Cognitive Conflicts in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v32i120.995

Keywords:

irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, repertory grid technique, constructivism, implicative dilemma, self-identity

Abstract

The importance of psychological factors in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) is well-stablished in the literature; however, cognitive factors have hardly been researched and, in particular, cognitive conflicts have not been explored for these disorders. The aim of this study is to compare the cognitive and symptomatic characteristics of a group of 66 FGID patients (33 diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome and 33 with functional dyspepsia) with a control group of participants without FGID or psychopathological symptoms. Both groups were matched by sex and age. The evaluation of the clinical sample was carried out following the criteria of the DSM-IV-TR. The SCL 90-R, and also the Repertory Grid for the identification of cognitive conflicts (implicative dilemmas) and self-ideal discrepancy, were administered to both the clinical sample and the control group. Results showed that 85% of FGID patients met the criteria for one axis I disorder of the DSM-IV-TR, mainly anxiety and somatization disorders. Regarding axis II, 23% presented at least one personality disorder, the most common ones being those of avoidance and dependence. Regarding axis IV, the patients reported a higher number of problems relative to the primary support group. FGID patients showed greater symptoms compared to the control group on various SCL 90-R scales. On the other hand, FGID patients presented more implicative dilemmas than healthy controls, as well as lower self-esteem. No significant differences were observed depending on the type of FGID (irritable bowel syndrome or functional dyspepsia).

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Benasayag, R., Mearin, F. ., Aguilera, M., & Feixas, G. (2021). Cognitive Conflicts in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. Revista De Psicoterapia, 32(120), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v32i120.995

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>