The interpretive process in psychoanalytic therapy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.927Keywords:
psychoanalysis, interpretation, hypothesisAbstract
Interpretation is crucial in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. Notwithstanding this fact, the active construction of hypotheses, and their subsequent utilization in therapy, is rarely explicitly dealt with. The present article adresses the question of what should be the optimum distance between the patient and the theoretical speculations of the psychoanalist, arguing for the use of theory as a bridge that should serve as a meeting place between therapist and patient, and not as a point of contention that gives rise to resistance.
Downloads
References
Anzieu, D. (1972). Dificultad de un estudio psicoanalítico sobre la interpretación. Revista de Psicoanálisis, XXIX, 2, 253-282.
Auerhahn, N. (1979). Interpretation in Psychoanalytic Narrative: Á Literary Framework for the Analytical Process. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 6, 423-436.
Bion, W.R. (1974), Atención e interpretación. Barcelona: Paidós.
Coderch, J. (1987), Teoría y técnica de la psicoterapia psicoanalítica. Barcelona: Herder.
Etchegoyen, H. (1986). Los fundamentos de la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Frank, J. (1990). Elementos terapéuticos compartidos por todas las psicologías. En M. J, Mahoney (ed.), Cognición y psicoterapia. Barcelona: Paidós.
Goldberg, A. (1988). Une vue partagée du monde. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, LII, 5, 1069-1076.
Levy, L. (1971). La interpretación psicológica. México: F.C.E.
Lomas, P. (1987). The Limits of Interpretation. Norhvale: Jason Aronson Inc.
Racker, H. (1979). Estudios sobre técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Sharpe, R.A. (1987). Psychoanalysis and Narrative: A Structuralist Approach. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 14, 335-342.
Strachey, J. (1934). The Nature of the Therapeutic Action of Psycho-Analysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, IS, 127-159.
