Integrando aprendizaje-servicio y tecnologías digitales: análisis de sus desafíos y promesas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.1.25386Palabras clave:
Aprendizaje-servicio, tecnologías digitales, educación a distancia, educación cívicaResumen
En este artículo pretendemos enmarcar la incorporación del aprendizaje-servicio y las tecnologías digitales en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje, a la vez que analizar la complejidad de algunos de sus desafíos y promesas. De esta forma, se compromete a los lectores con las preguntas y los problemas que se abordan en los artículos que componen este monográfico de RIED. Buscamos proporcionar perspectivas que puedan contribuir a la implementación de innovaciones e investigaciones pedagógicas que mejorarán la práctica y, en consecuencia, los resultados de aprendizaje. Comenzamos brindando una descripción general de lo qué es y el porqué del aprendizaje-servicio, para examinar, en una segunda parte, el cómo del aprendizaje-servicio en escenarios digitales. Finalmente, exploramos varios temas que pueden dar forma a nuevos desarrollos en el contexto de estas dos innovaciones pedagógicas.
Descargas
Citas
Aramburuzabala, P. McIlrath, L., & Opazo, H. (2019). Embedding service learning in European higher education. New York, USA: Routledge.
Aramburuzabala, P., Vargas-Moniz, M. J., Opazo, H., McIlrath, L., & Stark, W. (2019). Considerations for service learning in European higher education. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education (230-242). New York, USA: Routledge.
Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection for applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1, 25-48.
Battistoni, R. M. (2002). Civic engagement across the curriculum: A resource book for faculty in all disciplines. Providence, RI, USA: Campus Compact.
Battistoni, R. M. (2013). Civic learning through service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher, (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2A: Faculty and students (pp. 111-132). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Brandenberger, J. (2013). Investigating personal development outcomes in service learning: Theory and research. In P. Clayton, R.
Bringle, & J. Hatcher, (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2A: Faculty and students (pp. 133-156). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Bringle, R. G. (2017). Hybrid high-impact pedagogies: Integrating service-learning with three other high-impact pedagogies. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 24(1), 49-63.
Bringle, R. G., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Civic education through service-learning: What, how, and why? In L. McIlrath, A. Lyons, & R. Munck (Eds.), Higher education and civic engagement: Comparative perspectives (101-124). New York, USA: Palgrave.
Bringle, R. G., Clayton, P. H., & Bringle, K. E. (2015). Teaching democratic thinking is not enough: The case for democratic action. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning & Civic Engagement, 6(1), 1-26.
Bringle, R. G., Clayton, P. H., & Price, M. F. (2009). Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning & Civic Engagement, 1(1), 1-20.
Bringle, R. G., Edwards, K. E., & Clayton, P. H. (2014). The roots of service-learning as a means to advance the civic mission of community colleges. In A. Traver & Z. Katz (Eds.), Service-learning at the American community college: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (13-35). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educational Horizons, 77(4), 179-185.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2000). Institutionalization of service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 273-290.
Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34, 164-181.
Centro Latinoamericano de Aprendizaje y Servicio Solidario (CLAYSS) (n.d.a). What is “service learning”? Retrieved from http://www.clayss.org/english/servicelearning_school.html
Centro Latinoamericano de Aprendizaje y Servicio Solidario (CLAYSS) (n.d.b). The concept of service and solidarity. Retrieved from
http://www.clayss.org/english/servicelearning_solidarity.html
Chang, B. (2019). Reflection in learning. Online Learning, 23(1), 95-110.
Clayton, P. H. (2017). Community members on SLCE partnerships. Blog post. Elon, NC: Center for Engaged Learning, Elon University. Retrieved from https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/community-members-on-slce-partnerships/
Clayton, P. H., & Kniffin, L. E. (2017). An introduction to service-learning and community engagement as co-inquiry. [Blog]. Elon, NC: Center for Engaged Learning, Elon University. Retrieved from http://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/an-introduction-to-service-learning-and-community-engagement-as-co-inquiry/
Clayton, P. H., Stokamer, S., Garvin, L., Shoemaker, E., Muse, S., & Norvell, K. (2019). Practical wisdom on “co-” in research on service learning. In J. Hatcher, R. Bringle, & T. Hahn (Eds.), Practical wisdom for conducting research on service learning (pp. 235-254). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Clayton, P. H., & Stout, A. (2017, May 2). Students as co-creators of SLCE. [Blog]. Elon, NC: Center for Engaged Learning, Elon University. Retrieved from https://www.centerforengagedlearning.org/students-as-co-creators-of-slce/
Clayton, P. H., Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (Eds.). (2013a). Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2A: Students and faculty. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Clayton, P. H., Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (Eds.). (2013b). Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2B: Communities, institutions, and partnerships. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Clayton, P. H., Bringle, R. G., Senor, B., Huq, J., & Morrison, M. (2010). Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitive, transactional, and transformational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(2), 5-21.
