Igniting student engagement: H5P's transformative potential in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.2.43542Keywords:
H5P, engagement, distance study, creation of teaching aids, educational technologyAbstract
Student engagement is a key factor for success in online education, and there is a persistent need to identify and implement effective strategies to foster it, particularly in the increasingly common hybrid learning environments. Addressing this need, the present study evaluated the impact of interactive activities, designed using the H5P tool, on the engagement levels of 87 undergraduate students from two Ecuadorian universities. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was employed to compare control and experimental groups. Data were collected through a 12-item questionnaire assessing cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of engagement, supplemented by open-ended questions to gather qualitative data. The H5P intervention significantly improved cognitive aspects, such as concept understanding, knowledge application, and perceived depth of learning, as well as enjoyment; however, it did not significantly affect content relevance or collaboration. These findings suggest that while H5P can be a valuable tool for fostering specific components of student engagement, particularly cognitive and affective engagement, its effectiveness is limited when considered in isolation. Therefore, to maximize its impact, it is crucial to complement H5P with additional pedagogical strategies that actively promote collaboration, critical thinking, and connect the learning material with students' existing interests, experiences, and real-world applications. H5P offers considerable potential in online education, but requires a pedagogically informed, context-sensitive, and holistic approach. Future research is strongly recommended, employing rigorous experimental designs, larger and more diverse sample sizes, and multidimensional measurements of engagement, to provide deeper insights into optimizing the use of technology to effectively and sustainably foster all dimensions of student engagement, leading to improved learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Abdool, P. S., Nirula, L., Bonato, S., Rajji, T. K., & Silver, I. L. (2017). Simulation in undergraduate psychiatry: Exploring the depth of learner engagement. Academic Psychiatry, 41(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0633-9
Ali, I., Narayan, A. K., & Sharma, U. (2020). Adapting to COVID-19 disruptions: Student engagement in online learning of accounting. Accounting Research Journal, 34(3), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-09-2020-0293
Amhag, L. (2020). Student reflections and self-assessments in vocational training supported by a mobile learning hub. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020010101
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563-2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
Bajaber, S. S. A. (2024). Factors influencing students willingness to continue online learning as a lifelong learning: A path analysis based on MOA theoretical framework. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100377
Bakker, A. B., Sanz Vergel, A. I., & Kuntze, J. (2015). Student engagement and performance: A weekly diary study on the role of openness. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9422-5
Baleni, Z. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 281-291.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), Artículo 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Artículo 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Brookfield, S. D. (2009). Self-directed learning. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work: Bridging academic and vocational learning (pp. 2615-2627). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_172
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237-257). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11
Downes, S. (2022). Connectivism. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 114-138.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Gellisch, M., Morosan-Puopolo, G., Wolf, O. T., Moser, D. A., Zaehres, H., & Brand-Saberi, B. (2023). Interactive teaching enhances students' physiological arousal during online learning. Annals of Anatomy, 247, 152050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152050
Jacob, T., & Centofanti, S. (2024). Effectiveness of H5P in improving student learning outcomes in an online tertiary education setting. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36, 469-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09361-6
Kang, H., & Furtak, E. M. (2021). Learning theory, classroom assessment, and equity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 40(3), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12423
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
Lamtara, S. (2023). Faculty's pedagogical knowledge for technology-enhanced learning in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v4i2.412
Martin, F., & Borup, J. (2022). Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2089147
Martin, K., Goldwasser, M., & Galentino, R. (2017). Impact of cohort bonds on student satisfaction and engagement. Current Issues in Education, 19(3). https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1550
Mazman Akar, S. G. (2024). Why do students disengage from online courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 62, 100948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100948
Méndez Mantuano, M. O., Egüez Caviedes, E. C., Ochoa Ladines, K. V., Plúas Rogel, D. R., & Paredes Yuqui, C. E. (2021). Análisis del conductismo, cognitivismo, constructivismo y su interrelación con el conectivismo en la educación postpandemia. South Florida Journal of Development, 2(5), 6850-6863. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv2n5-038
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), Artículo e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
Mulrooney, H. M., & Kelly, A. F. (2020). Covid 19 and the move to online teaching: Impact on perceptions of belonging in staff and students in a UK widening participation university. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.2.15
Murillo Sevillano, L. N. de J., Vintimilla Burgos, N. P., & Murillo Sevillano, I. M. (2023). La educación virtual e híbrida. Consideraciones desde la Universidad de Guayaquil. Conrado, 19(90), 429-438. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442023000100429&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en
Ortiz, J. A. T., & Corrêa, T. H. B. (2020). Pedagogical aspects of connectivism and its relationship with social networks and learning ecologies. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 25, Artículo e250026. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782020250026
Parson, L., & Major, C. (2020). Learning theory through a social justice lens. In C. H. Major & L. S. Parson (Eds.), Teaching and learning for social justice and equity in higher education (pp. 7-38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44939-1_2
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
Ploetzner, R. (2024). The effectiveness of enhanced interaction features in educational videos: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 1597-1612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2123002
Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: Getting to transformation. Hippasus. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2013/04/16/SAMRGettingToTransformation.pdf
Rahmi, U., Fajri, B. R., & Azrul, A. (2024). Effectiveness of interactive content with H5P for Moodle-Learning Management System in blended learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.1135
Redmond, P., Abawi, L.-A., Brown, A., Henderson, R., & Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Rossetti-López, S. R., Coronado-García, M. A., & Rojas-Rodríguez, I. S. (2023). Percepción de los estudiantes sobre el uso de actividades interactivas con H5P. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 14(40), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2023.40.1545
Safarifard, R., Lavasani, M. G., Hejazi, E., & Thani, F. N. (2024). Pedagogical aspect of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 16(3), 521-546. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.024
Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446
Sharmin, N., Pandya, J., Stevenson, T. R., & Chow, A. K. (2024). Interactive H5P content for increased student engagement in a dental hygiene program. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene, 58(2), 88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11223635/
Sinnayah, P., Salcedo, A., & Rekhari, S. (2021). Reimagining physiology education with interactive content developed in H5P. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00021.2020
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Taylor, F., Welton, R., & Ellicott, D. (2018). The role of technology in enhancing engagement and building communities of practice within tourism education. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI2018 proceedings: 11th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain (pp. 934-938). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.0122
Theelen, H., & van Breukelen, D. H. J. (2022). The didactic and pedagogical design of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1286-1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12705
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fridel Julio Ramos-Azcuy, María Rodríguez-Gámez, Jeovanny Moisés Benavides-Bailón, María Margoth Bonilla-Jiménez, Ángel Enrique Arroba-Cárdenas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
