Education 4.0-based Method to Improve Learning: Lessons Learned from COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.32320Keywords:
education 4.0, industry 4.0, competency, knowledgeAbstract
Education 4.0 is a model to meet the demands of Industry 4.0. This is achieved by developing competencies during the learning process that will later be used in Industry 4.0. The structural model proposed in this paper has four components: Cloud Computing infrastructures (applied in COVID-19 lockdown period), active hybrid methodologies (applicable in face-to-face, online, and blended learning mode), technologies (through a technological ecosystem), and horizontal 4.0 competences. These competencies have been acquired by integrating the active hybrid methodology with technologies. In the experience carried out, students have cooperatively used 4.0 competencies such as identifying, searching, evaluating, retrieving, creating, and using knowledge during the learning process. Likewise, the students have designed the technological system that classifies and manages all the knowledge created. Measured results show that the proposed Education 4.0 model has led to improvements in learning outcomes and has favoured peer-to-peer learning. The application of the 4.0 competencies has generated a 4.0 product which is the knowledge system to classify, organize, and use all the knowledge produced by the students through their learning experience in an academic subject.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/32320/25343
Downloads
References
Abdul Bujang, S. D., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., y Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Digital Learning Demand for Future Education 4.0—Case Studies at Malaysia Education Institutions. Informatics 2020, 7(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013
Aladwani, A. M., y Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information & Management, 39(6), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00113-6
Ali, M. (2021). Vocational students’ perception and readiness in facing globalization, industry revolution 4.0 and society 5.0. J. Phys, 12050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012050
Coppi, I., y Akkari, A. C. S. (2021). A Conceptual Design of the Competences Circle for the Project Manager 4.0. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 233, 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75680-2_7
Deutsche Meese (2014). Industria 4.0 en la Feria de Hannover. https://www.deutschland.de/es/topic/economia/globalizacion-comercio-mundial/industria-40-en-la-feria-de-hannovern
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Martinez-Nuñez, M., Borrás-Gene, O., y Sanchez-Medina, J. J. (2017). Micro flip teaching ‒ An innovative model to promote the active involvement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 713-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.060
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Micro Flip Teaching with Collective Intelligence. En I. A. Zaphiris P. (Ed.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 400-415). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_30
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Hybrid Flipped Classroom: adaptation to the COVID situation. Proceedings TEEM’20. Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (Salamanca, Spain, October 21st - 23rd, 2020), 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436691
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., García-Peñalvo, F. J., y Balbín, A. M. (2021). Revisión crítica del método de aula invertida desde una perspectiva basada en la experiencia. Innovaciones docentes en tiempo de pandemia. Actas CINAIC’21: VI Congreso Internacional sobre aprendizaje, innovación y cooperación (20 a 22 October, 2021, Madrid, Spain), 659-664. https://doi.org/10.26754/CINAIC.2021.0127
Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., García Ruesgas, L., y Fonseca, D. (2021). ¿Crear y compartir conocimiento motiva a nuestro alumnado? Innovaciones docentes en tiempo de pandemia. Actas CINAIC’21: VI Congreso Internacional sobre aprendizaje, innovación y cooperación (20 a 22 October, 2021, Madrid, Spain), 665-670. https://doi.org/10.26754/CINAIC.2021.0128
Figueras-Maz, M., Grandío-Pérez, M. D. M., y Mateus, J. C. (2021). Students’ perceptions on social media teaching tools in higher education settings. Communication & Society, 34(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.1.15-28
Fisk, P. (2017). Education 4.0 ... the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Peter Fisk. https://www.peterfisk.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together/
Fuertes, J. J., Prada, M. A., Rodriguez-Ossorio, J. R., Gonzalez-Herbon, R., Perez, D., y Dominguez, M. (2021). Environment for Education on Industry 4.0. IEEE Access, 9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3120517
Gaona, G., Lima, P., y Bollati, V. A. (2020). Equipos de trabajo 4.0: nuevas configuraciones. XXII Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación (WICC 2020, El Calafate, Santa Cruz), 376-380.
García-Holgado, A., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2019). Validation of the learning ecosystem metamodel using transformation rules. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.09.011
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Modelo de referencia para la enseñanza no presencial en universidades presenciales. Campus Virtuales, 9(1), 41-56. http://uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/625
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Avoiding the Dark Side of Digital Transformation in Teaching. An Institutional Reference Framework for eLearning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13(4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042023
García-Peñalvo, F. J., y Corell, A. (2021). La Covid-19: ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior? Campus Virtuales, 9(2), 83-98.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., y Grande-de-Prado, M. (2021). Recommendations for Mandatory Online Assessment in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. En D. Burgos, A. Tlil y A. Tabacco (Eds.), Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. COVID-19 as an Opportunity for Global Learning (pp. 85-98). Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_6
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y Conde, M. Á. (2016). Cooperative Micro Flip Teaching. En A. Ioannou y P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies. LCT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 9753, pp. 14-24). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_2
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce, M. L., y Sánchez-Canales, M. (2019). Active Peer-Based Flip Teaching: An Active Methodology Based on RT-CICLO. En Innovative Trends in Flipped Teaching and Adaptive Learning (pp. 1-16). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_2
García-Peñalvo, F. J., y Seoane Pardo, A. M. (2015). Una revisión actualizada del concepto de eLearning: Décimo Aniversario. Education in the knowledge society, 16(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144
Gil-Fernández, R., León-Gómez, A., y Calderón-Garrido, D. (2021). Influence of COVID on the Educational Use of Social Media by Students of Teaching Degrees. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23623
