Demonstrating a priori: Mathematics and Realism in Johannes Kepler’s Mysterium Cosmographicum

Authors

  • Francisco Javier Luna Leal Universitat de Barcelona.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.40.2017.17160

Keywords:

ohannes Kepler, demostración a priori, sólidos platónicos, astronomía pitagórica

Abstract


In his book Mysterium Cosmographicum, Johannes Kepler proposed two
closely related issues: first, that there is a pattern of organizing space that accounts for the ratio of planetary distances; secondly, that these distances, measured from the physical body of the sun, are related to the periods of each planet. In light of this, Kepler thought he could prove a priori the correct order of the heavens, including their number and distances, and consequently prove Copernicus’ hypothesis. this article aims to understand the importance that Kepler gave to the a priori proof, and its role within his astronomical research program.


Downloads

Author Biography

Francisco Javier Luna Leal, Universitat de Barcelona.

Investigador posdoctoral.

Departamento de Filosofía.

697242284

References

COPERNICO, Nicolás, (2015). De revolutionibus orbium coelestium/ Des révolutions des orbes célestes, traductores: Michel-Pierre Lerner, Alain Philippe Segonds y Jean-Pierre Verdet, 3 vol., París: Les Belles Lettres.

— (1989) Sobre las revoluciones de los orbes celestes, editor: Carlos Mingues, Madrid: Tecnos.

BLAIR, Ann, (1990). “Tycho Brahe's critique of Copernicus and the Copernican system”, Journal of the History of Ideas 51(3), pp. 355-377.

FIELD, J. V., (1998) Kepler's geometrical cosmology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

GINGERICH, Owen, (1993) The eye of heaven: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, New York: American Institute of Physics.

GOLDSTEIN, Bernard y Hon, G., (2005). “Kepler’s Move from Orbs to Orbits: Documenting a Revolutionary Scientific Concept”, Perspectives on Science, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 74-111.

GRAFTON, Anthony, (1973). “Maestlin on Copernicus” en Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 117, 6, pp. 523-550.

GRASSHOFF, Gerd, (2012). “Michael Maestlin's Mystery: Theory Building with Diagrams”, Journal for the History of Astronomy, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 57-74.

GRANADA, Miguel Ángel, (2010). “"A quo moventur planetae?" Kepler et la question de l’agent du mouvement planétaire après la disparition des orbes solides”, Galilaeana. Journal of Galilean Studies, 7, pp. 111-141.

JARDINE, Nicholas, Alain-Philippe (eds.), (1984). The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science. Kepler's 'A Defence of Tycho against Ursus' with Essays on its Provenance and Significance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KEPLER, Johannes, (1930-2009). Gesammelte Werke, editor: Max Caspar et al., 20 vol., Munich: C. H. Beck.

— (1992) El secreto del universo, trad. Eloy Rada García, Madrid: Alianza.

METHUEN, Charlotte, (1998). Kepler's Tübingen. Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics, Aldershot: Ashgate.

NOIROT, Caroline y Nuccio Ordine, (2012). Omnia in uno. Hommage à Alain-Philippe Segonds, París: Les Belles Lettres.

PLATÓN, (2006). Diálogos VI, traducción: Francisco Lisi, Madrid: Gredos.

PROCLO, (1970). A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid's Elements, traducción: Glenn R. Morrow, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

VOELKEL, R. James, (2001). The composition of Kepler's Astronomia Nova, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

WESTMAN, Robert S., (1975). “The Melanchthon Circle: Rheticus and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory”, Isis 66, pp. 165-193.

Published

2017-12-19

How to Cite

Luna Leal, F. J. (2017). Demonstrating a priori: Mathematics and Realism in Johannes Kepler’s Mysterium Cosmographicum. ENDOXA, (40), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.40.2017.17160

Issue

Section

Papers and Texts

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.