Conway, J. M., Amel, E. L., Gerwien, D. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: A meta-analysis of service learning’s effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 233-245.
Council of Europe. (2016). Competences for democratic culture: Living together as equals in culturally diverse democratic societies. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
Council of Europe (2017). Council of Europe reference framework of competences for democratic culture (CDC). Volume 3 – Guidance for implementation. 2. CDC and pedagogy. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
Deardorff, D., & Edwards, K. E. (2013). Framing and assessing students’ intercultural competence in service learning. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher, (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2A: Faculty and students (157-183). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Doyle, T., & Zakrajsek, T. (2013). The new science of learning. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Europe Engage. (n.d.). Our definition of service-learning. Retrieved from https://europeengage.org/our-definition-of-service-learning/
Fitch, P., Steinke, P., & Hudson, T. (2013). Research and theoretical perspectives on cognitive outcomes of service learning. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher, (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Vol. 2A: Faculty and students (57-83). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Furco, A., & Norvell, K. (2019). What is service learning? Making sense of the pedagogy and practice. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education: Developing a culture of civic engagement (13–35). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Hansen, F. B., & Clayton, P. H. (2014). From for to of: Online service-learning as both disruption and doorway to democratic partnerships. In S. Crabill & D. Butin (Eds.), Community engagement 2.0: Dialogues on the future of the civic in the disrupted university (12-25). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hatcher, J. A., & Bringle, R. G. (2012). Exploring similarities and differences through cross-cultural comparative research. In J. Hatcher and R. Bringle (Eds.), Understanding service-learning and community engagement: Crossing boundaries through research (ix-xxii). Charlotte, NC, USA: Information Age.
Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Hahn, T. W. (Eds.). (2017). Research on service learning and student civic outcomes: Conceptual frameworks and methods. Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Herrero, M. A. (2017). Jornada de investigadores sobre aprendizaje-servicio. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLAYSS.
Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2018). Foreword: Civic learning: Intersections and interactions. In M. Smith, R. Nowacek, & J. Bernstein (Eds.), Citizenship across the curriculum (iz-xiii). Bloomington, IN, USA: Indiana University Press.
International Christian University (2009). Lessons from service-learning in Asia: Results of collaborative research in higher education. Tokyo, Japan: Service-Learning Center, International Christian University.
Jameson, J. K., Clayton, P. H., & Ash, S. L. (2013). Conceptualizing, assessing, and investigating academic learning in service learning. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment Vol. 2A: Students and faculty (85-110). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Janke, E. M. (2017). Organizational partnerships in service learning. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Volume 2B: Communities, institutions, and partnerships (573-598). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). High-impact educational practices. Washington, DC, USA: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Kuh, G. D. (2012). A closer look at selected high-impact practices. Paper presentation at the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education, Louisville, KY, USA.
Kuh, G. D. (2014). Insuring that technology-enriched service-learning lives up to the promise of a high-impact activity. In S. Crabill & D. Butin (Eds.), Community engagement 2.0: Dialogues on the future of the civic in the disrupted university (92-97). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ma, C. H. K., & Chan, A. C. M. (2013). A Hong Kong university first: Establishing service-learning as an academic credit-bearing subject. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 6, 178-198.
McIlrath, L., Aramburuzabala, P., & Opazo, H. (2019). Introduction. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education: Developing a culture of civic engagement (1-9). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
McIlrath, L., Lyons, A., & Munck, R. (Eds.). (2012). Higher education and civic engagement: Comparative perspectives. New York, USA: Palgrave.
McIlrath, L., & MacLabhrainn, I. (Eds.). (2007). Higher education and civic engagement—international perspectives. Ashgate, England: Aldershot.
