Assessment of bullying victimization: Structure, reliability and validity of the Cuestionario de Acoso entre Iguales (CAI; Peer Bullying Questionnaire)

Authors

  • Ana M. Magaz Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
  • Paloma Chorot Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, España
  • Miguel A. Santed Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, España
  • Rosa M. Valiente Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, España
  • Bonifacio Sandín Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.21.num.2.2016.16990

Keywords:

CAI, bullying, victimization, cyberbullying, assessment, children, adolescents.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to provide preliminary evidence concerning validation of the Cuestionario de Acoso entre Iguales (CAI) [Peer Bullying Questionnaire] (Magaz, Chorot, Sandín, Santed, & Valiente, 2011). We examined the factor structure, reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Conductas de Acoso (CAI-CA) scale [Bullying Behaviors] in a sample of school-aged children and adolescents. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a structure of seven uncorrelated factors which correspond to the following kinds of bullying: physical aggression, verbal aggression, direct social exclusion, indirect social exclusion, threats, cyberbullying, and aggression based on physical objects. Results provide support for factorial validity, internal consistency, and convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. Data suggest that the CAI-CA is an appropriate assessment instrument of bullying victimization that may be a suitable tool for research and clinical purposes.

Downloads

How to Cite

Magaz, A. M., Chorot, P., Santed, M. A., Valiente, R. M., & Sandín, B. (2016). Assessment of bullying victimization: Structure, reliability and validity of the Cuestionario de Acoso entre Iguales (CAI; Peer Bullying Questionnaire). Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology   , 21(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.21.num.2.2016.16990

Issue

Section

Original research articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>