THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN ON THE INTERNET: CLOSED DEBATES AND OPEN QUESTIONS AFTER THE CJEU’S DECISION ON THE CASE GOOGLE VS AEPD AND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.93.2015.15139Keywords:
Keywords, right to be forgotten, Internet, freedom of speech, Internet search engines.Abstract
Abstract:Internet and digital technologies have enabled the development of
powerful communication tools. Along with undeniable advantages,
the online environment presents some risks, such as the perpetuation
of certain negative or harmful information relating to persons. In
this humus, where the total memory of the Internet allows access to
any event in the life of someone without limit in space or time, has
emerged the demand to the right to be forgotten online. The claim of
oblivion on the Net contrasts different rights: freedom of expression,
right to information, freedom of enterprise, privacy, the right to honor
and the right to data protection. Different national and supranational
bodies have had to resolve juridical conflicts of this nature, and
have adopted different solutions. Perhaps one of the most important
decisions in this matter, called to be an historic milestone in this debate,
it is the judgment of the CJEU in the case Google versus AEPD
and Mario Costeja. This decision contains very important statements:
the applicability of European legislation to Google’s search engine;
the exclusion of Internet search engines from the category of Media
and from the protection of the communicative rights; the attribution
of a direct responsibility for the treatment of personal data to the Internet
search engines; and the recognition to the right to be forgotten
of individuals with regard to the links included in the results list of
the Internet search engines. However, the reception of the CJEU’s
decision has not been peaceful. In fact, the Court decision was significantly
distant from the previous Conclusions of the Advocate General.
This paper analyzes the context of the decision, its content, and the
reactions it provoked both among the most qualified legal doctrine, as
in the main parties concerned: Google search engine itself, and digital
Media whose news are indexed.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-08-24
How to Cite
Martínez Otero, J. M. (2015). THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN ON THE INTERNET: CLOSED DEBATES AND OPEN QUESTIONS AFTER THE CJEU’S DECISION ON THE CASE GOOGLE VS AEPD AND. Revista de Derecho Político, 1(93), 103–142. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.93.2015.15139
Issue
Section
DERECHO PÚBLICO EUROPEO/EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Juan María Martínez Otero

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- La Revista de Derecho Político se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo.
- Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).

