From software to hardware revolution in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18823Keywords:
ICT (Information and Communication Technologies), education, competence, university.Agencies:
Universidad del País Vasco, Proyecto de Investigación_Gobierno VascoAbstract
The revolution in the democratization of software has reached hardware. We face a new scenario that incorporates cheap and easy to access hardware, which enables the design and creation of real objects. Faced with this new reality educational contexts must reflect on their practice and adapt to it by redesigning both their digital and face-to-face learning spaces. In this paper, we review the contributions of eLearning 2.0 to education. We take a tour around the diverse and complex educational opportunities generated by the development of blended learning and the active methodologies combined with emerging technology. This is, we investigate the contributions of the Web 2.0 to education and the situation that educational institutions face from the Web 2.0 revolution to the current hybrid learning contexts and the creation spaces or FabLabs that contribute to the diffusion of the fine line between formal and informal learning. The evolution of technology involves the adaptation of learning processes to innovative methodologies for the development of skills in problem solving. In conclusion, the design of learning contexts based on the horizontality of knowledge transmission and construction to contribute, in this way, to the development of technology itself.
Downloads
References
Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. Nueva York: Crown.
Area, M. (Dir.) (2012). La visión y opinión del profesorado sobre el Programa Escuela 2.0 en España Un análisis por comunidades autónomas. Proyecto de investigación “Las políticas de un «ordenador por niño» en España. Visiones y prácticas del profesorado ante el programa escuela 2.0. Un análisis comparado entre comunidades autónomas”. Recuperado de http://tecedu.webs.ull.es/ticse20/media/files/InformeFinal%20Escuela20-Prof2012.pdf
Arsy, K. (2016). Entornos de aprendizaje en una Antigua Fábrica de Galletas. El caso del Espacio Open en Bilbao. Comunicación y Pedagogía, 291-292, 42-48.
Bates, A.W. (2015). La Enseñanza en la Era Digital. Una guía para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. BC Campus. Recuperado de https://open.bccampus.ca/find-open-textbooks/?uuid=da50f5f1-bbc6-481e-a359-e73007c66932
Berners-Lee, T. (2017). Three challenges for the web, according to its inventor. World Wide Web Foundation. Recuperado de https://webfoundation.org/2017/03/web-turns-28-letter/
Brown, M., Dehoney, J., & Millichap, Nancy (2015). The Next Generation Digital Learning Environment. A Report on Research. Educause Learning Initiative. Recuperado de https://library.educause.edu/resources/2015/4/the-next-generation-digital-learning-environment-a-report-on-research
Cabero, C. (2013). La formación virtual en el entramado 2.0: el elearning 2.0. En Aguaded, J. & Cabero, J. (Coords.). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad, 23-51. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Castaño, C. & Cabero, J. (2013). Enseñar y aprender en entornos m-learning. Madrid: Síntesis.
Castaño, C., Maiz, I., Palacio, G., & Villarroel, J.D. (2008). Prácticas educativas en entornos Web 2.0. Madrid: Síntesis.
Castaño, C. (2013). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad. Los recursos de la Web 2.0: su utilización educativa. En Aguaded, J. & Cabero, J. (Coords.). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad, 53-69. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D.Ch., & Bichsel, J. (2014). The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Louisville, CO: Educause Center for Analysis and Research. Research report. Recuperado de https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/9/the-current-ecosystem-of-learning-management-systems-in-higher-education-student-faculty-and-it-perspectives
DiGiacomo, D.K., & Gutiérrez, K.D. (2015). Relational Equity as a Design Tool Within Making and Tinkering Activities. Mind, Culture and activity, 23 (2), 141-153.
Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11-14.
Edutrends (2015). Radar de innovación educativa. Monterrey, México: Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. Recuperado de https://observatorio.itesm.mx/edutrendsradar2015
Edutrends (2016). Radar de innovación educativa de preparatoria. Monterrey, México: Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. Recuperado de https://observatorio.itesm.mx/edutrendsradarpreparatoria2016/
Fleming, L. (2015). Worlds of Making: Best Practices for Establishing a Makerspace for Your School. Londres: Corwin.
García Sáez, C. (2016a). (Casi) Todo por hacer. Una mirada social y educativa sobre los Fab Labs y el movimiento maker. España: Fundación Orange. Recuperado de http://www.fundacionorange.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Estudio_Fablabs_Casi_Todo_por_hacer.pdf
García Sáez, C. (2016b). Educación en entornos Maker. Comunicación y Pedagogía, 291-292, 36-41.
Gladwell, M. (2010). The tipping point. How Little things can make a big difference. Nueva York: Abacus.
Gershenfed, A. (2005). Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop from personal computers to personal fabrication. Nueva York: Peter Lane.
Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifiesto. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, L.; Adams Becker, S.; Cummins, M.; Estrada, V.; Freeman, A. &
Hall, C. (2016). NMC Informe Horizon 2016 Edición Superior de Educación. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Keats, D.W & Schmidt, J. (2007). The genesis and emergence of Education 3.0 in higher education and its potential for Africa. First Monday, 12 (3) Recuperado de http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_3/keats/index.html
Leah-Lang, L. & Pirani, J.A. (2014). The Learning Management System Evolution: CDS Spotlight Report, research bulletin. Louisville, CO: Educause Center for Analysis and Research. Recuperado de https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/5/the-learning-management-system-evolution
Llorente Cejudo, M. C. (2012). El e-learning 2.0: de la tecnología a la metodología. @tic. Revista d'innovació educativa, 9, 79-86
Martin, L. (2015). The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education, Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5 (1), 30-39.
Martínez, O. (2016). MakerConvent: espacio de aprendizaje STEAM. Comunicación y Pedagogía, 291-292, 49-53.
Martínez, S.L., & Stager, G.S. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Santa Bárbara, CA: Constructing modern Knowledge press.
O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Recuperado de http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Papert, S. (1991). Situation constructionism. En Papert, S & Harel, I. (Eds.), Constructionism 335-364. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rosenfeld, E. & Sheridan, K. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 88 (4), 495-504, doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
Rudman, R., & Bruwer, R (2016). Defining Web 3.0: opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Library, 34 (1), 132-154. doi: 10.1108/EL-08-2014-0140
Sbnihi, B., & Eddine, K. (2010). Towards a participatory e-learning 2.0. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2 (1), 1-7.
Schneider, R.; Krajcik, J.; Marx, R. W. & Soloway, E. (2002). Student learning in project based science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410-422.
Sheridan, K.M., Halverson, E.R., Litts, B.K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84 (4), 505-531.
Siemens, G. (2004). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital. Recuperado de www.fce.ues.edu.sv/uploads/pdf/siemens-2004-conectivismo.pdf
Siemens, G. (2010). Web 3.0 / xWeb. Elearnspace. Recuperado de www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/09/30/web-3-0xweb/
Weinberger, D. (2005). Small pieces loosey joined. Recuperado de http://www.smallpieces.com/
UNESCO, (2015). Rethinking Education: Towards a global common good?. Francia: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West-Puckett, S. (2014). Remaking education: Designing classroom markerspaces for transformative learning. Edutopia. Recuperado de https://www.edutopia.org/blog/classroom-makerspaces-transformative-learning-stephanie-west-puckett
Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). Teorías y modelos sobre el aprendizaje en entornos conectados y ubicuos, EKS, 16 (1), 69-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/esk1516169102
