Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy (Judgment of 23 February 2012). Rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain

Authors

  • Juan Antonio Carrillo Salcedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.32.2013.11789

Keywords:

European Court of Human Rights, case Hirsi Jamma, immigrants’ rights, asylum right, collective expulsions,

Abstract

The professor Carrillo Salcedo meditates on the duty of protection of the States that derives of the human rights guaranteed by the juridical international classification and its protection in so diverse environments as the right to the attendance doctor pharmacist of the irregular immigrants and the protection in front of the extradition of the accused of diffusing State's secrets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-07-01

How to Cite

Carrillo Salcedo, J. A. (2013). Reflections of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case Hirsi Jamaa and others v Italy (Judgment of 23 February 2012). Rights of migrants in an irregular situation in Spain. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, (32), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.32.2013.11789