Blended learning: panorama y perspectivas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.18842Palabras clave:
enseñanza-aprendizaje, innovación, TIC, interacción, blended learning, revolución educativa.Resumen
La enseñanza se ha transformado, al comienzo del nuevo siglo, con las tecnologías de la comunicación. Los modelos de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediados por computadoras han supuesto un revulsivo para nuevas formas de enseñar y aprender más allá de las coordenadas espacio-temporales. E-Learning, blended learning y mobile learning ofrecen un nuevo universo de interactividad para la relación didáctica. En este trabajo, se ofrece una revisión del estado de las investigaciones y la literatura científica sobre esta nueva realidad que supone el blended learning, analizando en las principales bases de datos científicas su conceptualización con más de 7.000 registros en Web of Science y casi 95.000 en Google Scholar. Los resultados del trabajo demuestran el fuerte impulso de las buenas prácticas y la consecuente investigación en todas las áreas y niveles educativos, competencias transversales, metodologías docentes, y tecnologías y materiales educativos, concluyéndose que las nuevas formas de enseñar y aprender han de ser estudiadas y comprendidas en sus interacciones con los nuevos medios y contextos de aprendizaje, a partir de la irrupción de la revolución del blended learning
Descargas
Citas
Aguaded, I. & Fandos, M. (2008). Web 2 (y 3).0 desde una óptica impresario. Edutec, 26. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2008.26.467
Aguaded, I. & Fandos, M. (2008). Blended Learning: The Key to Success in a Training Company. ITDL, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(8), 1-10.
Aguaded, I. & Cabero, J. (2013). Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad. Madrid: Alianza.
Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing Students' Language Skills through
Blended Learning. Electronic Journal Of E-Learning, 14(3), 223-232.
Bartolomé, A. R. (2004). Blended Learning. Conceptos básicos. Pixel-Bit, 23, 7-20.
Bartolomé, A.R. (2008). Entornos de aprendizaje mixto en Educación Superior. RIED, 11(1), 15-51. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.1.11.955
Basol, G. & Balgalmis, E. (2016). A multivariate investigation of gender differences in the number of online tests received-checking for perceived self-regulation. Computers In Human Behavior, 58, 388-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.010
Borgobello, A. & Roselli, N.D. (2016). Rendimiento académico e interacción sociocognitiva de estudiantes en un entorno virtual. Educação e Pesquisa, 42(2), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201606143478
Brame, C.J. (2016). Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
Burchett, S., Hayes, J., Pfaff, A., Satterfield, E.T., Skyles, A. & Woelk, K. (2016). Piloting Blended Strategies To Resolve Laboratory Capacity Issues in a First-Semester General Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(7), 1217-1222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00078
Cardak, C.S. & Selvi, K. (2016). Increasing teacher candidates' ways of interaction and levels of learning through action research in a blended course. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.055
Cavanaugh, C., Hargis, J. & Mayberry, J. (2016). Participation in the Virtual Environment of Blended College Courses: An Activity Study of Student Performance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 263-275.
Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A. & Picciano, A. (2016). A Study of Faculty Governance Leaders' Perceptions of Online and Blended Learning. Online Learning, 20(3), 52-73.
Cigdem, H. & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors Affecting Students' Behavioral Intention to Use LMS at a Turkish Post-Secondary Vocational School. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 276-U718.
Corovic, S., Mahnic-Kalamiza, S. & Miklavcic, D. (2016). Education on electrical phenomena involved in electroporation-based therapies and treatments: a blended learning approach. Biomedical Engineering Online, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0152-7
Chen W., Zhang J. & Yu, Z. (2016). Learning Outcomes and Affective Factors of Blended Learning of English for Library Science. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 12(3), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2016070102
Diep, N.A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C. & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners' online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.002
Ellis, R.A. & Bliuc, A. (2016). An exploration into first-year university students' approaches to inquiry and online learning technologies in blended environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 970-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12385
Ellis, R.A., Pardo, A. & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments - Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006
Ergun, E. & Usluel, Y.K. (2016). An Analysis of Density and Degree-Centrality According to the Social Networking Structure Formed in a Online Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 34-46.
