Trabajo colegiado entre docentes de posgrado en el marco de los ODS. El caso de Perú y México

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.49.2026.45289

Keywords:

professors, postgraduate, practice, collegiate work, comparative study

Abstract

The objective of the article was to analyse the opinions of postgraduate teachers from two higher education institutions in Peru and Mexico on collegial work in teaching activities, as part of an international project involving 21 universities in Latin America. The questionnaire was used to select indicators of university teaching excellence in six disciplinary areas, and then semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the results in more depth. Although the institutions differ in size, faculty profile and type of support, the comparative analysis revealed several similarities, among which the following stand out Teachers jointly develop different actions and resources to promote educational quality and improve their individual development; they recognise that coordination of efforts and cordiality are key to co-teaching and to increasing students' learning opportunities; better results are achieved when working with colleagues from related fields of knowledge and with common professional goals; and there is interest in innovative teaching methods, strategies and resources; positive interpersonal relationships and free association facilitate the constant exchange of ideas, habits, beliefs, practical knowledge and, in some cases, the creation of collective learning spaces between teachers and students; finally, the use of good humour, empathy and camaraderie contribute to improving the emotional and social climate in the classroom as well as institutional belonging; co-teaching and the extension of professional ties are important incentives for the internationalisation of postgraduate programmes and the training of highly competitive and socially responsible students. to analyze the opinions of graduate-level faculty from two higher education institutions in Peru and Mexico regarding collaborative work in teaching activities, within the framework of an international project involving 21 universities from Latin America. The Questionnaire for the Selection of Indicators of University Teaching Excellence was applied in six disciplinary fields, followed by semi-structured interviews to further explore the results. Although the institutions differ in size, faculty profiles, and type of funding, the comparative analysis revealed several similarities, including the following: faculty members engage in various joint actions and resources to promote educational quality and enhance their individual trajectories; they acknowledge that coordinating efforts and fostering cordiality are key to co-teaching, which increases students' learning opportunities; better results are achieved when collaborating with colleagues from related fields of knowledge, with shared professional objectives and an interest in innovating teaching methods, strategies, and resources; positive interpersonal relationships and free association facilitate the continuous exchange of ideas, habits, beliefs, practical knowledge, and, in some cases, the creation of collective learning spaces between faculty and students; finally, the use of humor, empathy, and camaraderie contributes to improving the emotional and social climate in the classroom, as well as institutional belonging; co-teaching and the expansion of professional ties are important incentives for the internationalization of graduate programs and the training of highly competitive and socially responsible students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M., Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: the role of organizational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903

Almansour, S. (2015). The challenges of international collaboration: Perspectives from Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1118201

Arango-Vásquez, S. I., y Manrique-Losada, B. (2023). Interacciones comunicativas y colaboración mediada por entornos virtuales de aprendizaje universitarios. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 23(76), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.544981

Branco, G. B.; Pinto, M. M. (2022). Internal organizational communication as a determining factor in work performance. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, Araraquara, 17(4), 2931-2947, https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v17i4.17497

Brunner, J.J., Alarcón, M. y Adasme, B. (2024). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica. Informe 2024. Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo (CINDA).

Dobrow, R. y Tosti-Kharas, J. (2012). Listen to your heart? Calling and receptivity to career advice, Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 264-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711434412

Cambio paradigmático de la profesionalización docente en la universidad. Perspectiva comparada, políticas, agendas y narrativas de la experiencia [PROFESUP]. (2025, 15 de febrero). Inicio. https://profesup.webnode.es/

Castro, R. y Contreras, P. (2021). Con-enseñanza y relaciones de alteridad en educación. Editorial Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción.

Castro, A. J., Kelly, J., & Shih, M. (2010). Resilience Strategies for New Teachers in High-Needs Areas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (3), 622-629.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.010

Conferencia Regional de Educación Superior [CRES] (1998). La educación superior en el siglo XXI. Visión y acción. Centro Regional para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe. CRESALAC

Enríquez, E. (2002) La institución y las organizaciones en la educación y la formación. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras-UBA. Ediciones Novedades Educativas.

Fernández, L. (2012). Instituciones educativas. Dinámicas institucionales en situaciones críticas. Paidós. Grupo e Instituciones.

Fernández-Cruz, M.; Fernández, V. B.; Munoz, L. y López, S. (2024). Transformation of Higher Education: Discussion of the Dimensions, Trends and Scenarios of Change in Ibero-America. Educ. Sci.,14, 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050523

Fernández Cruz, M., & Romero López, A. (2010). Indicadores de excelencia docente en la Universidad de Granada. Revista Portuguesa De Pedagogia, (44-1), p. 83-117. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8614_44-1_4

Hargreaves, A. y O´Connor, M. (2020). Profesionalismo colaborativo. Cuando enseñar supone el aprendizaje de todos (Trad. P. Carvajal y B. García). Ediciones Morata.

