Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapy: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Ibero-America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.v35i127.39762

Keywords:

routine outcome monitoring, Ibero-America, psychotherapy, change, implementation

Abstract

Routine outcome monitoring in psychotherapy has advanced significantly in recent decades, especially in North America and Northern Europe. This practice consists of systematically assessing the progress of clients, with the aim of helping to improve clinical outcomes. This study aims to describe the current state of routine outcome monitoring research in Ibero-America, highlighting the main advances and challenges, and to propose future directions for development. The exploration of routine outcome monitoring in psychotherapy in the Iberoamerican region reveals that this practice is not yet widely adopted, with notable differences in its implementation between countries. Although studies on the topic have increased in the last decade, most of them have focused on adult populations. Based on the data collected, the challenges and difficulties as well as the possible facilitators and benefits of monitoring in psychotherapy are analysed, considering different levels: therapeutic, technological and socio-economic. We highlight importance of expanding research through international collaboration, the heterogeneity of approaches and populations, and the coordination between the vertexes of the triangle of therapists, researchers and managers of psychological care centres.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Areas, M., Roussos, A., Hirsch, H., Hirschegger, P., Becerra, P., y Gómez Penedo, J. M. (2018). Evaluación de un dispositivo de investigación orientada por la práctica para el desarrollo de un sistema de feedback en psicoterapia. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 27(2), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.24205 /03276716.2018.1064

Barkham, M., De Jong, K., Delgadillo, J., y Lutz, W. (2023). Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research review and recommendations [Rutina de Monitorización de Resultados (ROM) y retroalimentación: revisión de la investigación y recomendaciones]. Psychotherapy Research, 33(7), 841-855. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10503307.2023.2181114

Barkham, M., y Mellor-Clark, J. (2000). Rigour and relevance: The role of practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies [Rigor y relevancia: el papel de la evidencia basada en la práctica en las terapias psicológicas]. En N. Rowland y S. Goss (Eds.), Evidence based counselling and psychological therapies: research and applications (pp. 127- 144). Routledge.

Bedoya Moreno, J. A., y Muñoz Tabares, E. (2023). El cambio en psicoterapia. Investigaciones realizadas en Colombia durante los años 2015-2020. Informes Psicológicos, 23(1), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.18566/infpsic.v23n1a12

Behn, A. J., Errázuriz, P. A., Cottin, M., y Fischer, C. (2018). Change in symptomatic burden and life satisfaction during short‐term psychotherapy: Focusing on the role of family income [Cambio en la carga sintomática y la satisfacción con la vida durante la psicoterapia a corto plazo: centrándose en el papel del ingreso familiar]. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12158

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

Valdiviezo-Oña , J., & Montesano, A. (2024). Outcome Monitoring in Psychotherapy: Current Status and Future Perspectives in Ibero-America. Revista de Psicoterapia, 35(127), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.v35i127.39762

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)