Validation of a tool for self-evaluating teacher digital competence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.27080

Keywords:

Technological literacy, teacher training, educational technology, student teacher evaluation, self evaluation (Individuals)

Abstract

The impressive and rapid development of society is leading to technological innovations that require new technical and cognitive skills. In particular, Teacher Digital Competence (TDC) is becoming increasingly important as an initial step towards better use of Digital Technologies (DT) in the classroom. Nevertheless, to date, future teachers on training programs have no tools to help them self-evaluate their own competence and get instant feedback on how their TDC is developing. This study subjects a TDC self-evaluation tool for initial teacher training – COMDID-A – to dimensional and external validation, in relation to age, gender and access to university. The sample consisted of 144 students on an initial teacher training program at a Catalan university. The results show that the dimensional structure proposed by the theoretical model is highly reliable and has four dimensions: 1. Didactic, curricular and methodological aspects; 2. Planning, organization and management of digital technological resources and spaces; 3. Ethical, legal and security aspects; and 4. Personal and professional development. Furthermore, significant correlations emerge between age and self-evaluation of TDC: in particular, older students self-evaluate themselves as less competent than younger students. No gender differences were observed. The outcomes of this study could provide future teachers and educational institutions with a valid and reliable tool to guide their perception and awareness of TDC development. This tool could be implemented in the formative assessment process of initial teacher training to raise students’ awareness of this competence and give them tools so that they can make significant use of DT in the classroom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mireia Usart Rodríguez, Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Investigadora Postdoctoral en el Departamento de Pedagogía en la Universitat Rovira i Virgili de Tarragona (España). Licenciada en Física, Máster en e-learning, y Doctorada en Educación y TIC. Es profesora de métodos de investigación educativa y experta en Competencia Digital Docente. En esta área ha publicado artículos de impacto y capítulos de libro. E-mail: mireia.usart@urv.cat

José Luis Lázaro Cantabrana, Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Profesor en Comisión de Servicios en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y Psicología de la Universitat Rovira i Virgili de Tarragona (España). Maestro y licenciado en pedagogía, máster y doctor en tecnología educativa. Coordina el Máster Oficial Interuniversitario en Tecnología Educativa: e-learning y gestión del conocimiento. Sus principales líneas de investigación son la competencia digital docente, la inclusión digital y la formación del profesorado. Ha publicado artículos en revistas científicas y ha sido editor y autor en varios capítulos de libro. E-mail: joseluis.lazaro@ urv.cat

Mercè Gisbert Cervera, Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Catedrática de Tecnología Educativa en la Universidad Rovira i Virgili en el Departamento de Pedagogía. Dra. En Ciencias de la Educación, es la coordinadora del grupo interdisciplinario ARGET y el programa de doctorado en Tecnología y Educación. Tiene más de 60 artículos publicados en revistas internacionales y una larga experiencia en el campo de la Tecnología y la Educación. También ocupó responsabilidades de gestión como vicerrectora de la URV (2002-2010). E-mail:   merce.gisbert@urv.cat

References

Area, M., Hernández, V., y Sosa, J.J. (2016). Modelos de integración didáctica de las TIC en el aula. Comunicar, 47, 79-87. https://doi. org/10.3916/C47-2016-08

Banister, S. & Reinhart, R. (2012). Assessing NETS-T performance in teacher candidates: Exploring the Wayfind teacher assessment. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784705

Björk Gudmundsdottir, G. & Hatlevik, O.E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.14 16085

Cabero, J. (2013). El aprendizaje autorregulado como marco teórico para la aplicación educativa de las comunidades virtuales y los entornos personales de aprendizaje. Education in the Knowledge Society, 14(2), 133-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/ eks.10217

Carrera, F. X., Coiduras, J. Lázaro, J.L., y Pérez, F. (2019). La competencia digital docente: definición y formación del profesorado. En M. Gisbert, V. Esteve- González, y J.L. Lázaro-Cantabrana (Eds.) ¿Cómo abordar la educación del futuro? Conceptualización, desarrollo y evaluación desde la competencia digital docente (pp. 59-78). Octaedro.