Henríquez, P. (2018). Tendencias de la educación superior en América Latina. Instituto Internacional de la UNESCO para la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe. IESALC

Hurts, B. y Reding, G. (2002). Teachers mentoring teachers, Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Idris, K. M. (2023). Tensions of Embedding Reflective Teaching Practices in Teacher Education in Eritrea: A Self-Study on Facilitation Experiences. Studying Teacher Education, 19(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2023.2202012

Kelly, N., Doyle, J.& Parker, M. (2019): Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams. Higher Education Research & Development, 39 (2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1676199

Khan, N. (2019). The Impact of Organizational Climate on Teachers Commitment, Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(2), 327-342. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2320930845?sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journal

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Li, H., Chen, X, Chen X. & Shan, C. (2024) Exploring relationship between teacher humor and online learning burnout. Educational Psychology, 44(9-10), 1073-1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2024.2438710

Newman, J. (2024) Incentivising interdisciplinary research collaboration: evidence from Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 46(2), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2023.2267719

Nimet, C. A., Cihat, A. y Eteve, W. (2021) Humour as a pedagogical tool in teacher-initiated repair sequences: the case of extreme case formulations and candidate hearing, Classroom Discourse, 12(3), 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1910051

Oficina Regional de Educación para América Latina y el Caribe [OREALC] (2013). Situación Educativa de América Latina y el Caribe: Hacia la educación de calidad para todos al 2015. OREALC/UNESCO

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO, siglas en inglés] (2017). Educación para los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Objetivos de aprendizaje. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000252423

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO, siglas en inglés]. (2022). Contribuciones de la educación superior a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: marco analítico. UNESCO.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO, siglas en inglés] (2023). Avances hacia el ODS 4 en educación superior: desafíos y respuestas políticas en América Latina y el Caribe. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384366

Perrenoud, P. (2010). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Graó.

Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú [PUCP] (2024). Modelo educativo PUCP. https://www.pucp.edu.pe/documento/modelo-educativo-pucp/

Pujol-Cols, L., & Lazzaro-Salazar, M. (2021). Vocación de carrera en académicos de una universidad pública en Argentina. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 12(34), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2021.34.979

Quacquarelli Symonds [QS] (2025, 21 de abril). Lenses and indicators. https://support.qs.com/hc/en-gb/sections/360005689220-Lenses-and-Indicators

Quijada, K. Y. (2019). El Mentoring en la academia: experiencias y avatares de los profesores de la Universidad de Colima y la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa. Revista del Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana de México, 34(96), 239-273. https://sociologicamexico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/Sociologica/%20article/view/1504

Quijada, K. Y. y Gómez-Nashiki, A. (2023). El mentoring y las redes de apoyo en la formación de las investigadoras de una universidad mexicana. En M.C. Fernández, G. Mora y C. Briceño (Eds.), Género y educación: reflexiones para la igualdad en tiempos de crisis (211-246). Universidad Católica de Temuco.

Ramos, A.M. (2016). La colaboración docente en la educación superior. Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Granada, (23), 267-279. https://produccioncientifica.ugr.es/documentos/63dc629736479d3e033d2651?lang=en

Razeto, A. (2017). Más confianza para una mejor escuela: el valor de las relaciones interpersonales entre profesores y director. Cuadernos De Investigación Educativa, 8(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.18861/cied.2017.8.1.2639

Ricci, L., Zetlin, A. y Osipova, A. (2017). Preservice special educators’ perceptions of collaboration and co-teaching during university fieldwork: implications for personnel preparation. Teacher Development, 21(5), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1293561

Salokangas, M.; Ainscow, M. (2017). Inside the autonomous school: making sense of a global educational trend. Routledge.

Sánchez, M.A., y Coronil, A. (2019). Desarrollo de un equipo docente en la coordinación del profesorado en el ámbito universitario, Alteridad 14(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v14n1.2019.08.

Schön, D. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos: hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Paidós.

Schön, D. (1998). El profesional reflexivo: cómo piensan los profesionales cuando actúan. Paidós.

Shavard, G. (2022). From school improvement to student cases: teacher collaborative work as a context for professional development, Professional Development in Education, (48)3, 493-505. DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2021.1879216

Silva, A. M. C., & Aparício, M. (2023). Biographical narratives in teaching: a study of professors on postgraduate courses. European Journal of Education, 6(2), 108–118. https://revistia.org/index.php/ejed/article/view/6117

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada (E. Zimmerman, Trad.). Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia (Trabajo original Publicado en 1998).

Travers, Ch., y Cooper, C. (1997). El estrés de los profesores. La presión en la actividad docente, Paidós.

Tinnell, T., Tretter, T., Thornburg, W.& Ralston P. (2019) Successful Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Supporting Science Teachers with a Systematic, Ongoing, Intentional Collaboration Between University Engineering and Science Teacher Education Faculty. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 621-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1593086

Universidad de Colima [UdeC] (2016). Modelo educativo. Plan institucional de desarrollo 2014-2017. https://www.ucol.mx/documentos-normateca/ver/v2/modelos/Modelo-educativo-2014-2017/

Vescio, V., Ross, D., and Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80–91. https: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.

Published

2025-12-27

How to Cite

Quijada Lovatón, K. Y., & Gómez Nashiki, A. (2025). Trabajo colegiado entre docentes de posgrado en el marco de los ODS. El caso de Perú y México. Revista Española de Educación Comparada, (49), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.49.2026.45289

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.