Can we ask motivation in the agreement to grant reprieve? Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court about motivation on reprieves (Judgment of 20 november 2013)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.34.2014.14068Keywords:
Reprieve, prerogative of mercy, motivation, reasons of justice, fairness and social utility, prohibition of arbitrariness, gracious act,Abstract
The judgment in question is a statement of great interest because it comes to changing the line of cases that held granting reprieve. The thing is that a Government´s partial reprieve was cancelled because it wasn´t not motivated. It is a very controversial decision. In fact, 19 of the 36 judges filed dissenting opinion, most of them referring to the issue of motivation. The controversy arises because the Act of Reprieve does not consider motivation as a mandatory element in the partial reprieves. It was mandatory until 1988, when it disappeared after the law reform. However, the Supreme Court based on the «spirit of the law»-reflected in the preamble and in Article 9.3 CE canceled the reprieve for not giving reasons of justice, equity or social utility for been granted.Downloads
Downloads
Published
2014-06-01
How to Cite
Serrano Maíllo, M. I. (2014). Can we ask motivation in the agreement to grant reprieve? Commentary on the Judgment of the Supreme Court about motivation on reprieves (Judgment of 20 november 2013). Teoría Y Realidad Constitucional, (34), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.34.2014.14068
Issue
Section
Tribunal Supremo
License
Las obras están bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional.
Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
- Se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra).
- No se usen para fines comerciales.
- Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.