Precloture filibuster in the U.S. Senate (1789-1917)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.111.2021.31060

Keywords:

Filibuster; obstructionism; Senate; freedom for speech; quorum calls; cloture

Abstract

The filibuster, as is known the parliamentarian obstruction in the United States, has played, and still plays, a key role in the US political system, being an identifying element of the Senate and explains the relevancy of this Chamber. The filibuster is identified with the tactics of unlimited speeches, but historically it has also employed other tactics as the multiple quorum calls motions and the so-called vanishing quorums. This article analyses the evolution of the filibuster in the historic Senate until the approval of the first filibuster antidote, the cloture rule in 1917. Three periods can be distinguished: the primitive Senate, until 1820, where there is not a real filibuster; the classic Senate, until 1880, characterized by the tensions which led to the civil war and its aftermath; and the golden age of the filibuster precloture until the passing of the Rule 22, which established the possibility of ending the debate with the approval of 2/3 of the voting senators. Nevertheless, the cloture didn´t imply the filibuster deletion, as the cloture was rarely invoked until de sixties. The Senate particularism and the role played by senators into the American checks and balances would explain its survival until our days, in contrast with what has happened in other parliaments.

 

Summary:

I.- INTRODUCTION: THE CONCEPTUAL AND LEGAL GROUNDS OF THE CLASSIC FILIBUSTER. II.- THE PRECLOTURE FILIBUSTER: PERIODS, PROCEDIMENTAL FRAMEWORK AND PRINCIPAL CASES. 1. The primitive Senate 1789-1820. 2. The filibuster between 1820 and 1880. 3. The cenit of the precloture filibuster: 1880-1917. III. CLOTURE ADOPTION. CONCLUSIONS

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alfonso Cuenca Miranda, Letrado de las Cortes Generales - Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Letrado de las Cortes Generales. Senado. Calle Bailén nº 3. Madrid, C.P. 28071. Programa de doctorando en Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

References

BEEMAN, R. R. (1968), “Unlimited Debate in the Senate: The First Phase”, 83 Political Science Quaterly.

BELL, L. C. (2010), Filibustering in the U. S. Senate. Cambria Press.

BETH, R. S. et HEITSHUSEN, V. (2014), Filibuster and Cloture in the Senate. Congressional Research Service, december 2014.

BINDER, S. A. et SMITH, S. S. (1997), Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Brookings Institution Press.

BONDURANT, E. J. (2011) “The Senate filbuster: the politics of obstruction”. Harvard Journal on Legislation, vol. 48, núm. 2.

BOSCH, A. (2005) Historia de Estados Unidos. Crítica.

BURDETTE, F. (1940), Filibustering in the Senate, Princeton University Press.

BYRD, R. C. (1991), The Senate 1789-1989: Addresses on the history of the United States Senate. Government Printing Office.

COOPER, J. (1962), Previous Question: It’s Standing as Precedent for Cloture in Senate, Senate Document No. 87-104, 87th Congress, 2nd Session (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, Volume 2, Serial 12445).

DANGERFIELD, G. (1952), The Era of Good Feelings. Harcourt, Braced & World, Inc. New York & Burlingame.

DION, G. D. (1991), Removing the Obstructions: Minority Rights and the Politics of Procedural Change in the Nineteenth Century House of Representatives. UMI Dissertation Services.

FOHLEN, C. (1967), La América anglosajona de 1815 a nuestros días. Labor, Barcelona.

FISK, C. y CHEMERINSKY, E. (1997), “The Filibuster”. Standford Law Review, vol. 49, 181-254.

GOLD M. B. et GUPTA, D. (2004), “The constitutional option to change Senate rules and procedures: majoritarian means to overcome the filibuster”. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol. 28.

KOGER, G. (2010), Filibustering: a Political Historic of Obstruction in the House and Senate. The University of Chicago Press.

MACNEIL, N. et BAKER, R. A. (2013), The American Senate: an insider´s history. Oxford University Press.

MILKIS, M. et MILEUR, M. (1999), Progressivism and the New democracy. University of Massachussets Press.

RYLEY, T. W. (1975), A Little Group of Willful Men: a Study of Congressional/Presidential Authority. Port Washington, N. Y.: Kennikat Press.

SWIFT, E. K. (1996), The Making of an American Senate, Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787-1841. University of Michigan Press.

UNGER, N. C. (2000), Fighting Bob La Follette: The Righteous Reformer. University of North Carolina Press.

WALTER, N. (2010), Progressivism. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

Cuenca Miranda, A. . (2021). Precloture filibuster in the U.S. Senate (1789-1917). Revista de Derecho Político, (111), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.111.2021.31060

Issue

Section

ESTUDIOS/STUDIES