La versión española del CORE-OM: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v23i89.641

Palabras clave:

CORE-OM, Traducción, Psicología Transcultural, Investigación de Resultados en Psicoterapia, Práctica Basada en la evidencia, Evidencia Basada en la Práctica

Resumen

Se presenta la versión en español del Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation- Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), un instrumento creado por el Core System Group para la evaluación del cambio terapéutico. El CORE-OM es un cuestionario que evalúa el malestar psicológico a partir de cuatro dimensiones: Bienestar subjetivo, Problemas/Síntomas, Funcionamiento general y Riesgo. Se describe el cuestionario y se exponen los estudios psicométricos realizados, los cuales indican que el instrumento posee un nivel de validez y fiabilidad adecuadas, así como una excelente aceptación y sensibilidad al cambio terapéutico. Con la supervisión y guía de miembros del equipo creador del CORE-OM, se realizó el proceso de traducción de la versión original en inglés. Colaboraron 12 personas competentes en ambas lenguas de diferentes lugares de España; posteriormente 64 castellano-parlantes de distintas condiciones y orígenes lingüísticos participaron en la revisión del instrumento. Así se obtuvo una versión definitiva en español del CORE-OM, de la que se derivaron las versiones más breves resultantes (CORE-SFA, CORE-SFB, CORE-10 y CORE-5) y todas ellas en versión femenina y masculina. Ahora que el CORE-OM está disponible para todos los psicoterapeutas de habla hispana (www.ub.edu/terdep/core), se hace necesario continuar con el estudio de validación con el objetivo de disponer de las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento en su versión en español.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bados, A., García-Grau, E. y Fusté, A. (2002). Eficacia y utilidad clínica de la terapia psicológica. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud/International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2, 477–502.

Barkham, M., Bewick, B.M., Mullin, T., Gilbody, S., Connell, J., Cahill, J., Mellor-Clark, J., Unsworth, G., Richards, D., y. Evans, C. (2012). The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, publicado online. doi:10.1080/14733145.2012.729069

Barkham, M., Culverwell, A., Spindler, K. y Twigg, E. (2005). The CORE-OM in an older adult population: Psychometric status, acceptability, and feasibility. Aging and Mental Health, 9, 235–245.

Barkham, M., Evans, C., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., Milne, D. y Connell, J. (1998). The rationale for developing and implementing core batteries in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 7, 35–47.

Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C. y Twigg, E. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239-246.

Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E. y Mellor-Clark, J. (2010). Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: a guide for the psychological therapies. Chichester, UK; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., Benson, L., Connell, J., Audin, K. y McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69: 184-196.

Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J. y Cahill, J. (2006). A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE System. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6 (1) 3-15.

Barkham, M., Startup, M. y Hardy, G. E. (1996). The IIP-32: development a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 21-35.

Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G. y Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. y Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–Second edition (BDIII). Texas, USA: Psychological Corporation.

Beck, A. T. Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. y Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

Bedford, A., Lukic, G. y Tibbles, J. (2011). Evaluation of risk by patients’ and with clinicians’ ratings: A COREOM and CORE-A investigation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 244-249.

Beutler, L. E. (2001). Comparisons of quality assurance systems: From outcome assessment to clinical utility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 197-204.

Botella, L. (2006). Routine evaluation in psychotherapy service: The use of CORE System data. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 8, 235-241.

Botella, L. y Feixas, G. (1994). Eficacia de la psicoterapia: Investigaciones de resultados. En M. Garrido y J. García (Eds.), Psicoterapia: Modelos contemporáneos y aplicaciones. Valencia: Promolibro.

Cahill, J., Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Twigg, E., Hardy, G. E., Rees, A. y Evans, C. (2006). Convergent validity of the CORE measures with measures of depression for clients in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 253–259

Cavanagh, K., Seccombe, N. y Lidbetter, N. (2011). The Implementation of Computerized Cognitive Behavioural Therapies in a Service User-Led, Third Sector Self Help Clinic. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 39, 427-442.

Connell, J., Barkham, M. y Mellor-Clark, J. (2007). Mental health CORE-OM norms of students attending university counselling services benchmarked against an age-matched primary care sample. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 35, 41-56.

Connell, J., Barkham, M., Stiles, W.B., Twigg, E., Singleton, N., Evans, C. y Miles, J. V. (2007). Distribution of CORE”OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS –R. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 69-74.

Conte, H. R., Plutchik, R., Karasu, T. B. y Jerrett, I. (1980). A self-report borderline scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 168, 428-435.

Corbella, S. y Botella, L. (2004). Investigación en Psicoterapia: Proceso, Resultado y Factores Comunes. Madrid: Visión Net.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures: Manual II. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.

Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., y Covi, L. (1973) SCL-90: An out-patient psychiatric rating scale-preliminary report. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 9, 13-17.

Derogatis, L. R. y Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595-605.

Dias Sales, M. C., de Matos Moleiro, C. M., Evans, C. y Gomes Alves, P. C. (2011). The Portuguese version of the CORE-OM: translation, adaptation, and preliminary study of psychometric properties. Revista de Psiquiatría Clínica, 39, 54-59.

