Mobile devices and augmented reality in the learning process of university students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.2.17245Keywords:
information and communication technologies, teaching method, distance telecommunication.Abstract
Augmented Reality is an emerging technology having more and more influence on teaching. Together with it, mobile technology is drawn as one of the most effective pairing to support a meaningful and omnipresent learning. However, for it to be able to work with validity, the student must be motivated to use them during the training process, so that the learning process can work with validity. By means of the application of the Instructional Material Motivational Survey by Keller (1983), we have tried to determine the degree of motivation that students, from the Degree of Pedagogy at Seville University (N=148), have about the usage in the classroom of notes enriched through Augmented Reality and available in mobile devices. Through an application designed exclusively for the subject, it has been valued in a positive way by the students who participate in this research. Moreover, we can highlight that the main finding achieved has been the narrow relationship between the students' motivation to use the enriched notes and the degree of success in the subject when using them. Likewise, we can confirm that Augmented Reality benefits the learning process. Therefore, we conclude the validity and viability of such a paring related to the achievement of an improvement in the students' learning results.
Downloads
References
Alaminos, A. (2006). El muestreo en la investigación social. En A. Alaminos y J.L. Castejón, Elaboración, análisis e interpretación de encuestas, cuestionarios y escalas de opinión (46-67). Alcoy: Marfil.
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk, G. (2014): Augmented Reality Trends in Education: A Systematic Review of Research and Applications. Educational Technology y Society, 17(4), 133–149.
Barba, R., Yasaca, S., & Manosalvas, C. (2015). Impacto de la realidad aumentada móvil en el proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje de estudiantes universitarios del área de medicina. Investigar con y para la Sociedad. Cádiz: Bubok Publishing S.L.
Barroso, J, & Cabero, J. (2010). La investigación educativa en TIC. Visiones prácticas. Madrid: Síntesis.
Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.004.
Bongiovani, P. (2013). Realidad aumentada en la escuela: Tecnología, experiencias e ideas. Recuperado de http://www.educacontic.es/blog/realidad
Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517. doi:10.1111/jcal.12008.
Cabero, J., & Barroso, J. (2016). The educational possibilities of Augmented Reality. NAER. New Approaches in Educational Research, 5(1), 44-50. doi:10.7821/naer.2016.1.140.
Cabero, J., & García, F. (coords.) (2016). Realidad aumentada. Tecnología para la formación. Madrid: Síntesis.
Cabero, J., & Llorente, M.C. (2009). Actitudes, satisfacción, rendimiento académico y comunicación online en procesos de formación universitaria en blended learning”. Revista Electrónica Teoría de la Educación: Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información. 10(1). Recuperado de .http://www.usal.es/~teoriaeducacion/rev_numero_10_01/n10_01_cabero_llorente.pdf
Cabero, J., & Marín, V. (2013). Valoración del entorno formativo universitario Dipro 2.0. Profesorado. Revista de Curriculum y formación del profesorado, 17(2), 369-383.
Carozza, L., Tingdahi, D., Bosché, F., & Gool, L. (2014). Markerless Vision-Based Augmented Reality for Urban Planning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 29(1), 2-17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00798.x.
Castaño, C., Maiz, I., & Garay, U. (2015). Diseño, motivación y rendimiento en un curso MOOC cooperativo. Comunicar 44, 19-26.
Chang, H., Wu, K., & Hsu, Y. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscientific issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E95-E99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01379.x.
Che, Y. (2012). A study of learning effects on e-learning with interactive thematic video. Journal Educational Computing Research, 47(3), 279-292. doi:10.2190/EC.47.3.
Chen, C.-M., & Tsai, Y. (2012). Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59, 638–652. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9.
Cheng, Y., & Yeh, H. (2009). From concepts of motivation to its application in instructional design: Reconsidering motivation from an instructional design perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 597–605. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00857.x.
Cózar, R., De Moya, M., Hernández, J., & Hernández, J. (2015). Tecnologías emergentes para la enseñanza de las Ciencias Sociales. Una experiencia con el uso de Realidad Aumentada en la formación inicial de maestros. Digital Education Review, 27, 138-153.
Cubillo, J., Martín, S., Castro, M. y Colmenar, A. (2014). Recursos digitales autónomos mediante realidad aumentada. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 17, 241-274.
De Pedro Carracedo, J. y Méndez, C. L. M. (2012). Realidad Aumentada: Una Alternativa Metodológica en la Educación Primaria Nicaragüense. IEEE-RITA, 7, 102-108. Recuperado de http://www.redusoi.org/docs/LibroActasCAFVIR2011.pdf#page=300
Di Serio, A., Blanca, M., & Delgado, C. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002.
