La perspectiva sistémica de la violencia: una perspectiva ética

Autores/as

  • John S. Mc. Conaghy Universidad de Missouri-St.Louis
  • R.Rocco Cottone Universidad de Missouri-St.Louis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v14i54-55.681

Palabras clave:

construcción personal, teoría de sistemas, mundo exógeno, personal

Resumen

La teoría de sistemas ha sido criticada por numerosas escritoras feministas que sentían que ésta no se aproximaba adecuadamente a las cuestiones de la violencia y la dominancia masculina en las familias. Este escrito argumenta que la teoría de sistemas describe el mundo desde una perspectiva “exógena”-el mundo científico de la naturaleza, que es intrínsecamente amoral. En el mundo exógeno la causalidad es circular, tal como la naturaleza mantiene un sistema que ha sobrevivido billones de años. Bateson consideró que “la mente”se encontraba dentro del sistema de la naturaleza, implicando con ello que la mente también debe ser amoral. Sin embargo,, la mayoría de las personas ven el mundo desde una perspectiva “endógena”, una construcción personal de la realidad moldeada por el entorno en el que viven, y que inevitablemente incorpora lo moral. Los humanos creen que la violencia está mal, pero no por razones intelectuales, sino por razones morales. Se presentan aquí las implicaciones para la terapia. Se adopta una posición posmoderna o constructivista como una manera de conocer la influencia que tienen las relaciones sobre los problemas y sobre la definición de los problemas, mientras que se permite que se extienda un consenso moral o social en la iniciativa terapéutica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Avis, J.M. (1992). Where are all the family therapists? Abuse and violence within families and family therapy’s response. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 18:225-232.

Barash, D. (1979). The whisperings within. New York: Harper & Row.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E.P.Dutton.

Becvar, D.S., & Becvar, R.J. (1988). Family therapy: A systemic intergration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Bograd, M. (1984). Family systems approaches to wife battering: A feminist critique. American Journal of Orthopsyquiatry 54:558-568.

Bograd, M. (1986). A feminisit examination of family systems models of violence against women in the family (pp.34-50). In J.C. Hansen & M.Ault-Riche (eds), Women and family therapy. Rockville MD: Aspen Systems.

Bograd, M. (1992). Values in conflict: Challenges to family therapist‘s thinking. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 18:245-256.

Cottone, R.R (1988). The search for a scientific foundation for ethical theory in vocational rehabilitacion. Journal of Rehabilitation 54 (October/November/ December): 21-26.

Cottone, R.R (1992). Theories and paradigms of counseling and psychotherapy. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Cottone, R.R & Greewell, R.J. (1992). Beyond linearity and circularity. Deconstructing social systems theory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 18:167-177.

Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. River out of Eden. New York: Basic Books.

Darwin, C. (1964). The origin of species (Facsimile edition, E.Mayr, ed). Cambridge: harvard University Press. [Original work published 1959]

Dell, P.F. (1989). Violence and the systemic view: The problem of Power. Family Process 28:1-14.

Gergen, K.J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Gergen, K.J. ( (1984). Agression as discourse (pp.51-68). In A. Mummendey (ed), Social psychology of agression. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40:266-275.

Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of the self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review 47: 481-517.

Gilligan, C (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gilligan, C & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations (pp.73-86). In C.Gilligan, J.V. Ward, J.M. Taylor, & B.Bardige (eds), Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge harvard University Press.

Gloria, J. Da (1984). Fustration, aggression, and the sense of justice (pp. 127-141). In A. Mummendey (ed), Social psychology of agression. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Goldner, V. (1985). Warning: Family Therapy may be hazarous for your health. The Family Therapy Networker 9 (6): 19-23.

Goldner, V. (1991). Feminism and systemic practice: Two critical traditions in transition.Journal of Strategic and Systemic Therapies 10:118-126.

Gould, S.J. (1977). Ever since Darwin: Reflections in natural history. New York: W.W. Norton.

Hoffman, L. (1988). A constructivist position for family therapy. The Irish Journal of Psychology 9:110-129.

Hoffman, L. (1990). Constucting realities: An art of lenses. Family Process 29:1-12.

James, K. & Mcintyre, D. (1983). The reproduction of families: The social role of family therapy? Jounal of Marital and Family Therapy 9: 119-129.

Kaufman, G. (1992). The mysterious dissapearance of battered women in family therapist’s offices: male privilege colluding with male violence. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 18:233-244.

Keeney, B.P (1987). The construction of therapeutic realities.Psychotherapy 24: 469-476.

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive developmental approach to socialization (pp.347-480) In D.Goslin (ed), The handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago IL: Rand McNally.

Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice: Essays on moral development, 1.San Francisco CA: Harper & Row.

Kohlberg, L. (1984) The psychology of moral development: Essays on moral development, 1. San Francisco CA: Harper & Row.

Lyons, N.P. (1988). Two perspectives: On self relationships, and morality (pp.21-48). In C. Gilligan, JV.Ward, J.M.Taylor, & B.Bardige (eds).Mapping and the moral domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Maclonnon, L.K.& Miller, D. (1987). The new epistemology and the Milan approach: Feminist and sociopolitical considerations.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 13: 139-155.

MARGOLIN, G. (1982). Ethical and legal considerations in marital and family therapy. American Psychologist 37: 788-801.

Maturana, H.R. Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: D.Reidel. [Original work published in 1970]

Mcnamee, S & Gergen, K, J (1992). Therapy as social construction. London: Sage Publications.

Descargas

Publicado

2003-06-01

Cómo citar

Mc. Conaghy, J. S., & Cottone, R. (2003). La perspectiva sistémica de la violencia: una perspectiva ética. Revista de Psicoterapia, 14(54-55), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v14i54-55.681

Número

Sección

Artículo de monográfico