Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy (Judgment of 23 February 2012). Rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.32.2013.11789Keywords:
European Court of Human Rights, case Hirsi Jamma, immigrants’ rights, asylum right, collective expulsions,Abstract
The professor Carrillo Salcedo meditates on the duty of protection of the States that derives of the human rights guaranteed by the juridical international classification and its protection in so diverse environments as the right to the attendance doctor pharmacist of the irregular immigrants and the protection in front of the extradition of the accused of diffusing State's secrets.Downloads
Downloads
Published
2013-07-01
How to Cite
Carrillo Salcedo, J. A. (2013). Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy (Judgment of 23 February 2012). Rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain. Teoría Y Realidad Constitucional, (32), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.32.2013.11789
Issue
Section
Notas
License
Las obras están bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