Düunser, A., Walker, L., Horner, H., & Bentall, D. (2012). Creating interactive physics education books with augmented reality. En V. Farrell, G. Farrell, C. Chua, W. Huang, R. Vasa & C. Woodward (eds.), OzCHI'12, Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer Human Interaction Conference (pp.107-114). ACM: New York. doi:10.1145/2414536.2414554
Etxeberria, J., & Tejedor, J. (2005). Análisis descriptivo de datos en educación. Madrid: La Muralla.
Fombona, J., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (en prensa). Posibilidades de utilización de la Geolocalización y Realidad Aumentada en el ámbito educativo. Educación XX1. En prensa. doi 10.5944/educxx1.10852.
Fombona, J., Pascual, M. J., & Madeira, M. F. (2012). Realidad aumentada, una evolución de las aplicaciones de los dispositivos móviles. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 41, 197-210.
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., & Valls, F. (2016). Motivación y mejora académica utilizando realidad aumentada para el estudio de modelos tridimensionales arquitectónicos. Education in the Knowledge Society, EKS, 17(1), 45-64.
Gazcón, N. (2015). Libros Aumentados: Extensión del Concepto, Exploración e Interacciones. Bahía Blanca, Universidad Nacional del Sur, tesis doctoral no publicada.
Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. (2015). Examining young children’s perception toward augmented reality-infused dramatic play. Education Technology Research Development, 63, 455–474.
Huang, W., Huang, W., & Tschopp, J. (2010). Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Computers & Education, 55, 789-797. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.011.
Jamali, S., Fairuz, M. Wai, K., & Oskam, Ch. (2015): Utilising mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659-668. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054.
Jeřábek, T., Rambousek, V., & Wildová, R. (2014). Specifics of Visual Perception of The Augmented Reality in The Context of Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 598-604. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.432
Johnson, L., Adams, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Recuperado de http://blog.educalab.es/intef/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/03/Resumen_Horizon_Universidad_2016_INTEF_mayo_2016.pdf
Kamarainen, A., Metcalf, Sh., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M., & Dede, Ch. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers y Education, 68, 545-556. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.018.
Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keller, J.M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance. New York: Springer Science+Business.
Kim. K., Hwang, J., & Zo, H. (2016): Understanding users’ continuance intention toward smartphone augmented reality applications. Information Development, 32(2), 161-174.
Lin, T., Been-Lirn, H., Li, N., Wang, H., y Tsa, Ch. (2013). An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011
Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self-directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204–218. doi:10.1111/bjet.12138.
Lu, J., & Ying-Chieh, L. (2014). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research,21(4), 525-541. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
Lu, S. y Liu, Y-Ch. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21, No. 4, 525–541, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
Marín, V., Cabero, J., & Barroso, J. (2014). Evaluando los entornos formativos online. El caso de DIPRO 2.0. REDU. Revista de docencia universitaria, 12(2), 375-399
.
Mateo, J. (2004). La investigación ex-post-facto. En R. Bisquerra (coord.), Metodología de la investigación educativa (pp. 195-230). Madrid: La Muralla.
Mehmet, H. (2016). The classification of augmented reality books: a literature review. Proceedings of INTED2016 Conference, (pp. 4110-4118).Valencia: INTED.
Morales, M., Benítez, C., Silva, D., Altamirano, M., & Mendoza, H. M. (2016). Aplicación móvil para el aprendizaje del inglés utilizando realidad aumentada. Revista Iberoamericana de Producción Académica y Gestión Educativa, Recuperado de http://www.pag.org.mx/index.php/PAG/article/viewFile/513/552
O´Dwyer, L. y Bernauer, J. (2014). Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. California: Sage.
Prendes, C. (2015). Realidad aumentada y educación: análisis de experiencias prácticas. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 46, 187-203.doi:10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i46.12.
Proske, A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: effects on motivation and achievement. Education Technology Research Development, 62, 481-505. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2.
Sabariego, M. (2012). El proceso de investigación (parte 2). En Bisquerra, R. (coord.), Metodología de la investigación educativa (pp. 127-163). (3ª. ed.). Madrid: La Muralla.
Santos, M. Wolde, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Rodrigo, M., Sandor, Ch., & Kato, H. (2016). Augmented reality as multimedia: the case for situated vocabulary learning. Research and Practice in Techology Enhanced Learning, 11(4), 1-23.
Sevillano, M.L., & Vázquez, E. (2015). Modelos de investigación en contextos ubicuos y móviles en educación superior. Madrid: McGraw-Hill/Uned.
Tecnológico de Monterrey (2015). Reporte EduTrends. Radar de Innovación Educativa 2015. Monterrey: Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Wei, X., Weng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). Teaching based on augmented reality for a technical creative design course. Computers & Education, 81, 221-234. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.017.
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014.
Wu, H-S., Lee, S., Chang, H-Y., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.