Student Perspectives of Technology use for Learning in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22102Keywords:
Web 2.0, Social Media Technologies, Technology Use for Learning, Learning Technologies, Technology Effectiveness, Personal Learning Environments PLEsAbstract
In this study, college students in a large public university in the U.S. were surveyed regarding what technologies they use most frequently for learning, what technologies they value for learning, and how they perceive technology effectiveness to support their learning. The results revealed that technology use and value were closely aligned with laptops and these were detailed as the most used and valued for learning, which underscores the importance of mobile and portable devices in supporting anytime anywhere learning. In terms of using software for learning, search engines, file-sharing tools, digital libraries, videos, and wikis obtained the best results, suggesting that students are adopting self-directed, approaches to their learning. Additionally, collaboration tools were perceived as the most important for learning which highlights the need to design better teaching strategies and learning interactions to support collaborative practices that use technology. Overall, the majority of participants perceived that technology was effective in fostering discussion, collaboration, and interaction. This enable experiential learning, supporting organization, planning, and resource management, and facilitating a personalized learning experience. The results also revealed statistically significant differences between the experiences of undergraduate and graduate students about the effectiveness of technology. Implications for integrating Web 2.0 technologies into teaching and learning practices are discussed.
Downloads
References
Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall Giesinger, C., and Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Adell, S.J. & Castañeda, L. (2010) The Personal Learning Environments (PLEs): a new way of understanding learning. In Roig Vila, R. & Fiorucci, M. (Eds.) Keys for innovation research and educational quality. The integration of information and communications technology and Interculturalism in the classroom. Stumenti di Ricerca per l'innovaziones and the qualità in education. The dell'informazione Tecnologie e della Comunicaziones e l'nella interculturalità scuola.Alcoy: Ivory - Roma TRE Universita degli Studi.
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. doi:10.1159/000094368
Castaneda, L., & Soto, J. (2010). Building Personal Learning Environments by using and mixing ICT tools in a professional way. Digital Education Review, 18, 9-25.
Dabbagh, N., et al. (2016). Learning technologies and globalization: Pedagogical frameworks and applications. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
Dabbagh, N., & Fake, H. (2017). College students’ perceptions of Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) through the lens of digital tools, processes, and spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 28-36. Available from https://naerjournal.ua.es/article/view/v6n1-4
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). The role of social media in self-regulated learning. International Journal of Web Based Communities (IJWBC), Special Issue, Social Networking and Education as a Catalyst Social Change, 9(2), 256-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijwbc.2013.053248
Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Impact of Web 2.0 on higher education. In D. W. Surry, T. Stefurak, & R. Gray (Eds.), Technology integration in higher education: Social and organizational aspects (pp. 174–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-147-8.ch013
Davis, M. (2008). Semantic wave 2008 report:Industry roadmap to Web 3.0 & multibillion dollar market opportunities. Executive Summary. Washington, DC: Project 10X.
Dede, C., & Crimson, E. (2013) New Technology-Based Models for Postsecondary Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Research Agendas, Report of a National Science Foundation-Sponsored Computing Research Association Workshop, 9–11 January. Retrieved from http://archive2.cra.org/uploads/documents/resources/rissues/Postseconday_Learning_NSF-CRA_report.pdf
Haskins, T. (2007). PLEs are power tools. Retrieved on 13th July, 2016 from http://growchangelearn.blogspot.com/2007/06/ples-are-power-tools.html
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Haywood, K. (2011). The NMC horizon report: 2011 K-12 edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2011- Horizon-Report-K12.pdf
Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with Integrative Learning Technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2012.00837.x
Lella, A., & Lipson, A. (2017). The 2017 U.S. Mobile App Report [white paper]. Retrieved from https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Presentations-and-Whitepapers/2017/The-2017-US-Mobile-App-Report?cs_edgescape_cc=US
Martindale, T. & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 177 - 193). Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.
Mason, R. & Rennie, F. (2007). Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 196–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.06.003
McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M.J.W. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1100
Minocha, S., & Kerawalla, L. (2011). University students' self-motivated blogging and development of study skills and research skills. In M. J. W. Lee, & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 149–179). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/9781605662947.ch008
Pardo, A. (2013) ‘Social learning graphs: combining social network graphs and analytics to represent learning experiences’, International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp.43–58, DOI: 10.1504/IJSMILE.2013.051652
Parra, B. (2016). Learning strategies and styles as a basis for building personal learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(4). DOI: 10.1186/s41239-016-0008-z
Rubin, N. (2010). Creating a user-centric learning environment with Campus Pack personal learning spaces. PLS Webinar, Learning Objects Community. Available from http://community.learningobjects.com/Users/Nancy.Rubin/Creating_a_User-Centric_Learning
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update, Washington, D.C., 2017.
van Harmelen, M. (2008). Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments 16(1), 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820701772686
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles that are published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The authors grant the exploitation rights of the work accepted for publication to RIED, guarantee to the journal the right to be the first publication of research understaken and permit the journal to distribute the work published under the license indicated in point 2.
2. The articles are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate electronically the OnlineFirst version (assessed version and accepted for publication) of its articles before publication, always with reference to its publication by RIED, favoring its circulation and dissemination earlier and with this a possible increase in its citation and reach among the academic community.
