The Revista Española de Educación Comparada (Spanish Journal of Comparative Education, REEC), came into being in the year 1995 with the mission of serving as the scientific mouthpiece for the research and work carried out by the educational comparativists integrated in the Sociedad Española de Educación Comparada (Spanish Society of Comparative Education, SEEC), who constitute its principal readers. The publication’s creation represented the realization of one of the primary scientific objectives expressed in articles 3 and 4 of the SEEC statutes, ratified in November of 1994. Since the founding of the journal, the Universidad Nacional de Educación Comparada (UNED) has provided editorial and infrastructure support for the REEC, assuming the role of co-editing institution. The essentially international nature of the discipline of Comparative Education along with the increasing affinity and overlapping of epistemological objectives and challenges of comparative academics at home and abroad – due to the phenomenon of globalization – have led to a decisive expansion of the initial objectives of the REEC, in terms of research and publishing, and of the publication’s target audience. As a result, this periodical does not focus solely or even preferentially on the analysis of comparative epistemology in the Spanish context, but rather it purports to study the construction of comparative knowledge on a European and world-wide scale. The REEC is therefore fully committed to welcoming studies by domestic and foreign researchers working in the comparative discipline, these researchers being recipients of our journal as well. While articles are occasionally published in French or Portuguese, the primary languages of the REEC are Spanish and English.   

The essential objective of the REEC is to contribute to the theoretical and practical development of the field of Comparative Education in a manner that is at once interdisciplinary, global, national and international. Its work focuses especially on the analytical analyses of epistemological developments in the complex comparativist science in our current era of globalization, governance, postmodernism and post-colonialism. The essential goal and ultimate aspiration of the academic and editorial work carried out by those involved in the REEC is the forging of a world society that may benefit from a democratized, inclusive, humanitarian and exacting education, one that achieves a balance between the constant technological innovations  of a connected society, on the one hand, and, on the other, the strength and solidity afforded by  a cultural wisdom accrued through tradition. It is also paramount that we find a balance between the demands of a global society and the as yet vital role of school cultures that are specifically national. The REEC wishes to offer its pages to, and invite contributions from, all those scholars who share these objectives and concerns and who would strive to perfect the theoretical and practical contributions that we can make to current world education and to a global society articulated around the ideas of solidarity, professionalism and morality.     

The REEC adheres to a proven editorial policy that is detailed in the Regulations of this journal. Some of its noteworthy elements are the joint efforts carried out by authors, editors and reviewers in assuring the smooth workings of the REEC; the editorial practice of the double-blind peer review; and a rigorous publishing ethic designed to detect and root out any possible editorial misconduct.

Acknowledgement – Non Commercial (by-nc): Generation of derivated Works is allowed as long as a commercial use is not developed. The original work cannot be used with commercial aims.

Announcements

Assessment of teachers´teaching quality

2025-07-15

Monograph: Assessment of teachers´teaching quality

Coordinators:

Carmen-María Fernández- García (Universidad de Oviedo)

Mercedes Inda-Caro (Universidad de Oviedo)

Ridwan Maulana (Universidad de Groningen)

 

In the 21st century, education is unarguably a cornerstone in the idea of a prosperous, more equitable, developed society. Achieving quality education is therefore one of the sustainable development goals established by the United Nations in its 2030 Agenda. Many different agents are involved in the education process, and analysing the results students achieve through those processes is complex, as they are affected by numerous factors. There is no doubt that students’ backgrounds, as well as various individual and environmental elements, along with organizational elements related to their schools, must be considered in order to properly interpret their achievements, difficulties, and learning.

Focusing specifically on what happens in the classroom in all stages of the formal education system, we can say that teachers’ initial and ongoing training may be more or less adequate in terms of mastery of the competencies they need to properly plan their various subjects, control their classrooms, and analyse the relationships that arise in them. To be a good teacher, therefore, it is not enough to know the subject one is teaching, one must also master the strategies to ensure that knowledge reaches the students in the best way possible (Darling – Hammond & Sykes, 2003; Kaplan & Owings, 2002; Maulana et al., 2023a; Reoyo et al., 2017). Throughout their working lives, teachers may need help and support (Conway & Clark, 2003; Kini & Podolsky, 2016; Panayiotis et al., 2011; Verástegui et al., 2022), be that from specialists or from colleagues, with whom they can develop strategies to effectively cope with the challenges that they face every day in the classroom.

Making the most realistic possible assessment of the strengths and weaknesses in teaching competence, not to punish but rather to educate, is an interesting way of providing this support to teachers and their professional development. It is also an interesting dimension to consider as a reference in teachers’ initial and continued training, providing them with a disciplinary background against which they can consider their own teaching practice.

Various different models and instruments have attempted to identify the teaching dimensions, in various educational settings, that may serve as a basis for this professional development and for reflection and evaluation of teaching quality (Maulana et al., 2023a). However, there is no consensus about how best to do this assessment, nor about the most relevant procedures for evaluating teaching activity. Some cases have opted for quantitative approaches (checklists, various types of questionnaire), others more qualitative (observation, group discussion, self-analysis diaries); some have used students as informants, others have used the teachers’ own opinions, those of the educational authorities, or student results as a reference. It is also open to question whether the results of these evaluations should have any kind of impact on professional promotion, salary, or choice of teaching post in some education systems. Although these evaluation systems are commonly used in some contexts (e.g. the USA, Singapore), in Spain—at least outside the university system—it is hard to find systematic evaluation procedures formally undertaken by competent authorities or recognised educational organizations with the aim of assessing teaching quality and evaluating teachers. There is no doubt, however, that proper assessment of teaching quality along with provision of sufficient resources and support from the social and educational policy arena will allow improvement of teaching-learning processes and achievement of much-desired quality education for all.

Hence, suggested questions for the monograph include:

  • What transnational, international, national, and local policies are there in relation to assessing teaching quality? How do educational policies determine teaching effectiveness and quality?
  • What impact can evaluating teaching quality and effectiveness have on improving modern education?
  • What differences are there at international and intranational level in relation to the different models for assessing teaching quality and effectiveness?
  • What dimensions of teaching activity are considered for assessing teaching quality and effectiveness? What other dimensions may be important that are not sufficiently included?
  • What cultural and contextual variables allow us to understand the approach and effects of these different models for assessing teaching quality and effectiveness?

Articles for this monograph may make overall or partial comparison of elements (or all) of teaching quality assessment between different countries (international comparison), within a single country (intranational comparison), or between groups of countries (supranational comparison) referring to any educational stage.

Papers are also welcome that are based on a theoretical or epistemological perspective on the concept of evaluation of teaching quality itself, or the state of the subject from a local (initiatives undertaken by local or regional educational authorities), national (policies enacted by education ministries or departments), or international perspective (European Union, UNESCO, Organization of Ibero-American States, etc.).

Deadline for submission of contributions (articles): January 15, 2026
Publication date: July 2026 Read more about Assessment of teachers´teaching quality

Current Issue

No. 49 (2026): Socially sustainable universities and human rights education: A necessary binomial to face the challenges of the 2030 agenda
Published: 2025-12-27

MONOGRAPHIC

STUDIES AND RESEARCH

View All Issues