Progress of the linkage of the STE(A)M model in the Spanish, American and Colombian educational system. A systematic review of literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.42.2023.31385Keywords:
STEM, STEAM, scientific education, transdisciplinarityAbstract
The present research seeks to establish what has been the academic production that has dealt with the issue of the implementation of the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) and STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) models in the educational systems of Colombia, Spain and the United States, between the years 2014 to 2021. For this a systemic review of the literature is used, taking into account the process of search, description, evaluation and analysis of bibliography related to the STE (A) M model, both in the implementation of activities in the classroom and without the implementation of activities as well of some documentary analysis. As a result of this review, enriching questions are evidenced regarding educational strategies for the development of computational thinking and engineering, as well as the strong influence of scientific and mathematical thinking on the STE (A) model and its reconfiguration for the inclusion or participation of the arts, it also highlights issues related to government efforts and society as a whole to strengthen the accessibility and permanence of young people in STE (A)M programs, recognizing the importance of the gender and diversity categories cultural. This results in a discussion regarding aspects that have been annexed to the fundamental pillar of STE (A) M education, such as scientific literacy, as well as in the identification of the approaches found in the literature about the need or relevance of engineering in society, science teaching and its implications in the development of STE (A) M competencies, understanding of some perspectives in new methodological proposals, STE (A) M models in Colombia, Spain and the United States, the needs related to the inclusive aspect of gender, among other issues that are developed in the scenarios of the school.
Downloads
References
Agredo, V., & Ruíz, P. (2019). Human-computer interaction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Allendoerfer, C., Wilson, D., Kim, M., & Burpee, E. (2014). Mapping beliefs about teaching to patterns of instruction within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(7), 758–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901962
Almaraz, C., & López, C. (2018). La metodología context-based approach en STEM: modelización de datos meteorológicos. Matemáticas, Educación y Sociedad, 1(1), 1-10. Obtenido de https://helvia.uco.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10396/20230/mes_1_1_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., Rangwala, H., & Lester, J. (2017). Retentions and persistence among STEM studentes: A comparison of direct admit and transfer students across engineering and science. ASEE Annual conference and exposition, Conferente proceedings. Obtenido de https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/18453/view
Arteaga, E., Armada, L., & Del Sol, J. (2016). La enseñanza de las ciencias en el nuevo milenio. Retos y sugerencias. Universidad y sociedad, 8(1), 169-176. Obtenido de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-36202016000100025&lng=es&tlng=es.
Asunda, P. (2018). Infusing Computer Science in Engineering and Technology Education: An Integrated STEM Perspective. Journal of Technology Studies, 44(1), 2-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v44i1.a.1
Bautista, D., Suarez, M., & Gómez, J. (2020). Educación STEM en las actitudes de los estudiantes de secundaria hacia la ingeniería. Educación En Ingeniería, 15(29), 89–103. doi: https://doi.org/10.26507/rei.v15n29.1079
Calvo, A., Gómez, E., & Peña, P. (2020). Generalidades de la ciencia y lo científico. En A. Calvo, E. Gómez, & J. Daza, Modelos teóricos para fisioterapia (págs. 11-33). Cali: Universidad Santiago de Cali.
Celis, J., M., G., Duque, M., Canu, M., Danies, G., & Uzcanga, I. (2015). Educación STEM en educación básica: estudio de caso en dos países, Colombia y República Dominicana. Cartagena de Indias: Encuentro Internacional de Educación en Ingeniería ACOFI. Obtenido de https://acofipapers.org/index.php/eiei/article/view/1073/1074
Cilleruelo, L., & Zubiaga, A. (2014). Una aproximación a la Educación STEAM. Prácticas educativas en la encrucijada arte, ciencia y tecnología. Jornadas de psicodidáctica, 1-18. Obtenido de https://www.augustozubiaga.com/web/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/STEM-TO-STEAM.pdf
Cortés, H., Gallego, L., & Rodriguez, G. (2011). The engineering faculty today: An approach towards consolidating academic indicators. Ingenieria e Investigacion, 31(Supp. 1), 74-90. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/iei/v31s1/v31s1a10.pdf
Couso, D., Jiménez, R., Refojo, C., & Sacristán, J. (2020). Enseñando ciencia con ciencia. Obtenido de Fundación española para la ciencia y la tecnología: https://www.fecyt.es/es/system/files/publications/attachments/2020/03/ensenando-ciencia-con-ciencia-web.pdf
Craig, C., Evans, P., Verma, R., Stokes, D., & Li, J. (2019). A tribute to ‘unsung teachers’: teachers’ influences on students enrolling in STEM programs with the intent of entering STEM careers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 335–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1523390
Daugherty, M., Carter, V., & Sumner, A. (2021). Standards for technological and engineering literacy and STEM education. Technology and engineering teacher, 32-38.
