Internet and social cognition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rdh.33.2018.19323

Keywords:

Internet, Social cognition, Psychological processes, Social media

Abstract

The social nature of human beings predicts that only relatively weak relationships can be maintained without face to face interaction. Digital revolution and the pervasive presence of technology enable us to communicate, entertain us, play and get information without interacting with other people. Several authors sustain that Internet use affects our emotions, mind, and behavior causing a deficit in our capacity to interact with other people (social cognition) and even causing disorders in mental health (Greenfield, 2015). In this paper, we review the state of the art arguing that exists a psycho-pathologization of social cognition in the digital culture and that Internet, videogames, social media, or virtual reality are not obstacles to social well-being.

 

Downloads

Author Biography

Aníbal Monasterio Astobiza, Universidad del País Vasco

Aníbal Monasterio Astobiza es graduado en Filosofía por la Universidad de Deusto, Máster en Psicología Social por la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea y Doctor en Ciencias Cognitivas y Humanidades por la Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. Actualmente es investigador posdoctoral del Gobierno Vasco, ILCLI, visitante académico en el Oxford-Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford y colaborador del IFS-CSIC. Investiga en la intersección de las ciencias cognitivas, biológicas y sociales y ha publicado sobre estos y otros temas . Sus áreas de especialización son la filosofía de la ciencia cognitiva, concretamente la cognición social, historia de la psicología y neurociencia. Entre sus áreas de interés se encuentran la Bioética/Neuroética (tecnologías de biomejora, psicología moral, ética experimental), Filosofía de la Neurociencia (reduccionismo teórico), Neurofilosofía (evolución de la mente y cognición), Filosofía de la Psiquiatría (continuo nosológico, psicopatología), teoría de la accción/agencia, comportamiento animal colectivo, cooperación y altruismo.

References

Bell, V. (2007). Online information, extreme communities and internet therapy: Is the internet good for our mental health? Journal of Mental Health, 16, 4, pp.445-457.

CNN (2005, 22 abril). E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'. Disponible en: http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/22/text.iq/

Dienlin, T.; Masur, P. y Trepte, S. (2017). Reinforcement or Displacement? The Reciprocity of FtF, IM, and SNS Communication and Their Effects on Loneliness and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 22, 71-87.

Dutton, B, Blank, G. (2015). Cultures of the internet: the internet in Britain. Disponible en: http://oxis.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/OxIS-2013.pdf

Floridi, L. (2015). The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. New Cork: Springer.

Gega, L. (2017). The virtues of virtual reality in exposure therapy. The British Journal of Psychiatry (4), pp. 245-246.

Gracia, M.; Vigo, M.; Fernández, M. J. y Marcó, M. (2002). Problemas conductuales relacionados con el uso de Internet: Un estudio exploratorio. Anales de Psicología, 18, 2, pp. 273-292.

Greenfield, S. (2015). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. London. Rider.

Grosclaude, P. (1961). Malesherbes, Témoin et Interprète de son Temps. Paris. Libr. Fischbacher.

Hägerstrand, T. (1988). Some Unexplored Problems in the Modeling of Culture Transfer and Transformation, En P. J. Hugill y D. B. Dickson (eds) The Transfer and Transformation of Ideas and Material Culture ,College Station Texas, p. 231.

Hancok, J., Landrigan, C. y Silver, C. (2007). Expressing Emotion in Text-based Communication. CHI Proceedings, 929-932.

McCain, J. y Campbell, K. (2016). Narcissism and Social Media Use: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture (sin paginación)

Lin L.; Sidani J.; Shensa, A.; Radovic, A.; Miller, E. y Colditz, J. et al. (2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depress Anxiety, 33, pp. 323–331.

Mils, K. (2016). Possible Effects of Internet Use on Cognitive Development in Adolescence. Cogitatio, 4, pp. 4-12.

Prizant-Passal, S.; Shechner, T. y Aderka, I. ( 2016). Social anxiety and internet use – A meta-analysis: What do we know? What are we missing?. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, pp. 221-229.

Przybylski, A. Weinstein, N. y Murayama, K. (2016). Internet Gaming Disorder: Investigating the Clinical Relevance of a New Phenomenon. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 3, pp. 230-236.

Przybylski, A. K. (2014). Who believes electronic games cause real world aggression?, Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 17, 4, pp. 228-234.

Rideout, V. J.; Foehr, U. G. y Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8 to 18 year olds. Menlo Park, CA: The Kaiser Family Foundation.

Salganik, M, Dodds, P. y Watts, D. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science 311, pp. 854–856.

Shapiro, L. A y Margolin, G. (2014). Growing up wired: social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev, 17, pp. 1-18.

Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction error signalling: a two-component response. Nature Rev Neurosci 17, pp. 183-195.

The Telegraph (2009, 13 abril). Twitter and Facebook could harm moral values, scientists warn. Disponible en: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/5149195/Twitter-and-Facebook-could-harm-moral-values-scientists-warn.html

Young, K. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction--and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York: John Willey & Sons.

Published

2018-01-09

How to Cite

Monasterio Astobiza, A. (2018). Internet and social cognition. Revista de Humanidades, (33), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdh.33.2018.19323

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.