Elfström, M. L., Evans, C., Lundgren, J., Johansson, B., Hakeberg, M. y Carlsson, S. G. (2012). Validation of the Swedish Version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychological and Psychotherapy, publicado online, doi: 10.1002/cpp.1788.

Evans, C. (in press). The CORE-OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation) and its derivatives. Science and Practice.

Evans, C. (2012). Cautionary notes on power steering for psychotherapy. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 53, 131–139. doi:10.1037/a0027951

Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J. y Audin, J. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51–60.

Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., McGrath, G. y Audin, K. (1998). The CORE outcome measure: user’s manual (version 2.1). Leeds: Core System Group

Evans, C. E., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J. y McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcome in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247–255.

Froyd, J. E., Lambert, M. J. y Froyd, J. D. (1996). A review of practices of psychotherapy outcome measurement. Journal of Mental Health, 5, 11-15.

Gampe, K., Biescad, M., Balúnová-Labanicová, L., Timulák, L. y Evans, C. (2007). Slovak Adaptation of COREOM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure). Èes. a Slovak Psychiatry, 103, 4-13.

Gardner, M. y Altman, D. G. (1986). Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. British Medical Journal, 292, 746-750

Goldberg, D. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Oxford: NFER-NELSON.

Goldberg, D. P. y Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139-145.

Goldberg, D y Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Oxford: NFER-NELSON.

Hyler, S. E. y Rieder, R. C. (1987). PDQ-R Questionnaire. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G. y Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of the interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885-892.

International Test Commission (2010). International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. [Página web]. Recuperado de http://www.intestcom.org/upload/sitefiles/40.pdf

Jacobson, N. S. y Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.

Leach, C., Lucock, M., Barkham, M., Noble, R., Clarke, L. y Iveson, S. (2005). Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE-OM and HoNOS outcome measures. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 419-422.

Lyne, K., Barrett, P., Evans, C. y Barkham, M. (2006). Dimensions of variation on the CORE-OM. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 185-203.

Margison, F.R., McGrath, G., Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Audin, K., Connell, J. y Evans, C. (2000). Measurement and psychotherapy: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177 123-130.

Mellor-Clark, J. y Barkham, M. (2000). Quality evaluation: methods, measures and meaning. En C. Feltham y I. Horton (Eds.), Handbook of counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 255-270). London, UK: Sage Publications.

Mellor-Clark, J., Barkham, M., Connell, J. y Evans, C. (1999). Practice-based evidence and the need for a standardised evaluation system: Informing the design of the CORE System. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling and Health, 3, 357-374.

Mellor-Clark, J., Barkham, M., Connell, J. y Evans, C. (2007). Practice-based evidence and standardized evaluation: Informing the design of the CORE system. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 2, 357-374.

Mellor-Clark, J., Curtis Jenkins, A., Evans, R., Mothersole, G. y McInnes, M. (2006). Resourcing a CORE Network to develop a National Research Database to help enhance psychological therapy and counselling service provision. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6, 16-22.

Palmieri, G., Evans, C., Hansen, V., Brancaleoni, G., Ferrari, S., Porcelli, P., Reitano. F. y Rigatelli, M. (2009). Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (COREOM). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16, 444–449.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sinclair, A., Barkham, M., Evans, C., Connell, J. y Audin, K. (2005). Rationale and development of a general population well-being measure: Psychometric status of the GP-CORE in a student sample. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33, 153-174.

Snaith, R. P., Constantopoulos, A. A., Jardine, M. Y. y McGuffin, P. (1978). A clinical scale for the self-assessment of the irritability. British Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 164-171.

Strupp, H. H., Horowitz, L. M. y Lambert, M. J. E. (1997). Measuring patient changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders: Toward a core battery. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

The DoH (Departamento de Salud del Reino Unido), (1996). NHS Psychotherapy Services in England: Review of Strategic Policy. Londres, UK: HMSO

Tranter, R., Bell, D., Gutting, P., Harmer, C., Healy, D. y Anderson, I.M. (2009). The effect of serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants on face emotion processing in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 87-93.

Twigg, E., Barkham, M., Bewick, B. M., Mulhern, B., Connell, J. y Cooper, M. (2009). The YP-CORE: Development and validation of a young person’s version of the CORE-OM. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 9, 160-168.

Uji, M., Sakamoto, A., Adachi, K. y Kitamura, T. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53, 600-608.

Unsworth, G., Cowie, H. y Green, A. (2011). Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: A qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 12, 71-80.

Waskow, I. E. (1975). Selection of a core battery. En M. B. Parloff (Ed.), Psychotherapy change measures (pp. 245-269). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Zigmond, A. S. y Snaith, R. P. (1983) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361-370.

Descargas

Publicado

2012-03-01

Cómo citar

Feixas, G., García-Grau, E., Bados, A., González, E., Corbella, S., Botella, L., Saúl, L. Ángel, Trujillo, A., Evans, C., & López-González, M. Ángeles. (2012). La versión española del CORE-OM: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure. Revista De Psicoterapia, 23(89), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v23i89.641

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

1 2 3 > >>