Hansen, M. J., Vaagen, H., y van Oorschot, K. (2020). Team Collective Intelligence in Dynamically Complex Projects—A Shipbuilding Case. Project Management Journal, 51(6), 633-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820928695
Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., y Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: a review. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 14(3), 789-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00672-x
IPMA (2018). IPMA Reference Guide ICB4 in an Agile World (J. Hermariji (ed.); Version 2.3). International Project Management Association. https://www.pma.at/files/downloads/577/ipma-icb4-in-agileworld-v23.pdf
Kinalski, D. D. F., Paula, C. C. de, Padoin, S. M. de M., Neves, E. T., Kleinubing, R. E., y Cortes, L. F. (2017). Focus group on qualitative research: experience report. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 70(2), 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0091
Kipper, L. M., Iepsen, S., Dal Forno, A. J., Frozza, R., Furstenau, L., Agnes, J., y Cossul, D. (2021). Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0. Technology in Society, 64, 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101454
Knopik, T., y Oszwa, U. (2021). E-cooperative problem solving as a strategy for learning mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education in the Knowledge Society, 22. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.25176
LibQual (2021). 2020 LibQUAL+® Survey Highlights. http://www.libqual.org/documents/libqual/publications/2020%20Highlights_v1.pdf
López, H. A., Ponce, P., Molina, A., y Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. Lopez-Caudana, E. (2021). Design Framework Based on TEC21 Educational Model and Education 4.0 Implemented in a Capstone Project: A Case Study of an Electric Vehicle Suspension System. Sustainability, 13(11), Article 5768. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115768
Low, M. C., Lee, C. K., Sidhu, M. S., Lim, S. P., Hasan, Z., y Lim, S. C. (2021). Blended Learning to Enhanced Engineering Education using Flipped Classroom Approach: An Overview. Electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 7(1), 2021. https://doi.org/10.52650/ejcsit.v7i1.111
Masadeh, M. A. (2012). Focus Group: Reviews and Practices. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(10), 63-68.
McKnight, W. (2014). Agile Practices for Information Management. En Strategies for Gaining a Competitive Advantage with Data (pp. 168-178). Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408056-0.00016-3
Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M. R., Rosas-Fernández, J. B., y Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278
Miranda, J., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., y Molina, A. (2021). Education 4.0 Reference Framework for the Design of Teaching-Learning Systems: Two Case Studies Involving Collaborative Networks and Open Innovation. En Smart and Sustainable Collaborative Networks 4.0. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85969-5_65
Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
Nonaka, I., y Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3
Parbie, S. K., Phuti, R., y Barfi, K. A. (2021). Users’ perception of Library Facilities: Evidence from the University of Cape Coast. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4874. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4874
Pérez-Romero, P., Rivera Zárate, I., y Bolaños, M. H. (2019). La Educación 4.0 de Forma Simple. Debates en Evaluación y Currículum/Congreso Internacional de Educación: Currículum 2019 /Año 5, No. 5.
Prieto, A., Barbarroja, J., Álvarez, S., y Corell, A. (2021). Eficacia del modelo de aula invertida (flipped classroom) en la enseñanza universitaria: una síntesis de las mejores evidencias. Revista de Educación, 391, 143-170. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-476
Rahmadani, Herman, T., Dareng, S. Y., y Bakri, Z. (2020). Education for industry revolution 4.0: using flipped classroom in mathematics learning as alternative. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032038
Rocha, Á. (2012). Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Information Review, 36(3), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211241404
Roig, C. (2017). Industria 4.0: la cuarta (re)evolución industrial. Harvard Deusto business review, 266, 64-70.
Santana, A. L. M. I., y De Deus Lopes, R. (2020). Active Learning Methodologies and Industry 4.0 skills development-A Systematic Review of the Literature. Proceedings of the 15th Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies, LACLO 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO50806.2020.9381161
Sarango, P., Mena, J. J., y Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Evidence-based educational innovation model in the framework of Education 4.0: promoting digital information competencies for teachers. Sustainability, 13(18), Article 10034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810034
Schwab, K. (2016). La cuarta revolución industrial. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial. http://40.70.207.114/documentosV2/La cuarta revolucion industrial-Klaus Schwab (1).pdf
Scott, D., Duda, B., y Stevens, R. (2020). 2020 LibQUAL survey report.
Sedlmayer, M. (2015). Individual Competence Baseline for Project Management. En International Project Management Association.
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015). Metodología de enseñanza inversa apoyada en b-learning y gestión del conocimiento. III Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad. CINAIC 2015. Madrid. http://138.4.83.138/congreso/cinaic/sic/
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., y García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Students’ Knowledge Sharing to Improve Learning in Academic Engineering Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2B), 1024-1035.
Sein-Echaluce, M. L., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. J., y Fonseca, D. (2021). Impact of Transparency in the Teamwork Development through Cloud Computing. Applied Sciences, 11(9), Article 3887. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093887
Smallhorn, M. (2017). The flipped classroom: A learning model to increase student engagement not academic achievement. Student Success, 8(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.381
Tenorio-Sepúlveda, G. C., Muñoz-Ortiz, K. P., Nova-Nova, C. A., y Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Diagnostic instrument of the level of competencies in Cloud Computing for teachers in Education 4.0. En Smart and Sustainable Collaborative Networks 4.0. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85969-5_62
Van Lente, E., y Hogan, M. J. (2020). Understanding the Nature of Oneness Experience in Meditators Using Collective Intelligence Methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02092
Vodovozov, V., Raud, Z., y Petlenkov, E. (2021). Challenges of active learning in a view of integrated engineering education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020043
Wasilah, Nugroho, L. E., Santosa, P. I., y Sorour, S. E. (2021). Study on the influencing factors of the flexibility of university IT management in Education 4.0. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 30(2), 132-153. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2021.117219
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ángel Fidalgo-Blanco, María Luisa Sein-Echaluce, Francisco José García-Peñalvo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
