Bienestar y Fundamentos Morales: Una Revisión Metanalítica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.v35i129.38818Palabras clave:
Bienestar, fundamentos morales, panas, swls, via-is, sdtResumen
Pese a que la Teoría de los Fundamentos Morales (MFT) es posiblemente el modelo reciente más conocido sobre valores y moral humana y sobre el que más se ha investigado, su relación con el bienestar es un tópico que apenas se ha investigado. Este estudio revisa cuantitativamente toda la información publicada acerca de la relación entre fundamentos morales y el bienestar, tanto hedónico como eudaimónico. La revisión centrada en el bienestar hedónico se ha realizado mediante un enfoque meta-analítico, mientras que para el bienestar eudaimónico se ha asumido un enfoque descriptivo sencillo. Los resultados muestran una relación significativa entre los fundamentos morales y el bienestar en la mayor parte de las subescalas del bienestar incluidas, que depende en términos generales del tipo de fundamento moral considerado. Mientras que los fundamentos individuales (Cuidado/daño y Justicia/engaño) muestran una asociación significativa con las medidas de bienestar eudaimónico, los fundamentos grupales (Lealtad/traición, Autoridad/subversión y Pureza/degradación) muestran una asociación significativa tanto con las medidas de bienestar eudaimónico como con las de bienestar hedónico. No obstante, los resultados dependen en general del fundamento moral y de la subescala del bienestar consideradas. Se discuten por último las limitaciones encontradas, así como la posible aplicación de los resultados obtenidos a la investigación futura en una terapia que incluya los fundamentos morales para mejorar el bienestar de las personas.
Descargas
Citas
*Indica que el estudio ha sido incluido en la revisión
Alesso, M., Guardia, M. I., & Rueda, M. E. (1996). Consideraciones sobre la anagnórisis aristotélica. Circe, 1, 45-57. https://repo.unlpam.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/unlpam/7416/v1a04alesso_c.pdf
*Athota, V. S., Budhwar, P., & Malik, A. (2020). Influence of personality traits and moral values on employee well‐being, resilience and performance: A cross‐national study. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 653-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12198
*Bassett, J. F., Van Tongeren, D. R., Green, J. D., Sonntag, M. E., & Kilpatrick, H. (2015). The interactive effects of mortality salience and political orientation on moral judgments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12086
*Bespalov, A., Prudnikova, M., Nyamdorj, B., & Vlasov, M. (2017). Life aspirations, values and moral foundations in Mongolian youth. Journal of Moral Education, 46(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1347087
Borenstein, M.J., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Editorial Síntesis.
*Cardille, M. (2019). Modulação de julgamentos morais e da satisfação com a vida após treinamento de meditação na compaixão. [Modulación de juicios morales y satisfacción con la vida después del entrenamiento en meditación de compasión] [Tesis doctoral, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo]. https://dspace.mackenzie.br/bitstream/handle/10899/22758/Maur%c3%adcio%20Cardille.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Casellas‐Grau, A., Font, A., & Vives, J. (2014). Positive psychology interventions in breast cancer. A systematic review. Psycho‐Oncology, 23(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3353
*Choi, M., Karnaze, M. M., Lench, H. C., & Levine, L. J. (2022). Do liberals value emotion more than conservatives? Political partisanship and Lay beliefs about the functionality of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09997-4
Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
*Curlee, M. S., & Ahrens, A. H. (2022). An exploratory analysis of the Ignatian examen: Impact on self-transcendent positive emotions and eudaimonic motivation. The Journal of Positive Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2109197
*Curry, O. S., Jones Chesters, M., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ‘morality-as-cooperation’ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
*Diessner, R., Iyer, R., Smith, M. M., & Haidt, J. (2013). Who engages with moral beauty? Journal of Moral Education, 42(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.785941
*Ding, I., & Javed, J. (2021). The autocrat’s moral-legal dilemma: Popular morality and legal institutions in China. Comparative Political Studies, 54(6), 989-1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020957694
Djeriouat, H., & Trémolière, B. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.026
Epicuro (s.IV a.C./1999). Carta a Meneceo (Noticia, traducción y notas de P. Oyarzún). Onomázein, (4), 403-425.
Frankl, V.E. (1963). Man's search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy. Washington Square Press.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. En Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55-130). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., & Seeman, T. E. (2012). Contributing to others, contributing to oneself: Perceptions of generativity and health in later life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(6), 660-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs034
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon/Random House.
