¿Una psicoterapia sin fundamentos? La hermenéutica, el discurso y el fin de la certidumbre.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v10i37.773Palabras clave:
contingencia, narrativa, postfundacionalismo, investigación, terapiaResumen
En la última década, la actividad terapéutica ha empezado a cuestionarse los fundamentos de sus propias afirmaciones. Sin poder refugiarse en el empirismo lógico ni en el realismo ingenuo debido a su crítica intrínseca hacia estas posiciones filosóficas, ha intentado buscar una respuesta en las epistemologías hermenéutica y postfundacionalista. Mediante el análisis de los temas de debate de la investigación del proceso terapéutico, podremos trazar el desarrollo de las actuales tendencias lingüísticas. El fin de la era de la búsqueda de certidumbres en el ámbito de la terapia ha tenido ciertas consecuencias que, hasta la fecha, han sido ignoradas tanto por los clínicos como por los teóricos, cuya intención de huir de las restricciones del cientificismo resulta incompatible con un inquebrantable compromiso con las prácticas terapéuticas, que son esencialmente normativas.
Descargas
Citas
Miller, P. & Rose, N. (1994). On therapeutic authority: Psychoanalytic expertise under advanced liberalism. History of the Human Sciences, 7 (3), 29-64.
O’hanlon, B. (1994) The Third Wave. The Family Therapy Networker, Nov-Dec., 18-26.
Orlinsky, D.E. & Howard, K.I. (1986). Process and outcome in psychotherapy. In S.L. Garfield & A.E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (3rd ed., pp. 311-381). New York: Wiley.
Orlinsky, D.E. & Russell, R.L. (1994). Tradition and change in psychotherapy research: Notes in the fourth generation. In R.L. Russell (Ed.), Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 185-214). New York: Guilford.
Parker, I., Georgaca, E., Harper, D., Mclaughlin, T. & Stowall-Smith, M. (1995). Deconstructing psychopathology. London: Sage.
Polkinghorne, D. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 146-165). London: Sage.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rorty, R. (1980). Pragmatism, relativism and irrationalism. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 53, 719-738.
Rorty, R. (1989). Foucault and epistemology. In D.C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: a critical reader (pp.41-50). Oxford: Blackwell.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
Roth, A. & Fonagy, P. (1995). Research on the efficacy and effectiveness of the psychotherapies. Draft of report to the United Kingdom Department of Health.
Russell, R.L. (1986). The inadvisability of admixing psychoanalysis with other forms of psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 16, 76-85.
Russell, R.L. (1987). Psychotherapeutic discourse: Future directions and the critical pluralist attitude. In R.L. Russell (Ed.), Language in psychotherapy: Strategies of discovery (pp. 341-351). New York: Guilford.
Russell, R.L. (Ed.) (1994a) Reassessing psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford.
Russell, R.L. (1994b) critically reading psychotherapy process research: a brief enactment. In R.L. Russell (Ed.) Reassessing psychotherapy research. (pp. 166-184) New York: Guilford.
Sass, L.A. (1992) The epic of disbelief: The postmodernist turn in contemporary psychoanalysis. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 167-182). London: Sage.
Schafer, R. (1980). Narrative actions in psychoanalysis. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Scholes, R. (1989). Protocols of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sechrest, L., Mcknight, P. & Mcknight, K. (1996). Calibration of measures for psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 51 (10), 1065-1071.
Seigman, M.E.P. (1996). Science as an ally of practice. American Psychologist, 51 (10), 1072-1079.
Shapiro, D.A., Harper, H., Startup, M., Reynolds, S., Bird, D., & Suokas, A. (1994). The high water mark of the drug metaphor: A meta-analytic critique of process-outcome research. In R.L. Russell (Ed.) Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 1-35). New York: Guilford.
Shotter, j.(1994). Is there a logic in common-sense? The scope and the limits of Jan Smedslund’s “geometric” psycho-logic. In J. Siegfried (Ed.), The status of common sense in psychology (pp. 149-168). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Siegfried, J. (Ed.) (1994) The status of common sense in psychology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Siegfried, J. (1995). Therapeutic and everyday discourse as behaviour change: Towards a micro- analysis in psychotherapy process research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Silverman, D. (1987). Communication and medical practice. London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (1989). The impossible dreams of reformism and romanticism. In J.F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), The politics of field research: Sociology beyond the Enlightenment. London: Sage.
Smail, D. (1996). Environmental cause and therapeutic cure: The impotence of insight. Psychotherapy Section Newsletter, British Psychological Society, 6-16.
Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-logic. New York: Springer.
Speed, B. (1991). Reality exists OK? An argument against constructivism and social constructionism. Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 395-409.
Spence, D. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Basic Books.
Stancombe, J. & White, S. (1997). Notes on the tenacity of therapeutic presuppositions in process research: Examining the artfulness of blamings in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19 (1), 21-41.
Stiles, W.B. & Shapiro, D.A. (1989). Abuse of the drug metaphor in psychotherapy process-outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 521-543.
Stiles, W.B., Shapiro, D.A. & Harper, H. (1994). Finding the ways from process to outcome: Blind alleys and unmarked trails. In R. L. Russell (Ed.) Reassessing psychotherapy research (pp. 36-64). New York: Guilford.
White, S. (1996). Regulating mental health and motherhood in contemporary welfare services: Anxious attachments or attachment anxiety? Critical Social Policy, 16 (1), 67-94.