Evans, K.H., Thompson, A.C., O'Brien, C., Bryant, M., Basaviah, P., Prober, C., & Popat, R.A. (2016). An Innovative Blended Preclinical Curriculum in Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics: Impact on Student Satisfaction and Performance. Academic Medicine, 91(5), 696-700. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001085
Feizalahzadeh, H., Valizadeh, S., Avari, M. & Virani, F. (2016). A Study on the Effect of Lecture and Multimedia Software on Drug Calculation and Prescription: A Systematic Review. Crescent Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences, 3(3), 75-80.
Fernández-Sánchez, N. (2011). Promoción del cambio de estilos de aprendizaje y motivaciones en estudiantes de educación superior mediante actividades de trabajo colaborativo en blended learning. RIED, 14(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.2.14.795
Forbes, H., Oprescu, F.I., Downer, T., Phillips, N.M., McTier, L., Lord, B. & Visser, I. (2016). Use of videos to support teaching and learning of clinical skills in nursing education: A review. Nurse Education Today, 42, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.010
Fryer, L.K. & Bovee, H.N. (2016). Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.003
García-Martínez, S. (2016). Percepciones y valoraciones de alumnos en edad escolar sobre su experiencia de aprendizaje en un programa semipresencial de lengua y cultura españolas. RIED, 19(2), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.2.15398
García-Beltrán, A., Martínez, R., Jaén, J. & Tapia, S. (2016). Self-assessment in virtual teaching and learning environments. RED, 50. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/14
Gawlik-Kobylinska, M., Trochowska, K. & Maciejewski, P. (2016). Civil-military intercultural education and training in the form of blended learning. E-Mentor, 3, 24-34.
González, M.C., Martín, S.C. & Arriba, J.M. (2016). Experiencias de trabajo colaborativo mediante Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación entre profesores. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 29(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.6996
Grant, S. (2016). Peer review process completion rates and subsequent student perceptions within completely online versus blended modes of study. System, 62, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06:010
Green, R.A. & Whitburn, L.Y. (2016). Impact of Introduction of Blended Learning in Gross Anatomy on Student Outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(5), 422-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1602
Guerra, S., González, N. & García-Ruiz, R. (2010). Utilización de las TIC por el profesorado universitario como recurso didáctico [Study on the Use of ICTs as Teaching Tools by University Instructors]. Comunicar, 35, 141-148. https://doi.org/10.3916/C35-2010-03-07
Harkanen, M., Voutilainen, A., Turunen, E. & Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational interventions designed to improve medication administration skills and safety of registered nurses. Nurse Education Today, 41, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.017
Henderson, S., Dalton, M. & Cartmel, J. (2016). Using Interprofessional Learning for Continuing Education: Development and Evaluation of the Graduate Certificate Program in Health Professional Education for Clinicians. Journal of Continuing Education in The Health Professions, 36(3), 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000093
Hinojo, F.J., Aznar, I. & Cáceres, M.P. (2009). Percepciones del alumno sobre el blended learning en la Universidad. Comunicar, 33, 165-174.
Hong, J., Hwang, M., Wu, N., Huang, Y., Lin, P. & Chen, Y. (2016). Integrating a moral reasoning game in a blended learning setting: effects on students' interest and performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 572-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.908926.
Hurst, K.M. (2016). Using video podcasting to enhance the learning of clinical skills: A qualitative study of physiotherapy students' experiences. Nurse Education Today, 45, 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.011
Jeong, J.S., Gonzalez-Gomez, D. & Canada-Canada, F. (2016). Students' Perceptions and Emotions Toward Learning in a Flipped General Science Classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(5), 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-8.
Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M. & Jo, I. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.002
Kintu, M.J. & Zhu, C. (2016). Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), 181-195.
Kumar, S. & Daniel, B.K. (2016). Integration of learning technologies into teaching within Fijian Polytechnic Institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0036-8
Liebert, C.A., Mazer, L., Merrell, S.B., Lin, D.T. & Lau, J.N. (2016). Student perceptions of a simulation-based flipped classroom for the surgery clerkship: A mixed-methods study. Surgery, 160(3), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.03.034
Liu, M. (2016). Blending a class video blog to optimize student learning, outcomes in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 30, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.001.
