The MOOC in Continuous and Specialized Training: New Narratives and Audiovisual Formats? Myths and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.30023Keywords:
technologic education, new technologies, continuous training, computer aided learning, didactic use of the computerAbstract
Educational audio-visual formats have their own uniqueness in relation to their structures and narratives, which is another turn of the screw, a specialization of them in relation to the digital context. In this sense, the audiovisual, the video itself, are central pieces of the so-called MOOC, learning and training formats born at the dawn of digital space itself. This study aims to address these issues from the theoretical foundation of contemporary education and communication and its proposals of transliteracy, as we understand that this area of knowledge is ideal, since the basis of its theoretical construct was formulated on the relationship between media and education. In addition, we will review the literature on the emergence of the MOOC, with the aim of highlighting that the nature of the MOOC and the postMOOC era, as its specificity for continuous and specialized education, as well as the audiovisual media that compose them, must build their own methodologies and narratives. For this purpose, we will apply analysis templates of these audiovisual pieces that will lead us to assess to what extent these methodological premises are a reality or still maintain traditional patterns, with the ultimate intention of being proactive in future lines of action.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/30023/24343
Downloads
References
Andretta, S. (2009). Transliteracy: take a walk on the wild side. Proceeding World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Council, 23-27. Milán, Italia. https://bit.ly/3sDQiG8
Aparici, R. (2016). Educomunicación y voces de la educación mediática. Una propuesta de Roberto Aparici. Entrevista a Daniel Prieto Castillo, educador, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza (Argentina). Iván Rodríguez Cuevas (realizador-redactor CEMAV, UNED). https://canal.uned.es/video/5a6f2399b1111f023f8b456a
Barbas Coslado, A. (2012). Educomunicación: desarrollo, enfoques y desafíos en un mundo interconectado. Foro de Educación, 14, 157-175.
Baysal, S. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19). 218-229. http://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218
Clark, D. (2013). MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC. Blogger. http://bit.ly/3nZZOQl
Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia, RED, 39. https://www.um.es/ead/red/39/conole.pdf
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., y Sein-Echaluce, M. L. (2017). Los MOOC: un análisis desde una perspectiva de la innovación institucional universitaria. La Custión Universitaria, 9, 117-135.
Gil-Quintana, J., y Osuna-Acedo, S. (2020). Transmedia Practices and Collaborative Strategies in Informal Learning of Adolescents. Social Sciences, 9(6), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9060092
Ipri, T. (2010). Introducing transliteracy. What does it mean to academic libraries? November College & Research Libraries News, 71(10), 532-567 https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.71.10.8455
Kaplún, M. (1998). Una pedagogía de la comunicación. Ediciones de la Torre.
King, M., Pegrum, M., y Forsey, M. (2018). MOOCs and OER in the Global South: problems and potential. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742
Levy, P. (2004). Inteligencia colectiva. Por una antropología del ciberespacio. Washington: Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
Makazaga, I. (2020). La radio, aliada contra la pandemia en África. Planeta Futuro. El País http://bit.ly/3npz4cm
OECD (2018). G20 Leaders’ declaration. Building consensus for fair and sustainable development. Education Policy Outlook 2018. http://bit.ly/2XSaFBp
Osuna-Acedo, S., Marta-Lazo, C., y Frau-Meigs, D. (2018). De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO. Comunicar, 55, 105-114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10
Osuna-Acedo, S. (2014). Escenarios virtuales educomunicativos. Icaria Editorial.
Pérez Tornero, J. M. (2007). La estrategia internacional de la educación en medios. Comunicar, 28, 129-132.
Prieto Castillo, D. (2004). Presencia de la comunicación educativa. En R. Aparici (ed.) Comunicación educativa en la sociedad de la información. UNED.
Rajas, M., Puebla-Martínez, B., y Baños, M. (2018). Formatos audiovisuales emergentes para MOOCS: diseño informativo, educativo y publicitario. El profesional de la información, 27(2), 1699-2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.09
Rheingold, H. (2004). Multitudes inteligentes. La próxima revolución social. Gedisa.
Ruiz Bolívar, C. (2015). El MOOC: ¿un modelo alternativo para la educación universitaria? Revista Apertura, 7(2). 1-14.
Scolari, C. (2008). Hipermediaciones. Elementos para una teoría de la comunicación digital interactiva. Gedisa.
Suárez, C. (2010). La formación en red como objeto de estudio. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 7(2).
Sukovic, S. (2016). Transliteracy in Complex Information Environments. Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100875-1.00004-2
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. Bantam Books
Torres Mancera, D., y Gago Saldaña, D. (2014). Los MOOCs y su papel en la creación de comunidades de aprendizaje y participación. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 17(1), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.17.1.11570
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: technology and social interest. The Journal of individual psychology, 71(2). 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
UNESCO (2011). Alfabetización mediática e informacional: curriculum para profesores. https://bit.ly/2K8HcQf
Wilkinson, L. (2011). Transliteracy or Metaliteracy? Libraries and Transliteracy. https://librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/transliteracy-or-metaliteracy/
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza M., y Jakobs, H. (2014). MOOCs - A Review of the State-of-the-Art. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2014 conference, 3, 9-20.
Zapata-Ros, M. (2015). El diseño instruccional de los MOOC y el de los nuevos cursos abiertos personalizados. RED-Revista de Educación a Distancia. 45(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/45/zapata
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
