Strategic groups in private higher education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.26657

Keywords:

Strategic groups, Private sector, Higher Education, University classification

Agencies:

Catedra UNESCO-Banco Santander, Departamento de Educación, Política Lingüística y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco, Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to characterize the institutional diversity of the private side of a higher education system. The classification techniques used in the literature have a propensity to compare private higher education institutions with their public counterparts and run the risk of underestimating the impact of the market as a source of institutional differentiation. In this paper we propose an alternative classification that allows this limitation    to be overcome. We obtain a multidimensional classification of private higher education institutions and analyze the relationship between their institutional characteristics and the sources of differentiation. The study has been conducted in the Colombian higher education system, as it constitutes one of the systems with the highest rates of privatization worldwide. Our results identify five strategic groups of private higher education institutions. Distance learning, the offer of technical and technological programs, and postgraduate training are key factors determining the differences across Colombian private higher education institutions. The approach followed in this paper could be used to identify potential paths for the development and expansion of private higher education institutions, further contributing to the sustainability and competitiveness of higher education systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dorys Yaneth Rodríguez Castro, Universidad de Deusto

Doctoranda del Programa de Competitividad Empresarial y Territorial, Innovación y Sostenibilidad (CETIS) de la Deusto Business School, Universidad de Deusto en Donostia-San Sebastián (España). Su área de actuación es la gestión de la investigación y de la innovación en sistemas de políticas públicas, universidades y empresas. E-mail: djrc72@opendeusto.es

Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Universidad de Deusto

Profesor e investigador en el Departamento de Economía de la Deusto Business School, Universidad de Deusto en Donostia-San Sebastián. Sus principales intereses docentes y de investigación se centran en las políticas de ciencia, tecnología e innovación y la gestión de la innovación. E-mail: jmzabala@deusto.es

Juan Aparicio, Universidad de Deusto

Profesor Titular de Universidad en el Departamento de Estadística, Matemáticas  e  Informática  y  Director  del  Instituto  Universitario   de Investigación “Centro de Investigación Operativa” de la Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche. Su línea principal de investigación es la evaluación   de la eficiencia y la productividad desde un punto de vista metodológico y aplicado.  E-mail: j.aparicio@umh.es

References

Aldas, J., Escribá, A., Iborra, M., y Safón, V. (2016). La Universidad Española: Grupos estratégicos y desempeño. Fundación BBVA.

Álvarez, G. (2013). Tipologías de las instituciones de educación superior privadas ¿para qué? En J. Silas (Ed.), Estados de la educación superior en America Latina, el balance público- privado. ITESO.

Arimoto, A. (2014). The Teaching and Research Nexus in the Third Wave Age. In J., Shin, A. Arimoto, W. Cummings, & U. Teichler. (Eds.), Teaching and Research in Contemporary Higher Education (pp. 15–35).

Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Sánchez- Barrioluengo, M. (2016). One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 731–735, https://doi.org/10.1093/ scipol/scw018

Borg, I., Groenen, P., & Mair, P. (2012). Applied Multidimensional Scaling, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 81-322-0763-4

Brunner, J. (2009). Educación Superior en Chile: Instituciones, mercados y políticas gubernamentales, 1967-2007. [Tesis doctoral]. Leiden University.

Carpentier, V. (2018). Expansion and differentiation in higher education : the historical trajectories of the UK , the USA and France. Center for Global Higher Education.

Dan, M., Ritchie, W., & Geiger, S. (2009). Strategic Group Membership and Nonprofit Organization Performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 23–39.

DANE (2011). Clasificación Internacional Normalizada de la Educación adaptada para Colombia CINE 2011.

Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., Geuna, A., Lepori, B., Bach, L., Bogetoft, P., … Eeckaut, & P. Vanden. (2011). The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project. Research Policy, 40(1), 148–164

Darraz, E. y Bernasconi, A. (2012). Elementos conceptuales para el análisis organizacional de universidades en contextos de mercado. Innovar, 22(46), 87–97.

de La Torre, E., Casani, F., & Sagarra, M. (2018). Defining typologies of universities through a DEA- MDS analysis: An institutional characterization for formative evaluation purposes. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 388–403.

De Witte, K. & Hudrlikova, L. (2013). What about excellence in teaching? A benevolent ranking of universities. Scientometrics, 96, 337–364.

Duan, S. (2019). Measuring university efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis and strategic group analysis to Australian universities. Benchmarking, 26(4), 1161–1173.

Huisman, J., Lepori, B., Seeber, M., Frølich, N., & Scordato, L. (2015). Measuring institutional diversity across higher education systems. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 369–379.

Ketchen, D., Snow, C., & Hoover, V. (2004). Research on competitive dynamics: Recent accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 30(6), 779–804.

Kwiek, M. (2017). De-privatization in higher education: a conceptual approach. Higher Education, 74(2), 259–281.

Kwiek, M. (2018). Private Higher Education in Developed Countries. In Shin J. & P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017- 9553-1_92-1

Levy, D. (2009). Growth and Typology. In S. Bjarnason, K. Cheng, J. Fielden, M. Lemaitre, D. Levy, & N. Varghese (Eds.), A New Dynamic: Private Higher Education (pp. 7–27), UNESCO.

Levy, D. (2013). The decline of private higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26(1), 25–42.

Meilich, O. (2019). Strategic groups maps: review, synthesis, and guidelines. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(4), 447–463.

Navas, L. P., Montes, F., Abolghasem, S., Salas, R. J., Toloo, M., & Zarama, R. (In press). Colombian higher education institutions evaluation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

OECD. (2018). Education at a Glance 2018 : OECD Indicators. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/eag-2018-en

OECD (2016). La educación en Colombia: Revisión de políticas nacionales de eduación. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264250604-en

Raza, R. (2009). Examining Autonomy and Accountability in Public and Private Tertiary Institutions. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 1–36.

Rossi, F. (2009). Increased competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical analysis of the Italian University system. Higher Education Policy, 22(4), 389–413.

Sagarra, M., Mar-Molinero, C., & Rodríguez-Regordosa, H. (2015). Evaluating the success of educational policy in Mexican Higher Education. Higher Education, 69(3), 449–469.

Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014). Articulating the “three-missions” in Spanish universities. Research Policy, 43(10), 1760–1773.

Teixeira, P., Rocha, V., Biscaia, R., & Cardoso, M. (2012). Competition and diversity in higher education: An empirical approach to specialization patterns of Portuguese institutions. Higher Education, 63(3), 337–352.

van Vught, F. A., Kaiser, F., File, J. M., Gaethgens, C., Peter, R., & Westerheijden, D. (2010). U-Map. The European Classification of Higher Education Institutions, 1–46.

Wilkins, S. (2019). The positioning and competitive strategies of higher education institutions in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 139–153.

Published

2020-11-12

Issue

Section

Estudios