Heine, F., & Wolters, E. (2021). Using moral foundations in government communication to reduce vaccine hesitancy. PloS one, 16(11), e0259435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259435
Hendriks, T., Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Hassankhan, A., De Jong, J., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2020). The efficacy of multi-component positive psychology interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of happiness studies, 21, 357-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00082-1
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? Psychological methods, 11(2), 193-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape: Moral motives and group-based moralities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313480274
*Kang, L. L., Rowatt, W. C., & Fergus, T. A. (2016). Moral foundations and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A preliminary examination. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 11, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.06.004
*Kapoor, H., Tagat, A., Karandikar, S., & Ticku, A. (2020). How to Catch’Em All? An Investigation of Personality and Gameplay Styles in Pokémon GO. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality, 29, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00355
*Kerry, N., Loria, R. N., & Murray, D. R. (2019). Gluttons for punishment? Experimentally induced hunger unexpectedly reduces harshness of suggested punishments. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5(4), 352–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-019-00121-4
Kiser, S. (2013). Associations between moral foundations and healthy eating identity and self-efficacy [Tesis doctoral, Arizona State University]. https://keep.lib.asu.edu/_flysystem/fedora/c7/72560/tmp/package-hxtDzw/Kiser_asu_0010N_12594.pdf
Kristiansen, C. M. (1985). Value correlates of preventive health behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.748
Längle, A. (2005). The Search for Meaning in Life and the Existential Fundamental Motivations. Existential Analysis, 16(1), 2-14. https://www.laengle.info/userfile/doc/FM-Vancouver-7-02-corr-Brit-9-8-03---Psychoth-Melbourne.pdf
*Lench, H. C., Levine, L. J., Perez, K. A., Carpenter, Z. K., Carlson, S. J., & Tibbett, T. (2019). Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016. Emotion, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000411
*Miles A, Upenieks L, Orfanidis C (2022). Beyond prosociality: Recalling many types of moral behavior produces positive emotion. PLoS ONE 17(11): e0277488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277488
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
MoralFoundations (2021) Questionnaires. https://moralfoundations.org/questionnaires/
Noriega, C., Velasco, C., Pérez-Rojo, G., Carretero, I., Chulián, A., & López, J. (2017). Calidad de Vida, Bienestar Psicológico y Valores en Personas Mayores Quality of Life, Well-Being and Values in older people. Revista Clínica Contemporánea, 8(e1), 1-13. https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r161r/ w25684w/Calidad%20de%20Vida.pdf
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association. http://www.ldysinger.com/@books1/Peterson_Character_Strengths/character-strengths-and-virtues.pdf
*Rosebush, M. (2011). Validations of the Character Mosaic Report (Report No. ADA557599). Air Force Academy Colorado Springs Co. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA557599.pdf
*Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., van Der Pligt, J., van Elk, M., & Pyszczynski, T. (2016). A march to a better world? Religiosity and the existential function of belief in social-moral progress. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.990345
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Schwartz, S. H., & Sortheix, F. (2018). Values and Subjective Well-Being. En E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of Well-Being (pp. 1-25). Noba Scholar. http://www.nobascholar.com/chapters/51
Stenhoff, A., Steadman, L., Nevitt, S., Benson, L., & White, R. G. (2020). Acceptance and commitment therapy and subjective wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials in adults. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 18, 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.08.008
*Tullett, A. M., Hart, W. P., Feinberg, M., Fetterman, Z. J., & Gottlieb, S. (2016). Is ideology the enemy of inquiry? Examining the link between political orientation and lack of interest in novel data. Journal of Research in Personality, 63, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.018
*van Ginkel, S. E. (2020). Happy planet, happy people? The impact of pro-environmental behaviour on psychological well-being [Tesis doctoral, Carleton University]. https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/7221f41d-7688-40ac-8555-e7353699dd38/etd_pdf/ed2b20a0f0b64f104989960ec57b9659/ vanginkel-happyplanethappypeopletheimpactofproenvironmental.pdf
Vázquez, C., Hervás, G., Rahona, J. J., & Gómez, D. (2009). Psychological well-being and health. Contributions of positive psychology. Anuario de Psicologia Clinica y de la Salud/Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 15-27. https://idus.us.es/bitstream/handle/11441/132721/ APCS_5_eng_15-27.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
*Vecina, M. L. (2014). The Five Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale in men in court-mandated treatment for violently abusing their partners. Personality and individual differences, 64, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.021
*Verhaeghen, P., & Mirabito, G. (2021). When you are talking to yourself, is anybody listening? The relationship between inner speech, self-awareness, wellbeing, and multiple aspects of self-regulation. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 7, 8-24. https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.7.37354
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of statistical software, 36(3), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1867/jss.v036.i03
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678– 691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form. University of Iowa. https://doi.org/10.17077/48vt-m4t2
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Wilson, D. B. (2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