Domènech, J. (2018). Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos en el marco STEM. Componentes didácticas para la Competencia Científica. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 2(2), 29-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2018.2.2.4524
Fernández, C., Torío, S., García, O., & Inda, M. (2019). Apoyo parental, creencias de autoeficacia, resultados esperados e intereses en Ciencia, Tecnología, Ingeniería y Matemáticas (STEM). Universitaqs psychologica, 18(2). Obtenido de https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/18496
Fiszbein, A., Oviedo, M., & Stanton, S. (2018). Educación técnica y formación profesional en América Latina y el Caribe: Desafíos y oportunidades. Santiago de Chile: Corporación Andina de Fomento.
García, A., Camacho, A., & García, F. (2019). La brecha de género en el sector STEM en América Latina: una propuesta europea. V Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad (CINAIC), 704-709.
García, F., Bello, A., Domínguez, A., & Romero, R. (2020). Informe del W-STEM International Leadership Summit World Café. Obtenido de W-STEM Consortium: https://repositorio.grial.eu/bitstream/grial/2082/1/W-STEM-WorldCafe_ES.pdf
García, G., & Romero, J. (2018). Matemáticas para todos en tiempos de la inclusión como imperativo. Un estudio sobre el programa Todos a Aprender. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 1(74), 289-310. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcde/n74/0120-3916-rcde-74-00289.pdf
Gilson, C., & Matthews, M. (2019). Case Study of a New Engineering Early College High School: Advancing Educational Opportunities for Underrepresented Students in an Urban Area. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(3), 235–267. Obtenido de https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19840024
Gómez, L. (2018). Enfoque STE(A)M en Colombia: inicios, perspectivas y posibilidades. Magazine RD&I Marymount, 1(1), 27-31. Obtenido de https://www.marymount.edu.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/RDI-v5.pdf
Gómez, M., Duque, M., & Uzcanga, I. (2018). Educación por competencias, currículo y didáctica: estudio de caso en dos países, Colombia y República Dominicana. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa (RECIE, 2(1), 43–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2018.v2i1.pp43-50
Han, X., & Appelbaum, R. (2018). China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195347
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). México, D.F.: McGraw-Hill.
Kanobel, y otros. (2019). Educación STEM/STEAM: Apuestas hacia la formación, impacto y proyección de seres críticos . Santa Ana de Coro: Fondo Editorial Universitario Servando Garcés.
Kant, J., Burckhard, S., & Meyers, R. (2018). Engaging high school girls in native american culturally responsive STEAM activities. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 18(5), 15-25. Obtenido de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1170097
López, S., & Jiménez, M. (2020). Profesores de Ciencias: reflexiones, desafíos y retos para la educación en ciencias naturales. Uni-Pluriversidad, 20(1), 11-17. doi:10.17533/udea.unipluri.20.1.01
López, V., Couso, D., & Simarro, C. (2020). Educación STEM en y para un mundo digital: el papel de las herramientas digitales en el desempeño de prácticas científicas, ingenieriles y matemáticas. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 20(62), 1-29. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.410011
Lucietto, A. (2017). Engineering Technology students - How do They compare to other STEM students? . Obtenido de ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28264
McGee, E. (2016). Devalued Black and Latino Racial Identities: A By-Product of STEM College Culture? American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1626–1662. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216676572
Meadows, M. (2016). Where are all the talented girls? How can we help them achieve in science technology engineering and mathematics? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(2), 29-42. Obtenido de https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3316/773ec960018e2969dab5619ee533f3b8f0f3.pdf?_ga=2.210282837.1347730569.1629834055-919971638.1626022278
Nowikowski, S. (2017). Successful with STEM? A qualitative case study of pre-service teacher perceptions. Qualitative Report, 22(9), 2312–2333. Obtenido de https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2893&context=tqr
Perales, J., & Aguilera, D. (2020). Ciencia-Tecnología-Sociedad vs STEM: ¿evolución, revolución o disyunción? Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 4(1), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2020.4.1.5826
Prezhdarova, V., & Pastarmadzhieva, D. (2020). Ensuring the security of youth in the online world: the potential of the digital art and steam education. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 18(3), 183-188. doi:https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2020.03.001
Que, Z., & Xu, Z. (2019). A data-driven health prognostics approach for steam turbines based on Xgboost and DTW. IEEE Access, 7, 93131–93138. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927488
Serna, E. (2017). Investigación Formativa en Ingeniería. Medellín: Instituto Antioqueño de Investigación.
UNESCO. (2010). Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientifi c and Cultural Organization.
Wu, S., & Rau, M. (2019). How students learn content in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) through drawing activities. Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 87-120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09467-3
Zhao, J., Yang, Y., Yang, C., Tian, Y., Han, Y., Liu, J., . . . Que, W. (2018). A hydrophobic surface enabled salt-blocking 2D Ti 3 C 2 MXene membrane for efficient and stable solar desalination. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 6(33), 16196-16204. doi:10.1039/C8TA05569F
Zizka, L., McGunagle, D., & Clark, P. (2021). Sustainability in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) programs: Authentic engagement through a community-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123715
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Española de Educación Comparada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Acknowledgement – Non Commercial (by-nc): Generation of derivated Works is allowed as long as a commercial use is not developed. The original work cannot be used with commercial aims.
This journal does not apply any fee to the authors by the filing or processing of articles.
