Limits and possibilities of the practice of ethnographic film from Visual Anthropology

Authors

  • Sergio Úbeda Álvarez Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rdh.28.2016.16504

Keywords:

Audiovisual Anthropology, Ethnographic film, Modes of representation, Science, Art, Narration

Abstract

The following article is a review of the history of visual anthropology from the practice of their most demanded tool: the cinema. Cinema and anthropology are projects being developed in the twentieth century, from modernism to postmodernism, some times converging and distancing in many others. The epistemological possibilities that visual media and films has allowed in the past and may have in the future for anthropology are rewiewed in this article.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergio Úbeda Álvarez, Universidad de Granada

Doctor por la Universidad de Granada.

References

Ardèvol, Elisenda (1994). La mirada antropológica o la antropología de la mirada. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. Disponible en: http://goo.gl/l6KWo7 [Consultada: 6 Octubre 2015]

Durington, Mathew y Ruby, Jay (2011). Ethnographic film. En: Marcus Banks y Jay Ruby, Made to be seen. Perspectives on the history of visual anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 190-208.

Fabian, Johannes (1983). Time and the other. How anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press.

Grau Rebollo, Jordi (2002). Antropología audiovisual. Fundamentos teóricos y metodológicos en la inserción del audiovisual en diseños de investigación social. Barcelona: Bellaterra.

Grimshaw, Anna (2001). The Ethnographer´s Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heider, Karl G. (2006). Ethnographic film. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. [Primera edición (1976) Ethnographic film. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press]

Hockings, Paul (ed.) (2003). Principles of visual anthropology. Berlin and New York. Mouton de Gruyter. [Primera edición (1975) Principles of visual anthropology. Berlin and New York. Mouton de Gruyter]

Jay, Martin (1993). Forcé Fields. Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique. New York: Routledge.Traducción al español en Paidós (2003)

Mitchell , W. J. T. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Pink, Sarah (2006). The future of visual anthropology. Engaging the senses. New York: Routledge.

Ruby, Jay (2000). Picturing culture. Explorations of film and anthropology. Chicago and Lonndon: University of Chicago Press.

Taylor, Lucien (1998). Visual Anthropology Is Dead, Long Live Visual Anthropology! American Anthropologist, 100 (2), p. 534-537.

Worth, Sol y Adair, John (1973). Through Navajo Eyes. An exploration in film communication and ethnography. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Worth, Sol (Ed.) (1981) Studying Visual Comunication. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.

Worth, Sol (1995). Hacia una semiótica del cine etnográfico. En Elisenda Ardévol y Luis Pérez Tolón (Eds.), Imagen y cultura. Perspectivas del cine etnográfico. Granada: Diputación Provincial de Granada, p. 203220.

Published

2016-05-01

How to Cite

Úbeda Álvarez, S. (2016). Limits and possibilities of the practice of ethnographic film from Visual Anthropology. Revista de Humanidades, (28), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdh.28.2016.16504

Issue

Section

Artículos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.