Intersubjetividad y estructura narrativa en la terapia familiar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i10.930Palabras clave:
terapia familiar, psicoterapia, modelo sistémicoResumen
Los terapeutas familiares tienden a aceptar el modelo sistémico como una realidad fundamental y incuestionable, olvidando que es sólo una metáfora útil para observar la interrelación de la familia. En el proceso, pasan de largo otra realidad, a saber, que los miembros de la familia también son individuos separables con sus propios centros de iniciativa y responsabilidad. Como resultado, los terapeutas familiares se centran en las relaciones pero tienden a desatender la experiencia personal. En este artículo, se intenta aportar una nueva contribución a la teoría de la terapia familiar, desde la perspectiva epistemológica y hermenéutica, sugiriendo dos proposiciones fundamentales: primero, que la familia humana es co-constituida como una comunidad inter subjetiva; y segundo, que las experiencias y acciones de los miembros de la familia son intrínsecamente estructuradas de una forma análoga a las estructuras narrativas.
Descargas
Citas
Auerswald, E.H. (1987). Epistemological confusion in family therapy and research. Family Process, 26, 317-330.
Auerswald, E.H. (1986). Family therapy as a movement: Epistemological barriers to ontological freedom. Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies, 5(4), 14-19.
Bednarz, J. (1984). Complexity and intersubjectivity: Towards the theory of Niklas Luhman. Human Studies, 7, 55-69.
Carr, D. (19864). Time, Narrative and History. Bloomington: Indiana Press.
Carr, D. (1986b). Narrative and the real world: An argument for continuity. History and Theory, 252), 117-131.
Carr, D. (1974). Intersubjectivity. In D. Carr, Phenomenology and the problem of History. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Dell, P. (1986). On the need for conversation in the family therapy field. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12, 25-29.
Dell, P. (1982b). In search of truth: On the way to a clinical epistemology. Family Process, 21, 407-414.
Gadamer, H.G, (1975). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
Goolishian, H. & Anderson, H. (1987). Language systems and therapy: An evolving idea. Journal of Psychotherapy, 24, 529-538.
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian meditations. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Keeney, B.P. & Sprenkle, D.H, (1982). Ecosystemic epistemology: critical implications for the aesthetics and pragmatics of family therapy. Family Process, 21(1), 1-19.
Kermode, F, (1981). Secrets and narrative sequence, In W.J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Madison, G.B. (1988). The hermeneutics of (inter)-subjectivity, or: The mind/body problem deconstructed, Man and World, 21, 3-33.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mink, L.O. (1987). Historical understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mook, B. (1987). Phenomenology and family therapy. In F.J. van Zuuren, F.J. Wertz & B. Mook (Eds.), Advances in qualitative psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Mook, B. (1985). Phenomenology, system theory and family therapy. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 16, 1-12.
Nichols, M.P. (1987), The self in the system. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Rayner, P. (1986). On asking the right question. Family Process (1), 123-132.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rojcewicz, R. (1988). Art does imitate nature: Á book review. Research in Phenomenology, 28, 300-307.
Schafer, R. (1978). Language and insight. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Schuttz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. New York: Northwestern University Press.
White, H. (1981). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In W, J.T. Mitchell (Ed.), On Narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