Meijs, L. C. P. M., Maas, S. A, & Aramburuzaala, P. (2019). Institutionalisation of service learning in European higher education. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education: Developing a culture of civic engagement (213-229). New York, USA: Routledge.
Millican, J., Pollack, S., Zani, B., Stark, W., Preradovic, N. M., & Aramburuzabala, P. (2019). The changing face of higher education: Economic and democratic imperatives. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education: Developing a culture of civic engagement (36-50). New York, USA: Routledge.
Mondloch, A. S. (2009). One director’s voice. In R. Stoecker & E. Tryon (Eds.), The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning (136-146). Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press.
Norris, K., Siemers, C., Clayton, P. H., Weiss, A., & Edwards, K. E. (2017). Critical reflection and civic mindedness. (2017). In C. Dolgon, T. Eatman, & T. Mitchell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of service-learning and community engagement (168-182). Boston, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 149-157.
Preece, J. (2001). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Preradovic, N. M., & Stark, W. (2019). Identified service learning practices in European higher education. In P. Aramburuzabala, L. McIlrath, & H. Opazo (Eds.), Embedding service learning in European higher education: Developing a culture of civic engagement (109-131). New York, USA: Routledge.
Reeves, P. M., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design considerations for online learning in health and social work education. Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(1), 46-58.
Saltmarsh, J., & Hartley, M. (Eds.). (2012). To serve a larger purpose. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press.
Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. Boston, USA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education.
Sandmann, L. R., & Plater, W. M. (2009). Research on institutional leadership for service learning. In P. Clayton, R. Bringle, & J. Hatcher (Eds.), Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment. Volume 2B: Communities, institutions, and partnerships (505-535). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Reading, MA, USA: ACM Press and Addison-Wesley.
Siemers, C., Harrison, B., Clayton, P. H., & Stanley, T. (2015). Engaging place as partner. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 22(1), 101-104.
Singh, K. (2016). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. New York, USA: United Nations Human Rights Council.
Stanton, T. K., Giles, D. E., Jr., & Cruz, N. I. (1999). Service-learning: A movement’s pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey- Bass.
Stokamer, S. T., & Clayton, P. H. (2017). Instructional design and research. In J. Hatcher, R. Bringle, & T. Hahn (Eds.), Research on student civic outcomes in service learning: Conceptual frameworks and methods (45-65). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Strait, J., & Sauer, T. (2004). Constructing experiential learning for online courses: The birth of e-service. Educause Quarterly, 1, 62-65.
Uvalić-Trumbić, S., & Daniel, J. (n.d.). A guide to quality in online learning. Dallas, TX, USA: Academic Partnerships.
Waldner, L. S., McGorry, S. Y., & Widener, M. C. (2012). E-service-learning: The evolution of service-learning to engage a growing online student population. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(2), 123-150.
Warren, J. L. (2012). Does service-learning increase student learning?: A meta-analysis. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring, 56-61.
Welch, M., & Saltmarsh, J. (2013). Current practice and infrastructures for campus centers of community engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(4), 25-55.
Whitney, B. C., & Clayton, P. H. (2011). Research on the role of reflection in international service learning. In R. Bringle, J. Hatcher, & S. Jones (Eds.), International service learning: Conceptual frameworks and research (145-187). Sterling, VA, USA: Stylus.
Xing, J., & Ma, C. (Eds.). (2010). Service-learning in Asia: Curricular models and practices. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9-27.
Zlotkowski, E., & Duffy, D. (2010). Two decades of community-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 123, 33–43.
Zlotkowski, E., Longo, N., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2006). Students as colleagues: Expanding the circle of service-learning leadership. Providence, RI, USA: Campus Compact and Bolton, MA: Anker.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetos a los siguientes términos:
1. Los autores ceden de forma no exclusiva los derechos de explotación de los trabajos aceptados para su publicación en "RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia," y garantizan a la revista el derecho a ser la primera en publicar ese trabajo, igualmente, permiten a la revista distribuir obras publicadas bajo la licencia indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Se permite copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, adaptar, remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material para cualquier finalidad, incluso comercial. Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite e incentiva a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión OnlineFirst (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de su obra antes de su publicación definitiva, siempre con referencia a su publicación en RIED, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión antes y así propiciar un posible aumento de su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
