19012276.2014.931813
Bendixen, M. & Kennair, L.E.O. (2017). When less is more: Psychometric properties of Norwegian short-forms of the Ambivalent Sexism Scales (ASI
and AMI) and the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRM) Scale. Scandinavian
Journal of Psychology, 58, 541-550. 10.1111/sjop.12392
Chapleau, K.M., Oswald, D.L., & Russell, B.L. (2008). Male rape myths: The
role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23,
-615. 10.1177/0886260507313529
Check, J.V P., Malamuth, N.M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. (1985). On hostile ground. Psychology Today, 29, 56-61.
Christopher, A.N. & Mull, M.S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223-230. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
Collins, R. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64, 290–298. 10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5
Cross, E.J. & Overall, N.C. (2017). Women’s attraction to benevolent sexism: Needing relationship security predicts greater attraction to men who endorse benevolent sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 336-347. 10.1002/ejsp.2334
Cuadrado, I. (2009). El estudio psicosocial del prejuicio. En E. Gaviria, I. Cuadrado, y M. López-Sáez (Coords.), Introducción a la Psicología Social (pp. 387-423). Madrid: Sanz y Torres.
Davies, M., Gilston, J., & Rogers, P. (2012). Examining the relationshyip
between male rape my, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2807-2823. 10.1177/0886260512438281
Silván-Ferrero, M. & Bustillos, A. (2007). Benevolent sexism toward men and women: Justification of the traditionalth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles system and conventional gender roles in Spain. Sex Roles, 57, 607-614.
1007/s11199-007-9271-8
Doob, C.B. (2015). Social inequality and social stratification in US society. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315662800
Eckes, T. & Six-Materna, I. (1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Eine Skala zur erfassung des ambivalenten Sexismus. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211-228. 10.1024//0044-3514.30.4.211
Esteban, B. y Fernández, P. (2017). ¿Actitudes sexistas en jóvenes?: Exploración del sexismo ambivalente y neosexismo en población universitaria. Femeris, 2, 137-153. Doi: 10.20318/femeris.2017.3762
Expósito, F., Montes, B., y Palacios, M. (2000). Características distintivas de la discriminación hacia las mujeres en el ámbito laboral. En D. Caballero, M.T. Méndez, y J. Pastor (Eds.), La mirada psicosociológica. Grupos, procesos y lenguajes (pp. 703-710). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Expósito, F., Moya, M., y Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. Revista de Psicología Social, 55, 893–905.
1174/021347498760350641
Fosnacht, K. Sarraf, S. Howe, E., & Peck, L.K. (2017). How important are high response rates for college students? Review of Higher Education, 40, 245-265. 10.1353/rhe.2017.0003
Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication & Society, 1, 175–194.
1080/15205436.1998.9677855
Giaccardi, S., Ward, L.M., Seabrook, R.C., Manago, A., & Lippman, J. 2016). Media and modern manhood: Testing associations between media
consumption and young men’s acceptance of traditional gender ideologies. Sex Roles, 75, 151-163. 10.1007/s11199-016-0588-z
Glick, P. & Fiske, S.T. (1996). The ambivalence sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P. & Fiske, S.T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530-535. 10.1177/0361684311414832
Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J.L., Abrams, D., Masser, B.,… López López, W. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and
benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. (2002). Education and catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433-441. 10.1023/A:1021696209949
Greenwood, D.N. & Lippman, J.R. (2010). Gender and media: Content, uses, and impact. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 643–669). NewYork, USA: Springer.
1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_27
Herrero, J., Rodríguez, F.J., & Torres, A. (2017). Acceptability of partner violence in 51 societies: The role of sexism and attitudes toward violence in social relationships. Violence Against Women, 23, 351-367.
1177/1077801216642870
Houvouras, S. & Carter, J.S. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234-256. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00072.x
Jensen, L.C. & Jensen, J. (1993). Family values, religiosity, and gender. Psychological Reports, 73, 429-430. 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.2.429
Kreindler, S.A. (2005). A dual group processes model of individual differences in prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9,
-107. 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_1
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865. 10.1093/poq/nfn063
Lameiras, M. (2002). El sexismo y sus dos caras: de la hostilidad a la ambivalencia. Anuario de Sexología, 8, 91-102.
Lameiras, M. y Rodríguez, Y. (2002). Evaluación del sexismo moderno en adolescentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 17, 119–127.
1174/021347402320007555
Lameiras, M. y Rodríguez, Y. (2003). Evaluación del sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes gallegos/as. Revista de Acción Psicológica, 2, 131-136.
5944/ap.2.2.526
Maltby, L.E., Hall, M.E L., Anderson, T.L., & Edwards, K. (2010). Religion and sexism: The moderating role of participant gender. Sex Roles, 62, 615-622. 10.1007/s11199-010-9754-x
Mladinic, A., Saiz, J.L., Díaz, M., Ortega, A., y Oyarce, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes universitarios chilenos: Teoría, medición y diferencias de género. Revista de Psicología Social y Personalidad, 14, 1-14.
Morales, M., Díaz, G., y Etopa, M.P. (2013). Identidad de género y sexismo en estudiantes de segundo de bachillerato del norte de Gran Canaria. Journal of developmental and educational psychology, 1, 451-456.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
Roets, A., Van Hiel, A., & Dhont, K. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26, 350-359.: 10.1002/per.843
Sánchez, L. & Hall, C.S. (1999). Traditional values and democratic impulses: The gender division of labor in contemporary Spain. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 659-685. 10.3138/jcfs.30.4.659
Stevenson, R.F. (2015). Predictors of ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women in a latter-day saint (LDS) adult sample: A test of glick and fiske’s
ambivalent sexism theory. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A:
Humanities and Social Sciences, 76(3-A(E)).
Swami, V., Coles, R., Wyrozumska, K., Wilson, E., Salem, N., & Furnham, A. (2010). The attractive female body weight and female body dissatisfaction in 26 countries across 10 world regions: Results of the International Body Project I. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 309-325. 10.1177/0146167209359702
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