Lupi, C., Ward-Peterson, M. & Chang, W. (2016). Advancing non-directive pregnancy options counseling skills: A pilot Study on the use of blended learning with an online module and simulation. Contraception, 94(4), 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.03.005.
Maldonado Molina Pagnez, K.S. (2016). Training of Teachers For Acting In The School Inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16, 70-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12127
Maraver, P., Mojarro, A. & Aguaded, I. (2014). Social Network Analysis of a Blended Learning Experience in Higher Education. Research on Education and Media. http://rem.pensamultimedia.it.
Marei, H.F. & Al-Khalifa, K.S. (2016). Pattern of online communication in teaching a blended oral surgery course. European Journal of Dental Education, 20(4), 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12163
Margulieux, L.E., McCracken, W.M. & Catrambone, R. (2016). A taxonomy to define courses that mix face-to-face and online learning. Educational Research Review, 19, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.001
Matsumoto, S. & Kojima, H. (2016). Constructing an Interaction Support System with the Capability of Social Networking Service for a Practical Lecture and Examining its Efficient Operational Policy. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science, 7(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJKSS.2016040101
Mauri, T., Ginesta, A. & Rochera, M. (2016). The use of feedback systems to improve collaborative text writing: A proposal for the higher education context. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.961503
Monedero, J.J., Cebrián, D. & Desenne, P. (2015). Usability and Satisfaction in Multimedia Annotation Tools for MOOCs [Usabilidad y satisfacción en herramientas de anotaciones multimedia para MOOC]. Comunicar, 44, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-06
Morton, C.E., Saleh, S.N., Smith, S.F., Hemani, A., Ameen, A., Bennie, T.D., … Toro-Troconis, M. (2016). Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement? BMC Medical Education, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0716-z
Nicklen, P., Rivers, G., Ooi, C., Ilic, D., Reeves, S., Walsh, K., and Maloney, S. (2016). An Approach for Calculating Student-Centered Value in Education - A Link between Quality, Efficiency, and the Learning Experience in the Health Professions. Plos One, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162941
Pellas, N. & Boumpa, A. (2016). Open Sim and Sloodle Integration for Preservice Foreign Language Teachers' Continuing Professional Development: A Comparative Analysis of Learning Effectiveness Using the Community of Inquiry Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 407-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115615589
Perez-Domínguez, Y., Tellez-Carralero, A., Cespedes-Labrada, T. & Lemes-Perez, A. (2016). The Class Meeting, essential guide for achieving education through instruction in Municipal University Centers. Dilemas Contemporaneos. Educacion Política y Valores, 3(3).
Pickering, J.D. & Joynes, V.C. (2016). A holistic model for evaluating the impact of individual technology-enhanced learning resources. Medical Teacher, 38(12), 1242-1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210112
Porter, J., Kleve, S. & Palermo, C. (2016). An exploratory study comparing two electronic portfolio approaches in undergraduate dietetic education. Nutrition & Dietetics, 73(3), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12210
Porter, W.W. & Graham, C.R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748-762. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12269
Raymond, A., Jacob, E., Jacob, D. & Lyons, J. (2016). Peer learning a pedagogical approach to enhance online learning: A qualitative exploration. Nurse Education Today, 44, 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.05.016
Rienties, B. & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.074
River, J., Currie, J., Crawford, T., Betihavas, V. & Randall, S. (2016). A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blending technology with team-based learning. Nurse Education Today, 45, 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.012
Rubia, B. & Guitert, M. (2014). ¿La revolución de la enseñanza? El aprendizaje colaborativo en entornos virtuales (CSCL) [Revolution in Education: Computer Support for Collaborative Learning]. Comunicar, 42, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.3916/C42-2014-a2
Sajid, M.R., Laheji, A.F., Abothenain, F., Salam, Y., AlJayar, D. & Obeidat, A. (2016). Can blended learning and the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction in Saudi Arabia? International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 281-285. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.57a7.83d4.
