Immersive technologies in higher education: faculty profiles and barriers to integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.45535Keywords:
immersive technologies, higher education, virtual and augmented reality, difficulties, multiple correspondence analysisAbstract
Introduction: This study analyzes the barriers perceived by university faculty in integrating immersive technologies (AR, VR, and MR) into higher education. Despite their pedagogical potential, these technologies face technical, pedagogical, economic, institutional, and ethical/social obstacles. Methodology: A quantitative, non-experimental approach was used, based on an online survey of 775 faculty members from Spanish and Ibero-American universities with experience in XR technologies. The instrument included sociodemographic variables and 23 items on perceived difficulties, analyzed through Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA). Results: The MCA identified four faculty profiles: (1) critical and experienced, (2) average or transitional, (3) technopositive or innovative, and (4) selectively critical. Economic difficulties were the most prominent, followed by pedagogical and technical ones. Perceptions varied according to age, gender, disciplinary area, and institutional context. Discussion: Barriers are not homogeneous and are shaped by structural and cultural factors. Technical and economic challenges are more prevalent among older faculty or those in under-resourced institutions. Pedagogical and ethical concerns are especially relevant among faculty in the humanities and social sciences. Institutional resistance to change also emerges as a key obstacle. Conclusions: The study highlights the need for differentiated training and institutional support strategies. It recommends advancing toward longitudinal and qualitative research to deepen the understanding of these perceptions and the impact of educational innovation policies.
Downloads
References
Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 651-657). SAGE Publications.
Algañaraz, V. H. (2016). El “Análisis de Correspondencias Múltiples” como herramienta metodológica de síntesis teórica y empírica. Su aporte al estudio del locus universitario privado argentino (1955-1983). Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de las Ciencias Sociales, 6(1), e003.
AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. (2023). Unlocking the potential: A comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Angulo, G., Lewis, F., Plante, P., & Brassard, C. (2023). Estado del arte sobre el uso de la realidad virtual, la realidad aumentada y el video 360° en educación superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 84, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2023.84.2769
Angulo Salazar, D. B., Andy Shiguango, N. P., Tipan Lugmania, N. D., & Vera Tigrero, M. del P. (2025). Las TIC en el perfil docente: Análisis de los conocimientos y uso de la tecnología. Estudios y Perspectivas Revista Científica y Académica, 5(1), 1495-1514.
Aquino Negrin, O., & Hernández Romero, G. (2021). Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación como herramientas de trabajo en docentes mayores de 60 años: Uso de las TIC en docentes mayores de 60 años. Revista Científica Sinapsis, 1(19). https://doi.org/10.37117/s.v19i1.429
Arancibia Muñoz, M. L., Valdivia Zamorano, I., Araneda Riveros, S. M., & Cabero-Almenara, J. (2017). Tipologías para la innovación tecnológica en docentes de educación superior a partir de un análisis de conglomerados: Un estudio exploratorio. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 17(55). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/55/5
Bautista, L. E., Maradei, F., & Pedraza, G. (2025). Análisis de la disposición espacial de contenido en entornos de realidad aumentada y su efecto en la carga cognitiva de los usuarios. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 72, 39-69.
Bermejo, B., Cortes, D., Oskam, J., Moilanen, T., Loijas, J., Govender, P., Hussey, J., Schmidt, A. L., Burbach, R., King, D., O’Connor, C., & Dunlea, D. (2023). AR/VR teaching-learning experiences in higher education institutions (HEI): A systematic literature review. Informatics, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10020045
Bond, J., & Michailides, G. (1997). Interactive correspondence analysis in a dynamic object-oriented environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 2(8), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v002.i08
Caballero-Garriazo, J., Rojas-Huacanca, J., Sánchez-Castro, A., & Lázaro-Aguirre, A. (2023). Revisión sistemática sobre la aplicación de la realidad virtual en la educación universitaria. Revista Electrónica Educare, 27(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-3.17271
Cabero-Almenara, J., & Barroso-Osuna, J. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: el coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón, 65(2), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202
Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., & Martinez-Roig, R. (2021). Mixed, augmented and virtual reality applied to the teaching of mathematics for architects. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11157125
Cabero-Almenara, J., & Loscertales-Abril, F. (Eds.). (1998). ¿Cómo nos ven los demás? La imagen del profesor y la enseñanza en los medios de comunicación social. Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.
Cabero-Almenara, J., & Pérez Díez, J. L. (2018). Validación del modelo TAM de adopción de la realidad aumentada mediante ecuaciones estructurales. Estudios sobre Educación, 34, 129-153. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.34.129-153
Cabero-Almenara, J., Rodríguez Gallego, M., & Llorente-Cejudo, C. (2025). Realidad mixta, virtual y aumentada: Tecnologías para el aprendizaje. Texto libre. Linguagem e Tecnología, 18, 1-19.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Valencia, R., & Llorente, C. (2022). Ecosystem of emerging technologies: Augmented, virtual and mixed reality. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 23, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2022.1148
Cajas Bravo, T. V., Silva Infantes, M., & Dávila Morán, R. C. (2023). Percepción docente sobre el uso de la tecnología en la educación superior. Revista Conrado, 19(90), 326-335.
