Impact of intensive programming training on the development of Computational Thinking in prospective teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.27.1.37672Keywords:
computational thinking, programming language, teacher training, evaluationAbstract
Training pre-service teachers in their own Computational Thinking (CT) is essential to build with them the discourse of CT didactics and its inclusion in the classroom with children in early childhood and primary education. This research proposes possible solutions to this challenge and analyses the results of an intervention carried out with 71 students from two different cohorts of 2nd year teacher training students. This intervention is based on the intensive practice of coding using visual blocks through a Scratch project during the first part of a semester course. After analyzing the previous and subsequent levels of CT (pre-experimental strategy) by means of a standardized test for its measurement (CTt), it is confirmed that the intensive training experience allows all future teachers to reach a sufficient level of CT, regardless of their previous experience in programming and their initial level of CT (they all end up learning, either by increasing their level of CT or by improving their efficiency). On the other hand, measuring the learning outcomes in the Scratch project, we see a clear relationship between a high resulting CTt level (POST) and a good performance in the block programming learning task, which is evidence that the Scratch project helps to develop the future teachers' CT.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/37672/28238
Downloads
References
Acevedo-Borrega, J. (2016). El pensamiento computacional en la educación obligatoria. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad de Extremadura]. DEHESA. Repositorio institucional Universidad de Extremadura. http://hdl.handle.net/10662/5356
Acevedo-Borrega, J., Valverde-Berrocoso, J., & Garrido-Arroyo, M. D. C. (2022). Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature. In Education Sciences, 12(1), Artículo 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010039
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 Computational Thinking Curriculum Framework: Implications for Teacher Knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.47
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016a). Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education. Implications for policy and practice. https://doi.org/10.2791/792158
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016b). Developing Computational Thinking: Approaches and Orientations in K-12 Education. In Proceedings of the EdMedia 2016 Conference (pp. 13-18). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). http://www.learntechlib.org/p/172925/
Bustillo, J., & Garaizar, P. (2015). Scratching the surface of digital literacy... but we need to go deeper. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044224
Butler, D., & Leahy, M. (2021). Developing preservice teachers’ understanding of computational thinking: A constructionist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1060-1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13090
Collado-Sánchez, M., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Pinto-Llorente, A. M. (2021). Computational thinking competences training for primary education teachers. In Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21), 758-762. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486544
Dobgenski, J., & Garcia Silva, A da F. (2022). A practical experience in pre-service teacher education focusing on computational thinking. 12th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12), Feb 2022, Bozen-Bolzano, Italia. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03748506
Estebanell, M., López, V., Peracaula-Bosch, M., Simarro, C., Cornellà, P., Couso, D., González-Martínez, J., Alsina, À., Badillo, E., & Heras, R. (2018). Teacher training in Computational Thinking. Teaching Guide. https://pecofim.wixsite.com/pecofim/guia-didactica
European Commission / EACEA / Eurydice. (2012). Developing Key Competences at School in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Policy. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/93204
Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Angeli, C., Malyn-smith, J., Voogt, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). Arguing for Computer Science in the School Curriculum. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 38-46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.38
Furber, S. (2012). Shut down or restart? The way forward for computing in UK schools. The Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-computing-in-schools.pdf
González-Martínez, J., Estebanell, M., & Peracaula-Bosch, M. (2018). ¿Robots o programación? El concepto de Pensamiento Computacional y los futuros maestros. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 19(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20181922945
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Kong, S. C., Lai, M., & Li, Y. (2023). Scaling up a teacher development program for sustainable computational thinking education: TPACK surveys, concept tests and primary school visits. Computers & Education, 194, Artículo 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104707
Lamprou, A., & Repenning, A. (2018). Teaching How to Teach Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’18). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197120
Li, Q. (2021). Computational thinking and teacher education: An expert interview study. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3, 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.224
Mason, S. L., & Rich, P. J. (2019). Preparing Elementary School Teachers to Teach Computing, Coding, and Computational Thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(4), 790-824. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education https://citejournal.org/volume-19/issue-4-19/general/preparing-elementary-school-teachers-to-teach-computing-coding-and-computational-thinking
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moreno León, J., Román-González, M., Robles, G. (2022). Escuela de Pensamiento Computacional e Inteligencia Artificial 20/21: Enfoques y propuestas para su aplicación en el aula. Resultados de la investigación. Publicaciones Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/d/25861/19/0
Morreale, P., Jimenez, L., Goski, C., & Stewart-Gardiner, C. (2012). Measuring the impact of computational thinking workshops on high school teachers. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 27(6), 151-157. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2184451.2184486
Morze, N., Barna, O., & Boiko, M. (2022). The relevance of training primary school teachers computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on ICT in Education Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer (ICTERI 2021), 3104, 141-153. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3104/paper218.pdf
Pala, F. K., & Türker, P. M. (2021). The effects of different programming trainings on the computational thinking skills. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1090-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1635495
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
Peracaula-Bosch, M., Estebanell-Minguell, M., Couso, D., & González-Martínez, J. (2020). What do pre-service teachers know about computational thinking? Aloma. Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de l’Educació i de l’Esport, 38(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.51698/aloma.2020.38.1.75-86
Peracaula-Bosch, M., & González-Martínez, J. (2022). Developing computational thinking among pre-service teachers. QWERTY. Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 17(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.30557/QW000049
Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105(August 2018), Artículo 105849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027
Resnick, M. (2018). Lifelong Kindergarten. Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Pasion, Peers and Play. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11017.001.0001
Rich, P. J., Larsen, R. A., & Mason, S. L. (2021). Measuring teacher beliefs about coding and computational thinking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1771232
Rich, P. J., Mason, S. L., & O’Leary, J. (2021). Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking. Computers & Education, 168, Artículo 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104196
Román-González, M. (2016). Codigoalfabetización y Pensamiento Computacional en Educación Primaria y Secundaria: validación de un instrumento y evaluación de programas [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_6
Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2019). Combining assessment tools for a comprehensive evaluation of computational thinking interventions. In S. Kong & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp. 79-98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Román-González, M., Pérez González, J. C., & Jiménez Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior 72(July), 678-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the Computational Thinking Test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18(November), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
Rubio Hurtado, M. J., & Berlanga Silvente, V. (2012). Cómo aplicar las pruebas paramétricas bivariadas t de Student y ANOVA en SPSS. Caso práctico. REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 5(2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2012.5.2527
Simpson, S. H. (2015). Creating a Data Analysis Plan: What to Consider When Choosing Statistics for a Study. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(4), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i4.1471
Ung, L. L., Labadin, J., & Mohamad, F. S. (2022). Computational thinking for teachers: Development of a localised E-learning system. Computers & Education, 177(February). Artículo 104379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104379
Wing, J. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. (10 de enero 2014). Computational Thinking benefits society. Social Issues in Computing. http://socialissues.cs.toronto.edu/index.html%3Fp=279.html
Wong, G. K. W. (2023). Amplifying children’s computational problem-solving skills: A hybrid-based design for programming education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11880-9
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Juan González-Martínez, Dra. Marta Peracaula-Bosch, Rafel Meyerhofer-Parra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
