The modern breakdown of psychotherapy. Yields of Heideggerian ontology for a new foundation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v33i121.1042Keywords:
Psicoterapia, modernidad, subjetividad, cuidado, heideggerAbstract
Psychotherapy, as a modern outcome, sees itself as a set of empirically valid techniques aimed at alleviating a symptom or suffering. This foundation is based on the technical-theoretical availability of the world, as well as of the subject and his disarrangements, but does not take over of the paradox of equivalence, where different theoretical models obtain similar efficacy results. The foundation of therapy under the tradition of self-care, through the yields of Martin Heidegger's existential ontology, can offer a way out of the paradox of equivalence where the main character of change is not the theoretical presupposition from which it starts, but the movement of a subjectivity immersed in the world that, in a mediated way and under a theoretical pattern, allows the appearance of dimensions of meaning not previously attended to.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Psicoterapia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. This license allows third parties to cite the text and use it without alteration and for non-commercial purposes, provided they credit the authorship of the work and its first publication in this journal.
-
Authors may enter into other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
The views expressed in the articles are solely the responsibility of the authors and in no case do they reflect the opinions or scientific policies of the journal.