Catell, R.B. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/ s15327906mbr0102_10

Cosi, A., Voltas, N., Lázaro- Cantabrana, J.L., Morales, P., Calvo, M., Molina, S., & Quiroga, M.A. (2020). Formative assessment at university through digital technology tools. Profesorado, revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 24(1), 164-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.30827/profesorado. v24i1.9314

Esteve, F. (2015). La competencia digital docente. [Doctoral dissertation], Universitat Rovira i Virgili. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/291441

European Commission. (2018a). DigCompOrg: Digitally Competent Educational Organisations. https://bit. ly/2AM8gQH

European Commission. (2018b). Proposal for a council recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning. https://bit.ly/3dnSnhA

Fazey, D. & Fazey J. (2001). The Potential for Autonomy in Learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 345-361. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/03075070120076309

Fundació Jaume Bofill (2016). Aliances per a l’èxit educatiu: Orientacions per desenvolupar un projecte Magnet. DL: B 16977-2016. https://bit.ly/3hDCIwK

Generalitat de Catalunya (2018). Competència digital docent del professorat de Catalunya. Departament d’Ensenyament. https://bit.ly/37AJH5f

Gisbert, M. y Johnson, L. (2015). Educación y tecnología: nuevos escenarios de aprendizaje desde una visión transformadora. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(2), 1-14. http://dx.doi. org/10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2570

Hargittai, E. & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 6237.2006.00389.x

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education.

Hosein, A., Ramanau, R., & Jones, C. (2010). Learning and Living Technologies: A Longitudinal Study of First Year Students’ Frequency and Competence in the Use of ICT. Learning Media and Technology, 35(4) 403 - 418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17 439884.2010.529913

INTEF (2017). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. https:// bit.ly/3hyB6Vb

Kumar, S., & Vigil, K. (2011). The net generation as preservice teachers: Transferring familiarity with new technologies to educational environments. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 144-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784671

Lázaro, J.L., Estebanell, M., & Tedesco, J.C. (2015). Inclusion and Social Cohesion in a Digital Society. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(2), 44-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2459

Lázaro, J.L. y Gisbert, M. (2015). Elaboración de una rúbrica para evaluar la competencia digital del docente. UTE. Revista de Ciències de l’Educació, 1, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2015.1.648

Lázaro, J., Gisbert, M., y Silva, J. (2018). Una rúbrica para evaluar

la competencia digital del profesor universitario en el contexto latinoamericano. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 0(63), 1-14 (378). https://doi. org/10.21556/edutec.2018.63.1091

Lázaro, J.L., Usart, M., & Gisbert, M. (2019). Assessing Teacher Digital Competence: the Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre Service Teachers. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.370

Marthese S. & Shu-Nu Chang. (2017). Maltese primary teachers’ digital competence: implications for continuing professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 521-534. https://doi. org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242

Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6

Pozos, K.V. y Tejada, J. (2018). Competencias digitales docentes en educación superior: niveles de dominio y necesidades formativas. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(2), 59-87. http:// dx.doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2018.712

Redecker, C. & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.

Roig, R., Mengual, S. & Quinto, P. (2015). Primary Teachers’ Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. Comunicar, 45, 151-159. https://doi. org/10.3916/C45-2015-16

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers and Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Sanz-Ponce, J.R.; Hernando-Mora, I., y Mula-Benavent, J.M. (2015). La percepción del profesorado de Educación Secundaria en la Comunidad Valenciana acerca de sus conocimientos profesionales. Estudios sobre Educación, 29, 215-234. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.29.215-234

Slavich, G.M. & Zimbardo, P.G. (2012). Transformational teaching: theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24(4), 569-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6

Spiteri, M. & Rundgren, S.N. (2017). Maltese primary teachers’ digital competence: implications for continuing professional development.

European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242

Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers attitudes towards computer use: A singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1201

Torrance, D. & Forde, C. (2017). Redefining what it means to be a teacher through professional standards: implications for continuing teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1246527

Tourón, J., Martín, D., Navarro, E., Pradas, S., & Iñigo, V. (2018). Construct validation of a questionnaire to measure teachers’ digital competence (TDC). Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76 (269), 25-54. https:// doi.org/10.22550/REP76-1-2018-02

Unesco (2019). Marco de competencias de los docentes en materia de TIC. https:// bit.ly/3bkUp0u

Vera, J.A., Torres, L.E., y Martínez, E.E. (2014). Evaluación de competencias básicas en tic en docentes de educación superior en México. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2014. i44.10

Published

2020-11-12

How to Cite

Usart Rodríguez, M., Lázaro Cantabrana, J. L., & Gisbert Cervera, M. (2020). Validation of a tool for self-evaluating teacher digital competence. Educación XX1, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.27080

Issue

Section

Estudios

Similar Articles

<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.