Due resolution, unfair resolution and non-existent resolution

Authors

  • Araceli Manjón-Cabeza Olmeda Universidad Complutense de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.JULIO.2024.40172

Keywords:

prevarication, malicious judicial delay, refusal to judge, due resolution, effective judicial protection, duty to exercise jurisdiction

Abstract

The article analyses three types of prevarication regarding to the issued or not issued resolution to compare them with the due decision that satisfies the right to effective judicial protection. In first case, the due resolution is replaced by another described as «unfair»; in the second case, the decision is avoided and it causes a delay; in the last case, the adoption of the decision is avoided without justification. Special consideration is given to resolutions that should be considered noncriminal. The work also studies whether more specific objects of criminal protection can be identified within the common legal interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Manjón-Cabeza Olmeda, A. (2024). Due resolution, unfair resolution and non-existent resolution. Revista de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 32(JULIO). https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.JULIO.2024.40172

Issue

Section

Derecho Penal

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.