Case formulation in CBT according to a finalistic model of mind

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35674

Keywords:

case formulation, cognitive therapy, hyper-invested goals, dysfunctional beliefs, cognitive acceptance

Abstract

Case formulation (CF) is the necessary prerequisite for any psychotherapeutic treatment, regardless of the theoretical orientation of the clinician. This article presents a five-point CF method tailored to the uniqueness of the patient that takes into account the description of the problem, its diagnostic classification and above all its explanation. The explanation concerns the immediate and remote psychological causes of the specific problem, those that determine its maintenance and finally the precipitating ones, that is, which caused its onset. We call the five points of CF: 1) description of the problem and clinical diagnosis; 2) internal profile; 3) maintenance; 4) decompensation; 5) vulnerability. The theoretical framework within which this type of CF takes shape is that of a cognitive psychotherapy (CT) inspired by a finalistic model of the mind (Miller, Galanter, Pribram 1960), in which the explanation of individual behavior is based not only on beliefs but especially on the hyper-invested goals of the person. Therefore, ample space will be given to the second point of CF, the internal profile, the real beating heart of a good formulation, and illustrated how to proceed starting from the patient's wishes and fears (his goals and anti-goals) to reach his pathogenic beliefs. expressed as inferential rules (ie, as "if ... then ..." sentences). Finally, the important implications for the therapeutic strategy that this type of conceptualization entails and the need to know and apply the principles that regulate the processes of cognitive acceptance will be discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales] (5ª ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Arntz, A. (2012). Imagery rescripting as a therapeutic technique: review of clinical trials, basic studies, and research agenda [Reescritura de imágenes como técnica terapéutica: revisión de ensayos clínicos, estudios básicos y agenda de investigación]. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(2), 189-208.

Beck, A. (1976). Principi di terapia cognitiva [Principios de la terapia cognitiva]. Astrolabio.

Castelfranchi, C. (2012). Goals, the true center of cognition [Las metas, el verdadero centro de la cognición]. En F. Pagleiri, L. Tummolini, R. Falcone y M. Miceli (Eds.), The goals of cognition. Essays in honor of Cristiano Castelfranchi,

(pp. 852-870). College Publication.

Easden, M. y Kazantzis, N. (2017). Case conceptualization research in cognitive behavior therapy: a state of science review [Investigación de conceptualización de casos en terapia cognitiva conductual: una revisión del estado de la ciencia]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 356-384. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22516

Eells, T.D. (2009). Review of the case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy [Revisión del enfoque de formulación de casos para la terapia cognitivo-conductual]. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(3), 400-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017014

Ellis, A. (1962). Ragione ed emozione in psicoterapia [Razón y emoción en psicoterapia]. Astrolabio.

Mancini F. y Barcaccia B. (2009). Come usa la diagnosi lo psicologo cognitivista? [¿Cómo emplea el diagnóstico un psicólogo cognitivista?]. En N. Dazzi, V. Lingiardi y F. Gazzillo (Eds.), La diagnosi in psicologia clinica: personalità e psicopatologia (pp. 157-160). Raffaello Cortina Editore.

Mancini, F. (1996). L’egodistonia [Egodistonía]. En B. Bara (ed.), Manuale di psicoterapia cognitiva (pp. 131-174). Bollati Boringhieri.

Mancini, F., Gangemi, A. y Giacomantonio, M. (2021). Il cognitivismo clinico e la psicopatología [Cognitivismo clínico y psicopatología]. En C. Perdighe y A. Gragnani (Eds.), Psicoterapia cognitiva. Raffaello Cortina.

Mancini, F., Gangemi, A., Giacomantonio, M. y Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2007). Il ruolo del ragionamento nella psicopatologia secondo la hyper emotion theory [El papel del razonamiento en psicopatología según la teoría de la hiperemoción]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 4, 763-793. https://doi.org/10.1421/25829

Mancini, F. y Giacomantonio, M. (2018). I conflitti intrapsichici [Los conflictos intrapsíquicos]. Quaderni di Psicoterapia Cognitiva, 42, 41-64. https://doi.org/10.3280/QPC2018-042004

Mancini, F. y Perdighe, C. (2012). Perché si soffre? Il ruolo della non accettazione nella genesi e nel mantenimento della sofferenza emotiva [¿Por qué sufres? El papel de la no aceptación en la génesis y mantenimiento del sufrimiento emocional]. Cognitivismo Clinic, 9, 95-115.

Miller., G. A., Galanter, E. y Pribam, K. H. (1960). Plans and structure of behavior [Planes y estructura de comportamiento]. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Pearson, J. B. (1989). Cognitive therapy in practice: a case formulation approach [La terapia cognitiva en la práctica: un enfoque de formulación de casos]. Norton.

Perdighe, C. y Gragnani, A. (2021). Psicoterapia cognitiva. Raffaello Cortina.

Rainone, A. y Mancini, F. (2018). La mente depressa [La mente deprimida]. Franco Angeli.

Ruggiero, G. M., Caselli, G. y Sassaroli, S. (2018). Laicizzare la relazione terapeutica in psicoterapia cognitivo comportamentale: la formulazione condivisa del caso [Asegurar la relación terapéutica en psicoterapia cognitivo conductual: la formulación compartida del caso]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 24(2), 203-222.

Saliani, A. M., Perdighe, C., Barcaccia, B., & Mancini, F. (2020). Case formulation in standard cognitive therapy: the use of goals in cognitive behavioral therapy case formulation [Formulación de casos en terapia cognitiva estándar: el uso de objetivos en la formulación de casos de terapia cognitiva conductual]. En G. M. Ruggiero, G. Caselli y S. Sassaroli (Eds.), Case Formulation as Therapeutic Tool in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (pp. 45-58). Springer.

Tenore, K., Basile, B., Cosentino, T., De Sanctis, B., Fadda, S., Femia, G., Gragnani, A., Luppino, O. I., Pellegrini, V., Perdighe, C., Romano, G., Saliani, A. M. y Mancini, F. (2020). Imagery rescripting on guilt-inducing memories in OCD: a single case series study [Reescritura de imágenes sobre recuerdos que inducen a la culpa en el TOC: un estudio de serie de un solo caso]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 10-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.543806

Van Den Hout, M. y Kindt, M. (2003). Phenomenological validity of an OCD-memory model and the remember/know distinction [Validez fenomenológica de un modelo de memoria TOC y la distinción recordar/saber]. Behaviour Reseach and Therapy, 41(3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00097-9

Westmeyer, H. (2003). On the structure of case formulation [Sobre la estructura de la formulación de casos]. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.19.3.210

Published

2022-11-01

How to Cite

Saliani, A. M., Astiaso Garcia, B., Perdighe, C., Barcaccia, B. ., & Mancini, F. (2022). Case formulation in CBT according to a finalistic model of mind. Revista de Psicoterapia, 33(123), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v33i123.35674

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.