Salinas Ibáñez, J. (1997). Modelos mixtos de formación universitaria presencial ya distancia: el Campus Extens. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, 6-7, 55-64.
Santos, D.A., Moriya Schluenzen, E.T. & Schluenzen, K.J. (2016). Training For Inclusive Education and Special. Journal of Research in Special Educational. Needs, 16, 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12184
Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., and Gibson, D.C. (2016). Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58-71.
Struempler, B., Parmer, S.M. & Funderburk, K. (2016). Use of Blended Learning to Improve Nutrition Knowledge in Third-Graders. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), 510-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.04.401
Sullivan, D.P. (2016). An Integrated Approach to Preempt Cheating on Asynchronous, Objective, Online Assessments in Graduate Business Classes. Online Learning, 20(3), 195-209.
Swift, A., Efstathiou, N. & Lameu, P. (2016). Is LabTutor a helpful component of the blended learning approach to biosciences? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(17-18), 2683-2693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13175
Szeto, E. & Cheng, A.Y.N. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: what effects are there on students' social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
Tangarife-Chalarca, D., Blanco-Palencia, M. & Diaz-Cabrera, G.M. (2016). Technologies and Methodologies Applied in the Teaching of Literacy to People with Down syndrome. Digital Education Review, 29, 265-282.
Thomas, A.O., Antonenko, P.D. & Davis, R. (2016). Understanding metacomprehension accuracy within video annotation systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.014
Thomas, G., Duddu, V. & Gater, R. (2016). Blending an e-learning package into a problem-based learning module. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 259-260. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5787.617d
Trujillo-Maza, E.M., Gomez-Lozano, M.T., Cardozo Alarcon, A.C., Moreno
Zuluaga, L. & Gamba Fadul, M. (2016). Blended learning supported by digital technology and competency-based medical education: A case study of the social medicine course at the Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0027-9
Tuapawa, K. (2016). Interpreting Experiences of Teachers Using Online Technologies to Interact with Students in Blended Tertiary Environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 12(4), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2016100107
Turel, Y.K. (2016). Relationships between students' perceived team learning experiences, team performances, and social abilities in a blended course setting. Internet and Higher Education, 31, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.001
Ungerer, L.M. (2016). Digital Curation as a Core Competency in Current Learning and Literacy: A Higher Education Perspective. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 1-27.
Vivas Urias, M.D., Andres-Ortega, S., Gomez-Navarro, M. (2016). Development of Digital Competencies in Online Instruction: The Case Study of the Foundation Subject for the Building Engineering Degree. Red, 49. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/49/8
Whiteside, A.L., Dikkers, A.G. & Lewis, S. (2016). More Confident Going into College: Lessons Learned from Multiple Stakeholders in a New Blended Learning Initiative. Online Learning, 20(4), 136-156.
Willem, C., Aiello, M. & Bartolomé, A. R. (2007). Blended Learning and New Literacies. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society, 2, 3-9.
Windisch, H.C. (2016). How to motivate adults with low literacy and numeracy skills to engage and persist in learning: A Literature review of Policy Interventions. International Review of Education, 62(3), 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9553-x
Wu, B., Hu, Y., Gu, X. & Lim, C.P. (2016). Professional Development of New Higher Education Teachers With Information and Communication Technology in Shanghai: A Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(4), 531-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115621922
Yamada, M., Goda, Y., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., Kato, H. & Miyagawa, H. (2016). How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors? Journal of Computing In Higher Education, 28(3), 326-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9118-9
Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055
Zhu, Y., Au, W. & Yates, G. (2016). University students' self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. Internet And Higher Education, 30, 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.001
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetos a los siguientes términos:
1. Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación de los trabajos aceptados para su publicación en "RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia," y garantizan a la revista el derecho a ser la primera en publicar ese trabajo, igualmente, permiten a la revista distribuir obras publicadas bajo la licencia indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Se permite copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, adaptar, remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material para cualquier finalidad, incluso comercial. Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite e incentiva a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión OnlineFirst (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de su obra antes de su publicación definitiva, siempre con referencia a su publicación en RIED, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión antes y así propiciar un posible aumento de su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
