Assimilation of problematic experiences: Dialogue between voices in the level of Insight
Keywords:
Assimilation, Voices, Insight, Meaning Bridge, Linguistic Therapy of EvaluationAbstract
This paper analyzes the assimilation of the problematic experiences of a patient. It focuses on the dialogue between nondominant and dominant voices in the Insight stage, where this dialogue between voices is seen better. This study is based on a previous one where the role of the therapist in the context of linguistic therapy of evaluation was explored. In the present study, patient’s activities are analyzed, that is, how voices appear in patient’s Insights and how the patient dealt with these voices. Basically, results show the relationship of the patient with her voices on the Insight stage as well as with “the therapeutic voices”. One of the main implications of this study is that data show the relevance of diminishing the role of dominant voices in order to assimilate a problematic experience. Also, data suggest the importance of establishing an interpersonal (between patient and therapist), as well as an intrapersonal dialogue (within patient’s voices) to reach high assimilation stages.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. This license allows third parties to cite the text and use it without alteration and for non-commercial purposes, provided they credit the authorship of the work and its first publication in this journal.
-
Authors may enter into other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
The views expressed in the articles are solely the responsibility of the authors and in no case do they reflect the opinions or scientific policies of the journal.