Cardona, C., Padilla, L., & Gutierrez, J. (2021). Análisis de correspondencia múltiple (ACM). https://rpubs.com/ocamilocardona/813536
Cevikbas, M., Bulut, N., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Exploring the benefits and drawbacks of AR and VR technologies for learners of mathematics: Recent developments. Systems, 11(5), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11050244
Coban, M., Bolat, Y., & Goksu, I. (2022). The potential of immersive virtual reality to enhance learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100452
Cornejo, J. M. (1988). Técnicas de investigación social. El análisis de correspondencia. PPU.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Escofier, B., & Pagès, J. (2008). Analyses factorielles simples et multiples: Objectifs, méthodes et interprétation (4th ed.). Dunod.
Familoni, B. T., & Onyebuchi, N. C. (2024). Augmented and virtual reality in US education: A review: Analyzing the impact, effectiveness, and future prospects of AR/VR tools in enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 642-663. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1043
Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Jingru, Z., Yahaya, W., & Sanmugam, M. (2025). An educational mobile augmented reality system to enhance undergraduate. Interactive Learning Environments.
Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993906
Liu, J., Liu, Q., Yu, S., Ma, J., Liu, M., & Wu, L. (2024). How do autonomy and learner characteristics combine to influence learners’ learning outcomes and cognitive load in virtual reality learning environments? A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12262-x
Luna, A., Ortiz Colón, A. M., & Rodríguez Moreno, J. (2023). Tecnologías inmersivas en el aprendizaje autorregulado: Revisión sistemática de literatura científica. Digital Education Review, 44, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2023.44.105-113
Marín-Díaz, V., Sampedro-Requena, B. E., Vega-Gea, E. M., & Ruiz-Palmero, J. (2022). Conocimientos tecnopedagógicos del profesorado de secundaria sobre la realidad mixta. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, (23), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2022.1984
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 83, 18185-18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
Menjivar, E., Sanchezs, E., Ruiz Palmero, J., & Valenzuela, T. (2021). Revisión de la producción científica sobre la realidad virtual entre 2016 y 2020 a través de Scopus y WoS. EDMETIC, Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 10(2), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v10i2.13422
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mogrovejo-Zambrano, J. N., Montalván-Vélez, C. L., Barragan-Espinoza, G. M., & Cabrera-Davila, M. A. (2024). Fenomenología de la realidad virtual: Explorando la experiencia humana en entornos digitales inmersivos. Journal of Economic and Social Science Research, 4(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/jessr/v4/n1/88
Mohsen, M. A., & Alangari, T. S. (2024). Analyzing two decades of immersive technology research in education: Trends, clusters, and future directions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3571–3587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11968-2
Mulders, M., Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2020). A framework for the use of immersive virtual reality in learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(24), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i24.16615
Obeidallah, R., Al Ahmad, A., & Qutishat, D. (2023). Challenges of extended reality technology in higher education: A review. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(14), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.39871
Perifanou, M., Economides, A. A., & Nikou, S. A. (2023). Teachers' views on integrating augmented reality in education: Needs, opportunities, challenges and recommendations. Future Internet, 15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Hippasus. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Roco-Videla, Á., Aguilera-Eguía, R., & Olguin-Barraza, M. (2024). Ventajas del uso del coeficiente de omega de McDonald frente al alfa de Cronbach. Nutrición Hospitalaria, 41(1), 262-263. https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.04879
Sales, S., Macédo, R., De Oliveira, V., Souza, W., Gama, L., De Brito, S., & Winkler, I. (2023). Augmented reality in education for industry 4.0: What are the barriers to adoption? Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 15(1), 481-505. https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv15n1-025
Subirats-Blanco, R., & Conde del Rio, M. A. (2024). Integración de la realidad aumentada en la enseñanza del inglés en educación primaria: Mejorando el aprendizaje lingüístico y la adquisición de vocabulario. EDMETIC, 13(2), art.7. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v13i2.17072
Tapia Cortes, C. (2020). Tipologías de uso educativo de las Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Edutec. Revista Electrónica De Tecnología Educativa, (71), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2020.71.1489
Toala-Palma, J., Arteaga-Mera, J., Quintana, J., & Santana, I. (2020). Virtual reality as a tool for educational innovation. Episteme Koinonia, 3(5). https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/epistemekoinonia/article/view/835
Tourrón, J. (2023). Análisis de datos y medidas en educación (Vol. II). Unir.
UNESCO. (2023). Informe GEM 2023: Tecnología en la educación. Una herramienta en los términos de los docentes. UNESCO.
Upadhyay, B., Chalil Madathil, K., Hegde, S., Anderson, D., Wooldridge, E., Presley, D., Perez, L., & Reid, B. (2024). Barriers toward the implementation of extended reality (XR) technologies to support education and training in workforce development programs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 68(1), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241275080
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
Victoria Maldonado, J. J., Fuentes-Cabrera, A., Fernández-Cerero, J., & Sadio-Ramos, F. J. (2024). Influencia de la realidad virtual en el rendimiento académico en educación secundaria a través de un meta-análisis. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 71, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.104279
Yu, Z., & Xu, W. (2022). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of virtual reality technology on users' learning outcomes. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(6), 1470-1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22532
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julio Cabero-Almenara, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez, Julio Barroso-Osuna, Carmen Siles-Rojas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
