The Aesthetics of OER, Deaf Pedagogy, and Curriculum Design Contra the “Wicked” Policy of Deaf Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.33083Palavras-chave:
deaf pedagogy, deaf curriculum, deaf multimodality, deaf aesthetics, language deprivation, open educational resourcesResumo
Designing inclusive education for deaf learners is a complex dilemma affecting multiple spheres and agents. In the US and Canada, despite considerable work by students, parents, educators, school administrators, curriculum developers, and lawmakers to address education policy about deaf bilingual literacy, the provision of deaf education through open access educational resources is a wicked problem exacerbated by gaps in curriculum and pedagogy. Despite increasingly hypermodern technologies and mandated early assessment, most deaf high schoolers in North America have unsatisfactory literacy skills (Qi & Mitchell, 2012). To better manage this “wicked problem,” involving policy, pedagogical methods, and curriculum design, we explore how aesthetic forms of knowledge and deaf positive design operations are used in conjunction with Open Educational Resources (OER). We reviewed the literature and constructed a novel framework about OER and e-books in deaf education. The synthesis generated three key takeaways that assisted our understanding of the complex issue. We presented our new framework alongside structured questions to 382 attendees hailing from 20 nations at the WUN/UNESCO Conference (2021, October), focused on inclusive and open access education technologies. We empirically analyzed this rich corpus using qualitative coding and represented our findings using a multipart Ecocycle Model. Following basic analysis, we describe four broader implications for deaf education research about teaching and curriculum using OER and e-book materials. Our analysis shows that deaf curriculum design is an educational problem embedded in a larger policy debate concerning methods and philosophies of pedagogy.
FULL ARTICLE:
https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/33083/25345
Downloads
Referências
Andrade, A., Ehlers, U.-D., Caine, A., Carneiro, R., Conole, G., Kairamo, A.-K., & Holmberg, C. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. Open Education Quality Initiative. https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/OPAL2011.pdf
Barton, K. C. (2015). Elicitation Techniques: Getting People to Talk About Ideas They Don’t Usually Talk About. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034392
Bauman, H.-D. L., & Murray, J. J. (Eds.). (2014). Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity. University of Minnesota Press.
Bills, A., Armstrong, D., & Howard, N. (2020). Scaled-up ‘safety-net’ schooling and the ‘wicked problem’ of educational exclusion in South Australia: problem or solution? Australian Educational Researcher, 47, p. 237-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00353-z
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003
Boukouras, K., & Kourbetis, V. (2014). Accessible Open Educational Resources for Students with Disabilities in Greece: They are Open to the Deaf. In C. Stephanidis & M. Antona (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge (Vol. 8514, pp. 349-357). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_32
Cawthon, S., & Garberoglio, C. L. (Eds.). (2017). Research in Deaf Education (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190455651.001.0001
Cheng, Q., Roth, A., Halgren, E., & Mayberry, R. I. (2019). Effects of Early Language Deprivation on Brain Connectivity: Language Pathways in Deaf Native and Late First-Language Learners of American Sign Language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00320
Cheng, S., Deng, M., & Yang, Y. (2020). Social Support and Student Engagement Among Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Students. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 152574012095063. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740120950638
Cherryholmes, C. (1999). Reading pragmatism. Teachers College Press.
Czubek, T. (2021). Crossing the Divide: The Bilingual Grammar Curriculum. In C. Enns, J. Henner, & L. McQuarrie (Eds.), Discussing bilingualism in deaf children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister (pp. 150-170). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808686-10-12
Di Perri, K. (2021). The Bedrock Literacy Curriculum. In C. Enns, J. Henner, & L. McQuarrie (Eds.), Discussing bilingualism in deaf children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister (pp. 132-149). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808686-9-11
Foster, S., & Kinuthia, W. (2003). Deaf persons of Asian American, Hispanic American, and African American backgrounds: A study of intraindividual diversity and identity. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(3), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng015
García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson & T. Skutnabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalising the local. Orient Blackswan, pp. 128-145.
Gulati, S. (2019). Language Deprivation Syndrome. In N. S. Glickman & W. C. Hall (Eds.), Language deprivation and deaf mental health. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Hall, M. L., Hall, W. C., & Caselli, N. K. (2019). Deaf children need language, not (just) speech. First Language, 39(4), 367-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719834102
Hall, M. L. (2020). The Input Matters: Assessing Cumulative Language Access in Deaf and Hard of Hearing Individuals and Populations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01407
Hamraie, A. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
Hecht, J. L. (2020). Responsibility in the Current Epidemic of Language Deprivation (1990–Present). Maternal and Child Health Journal, 24(11), 1319-1322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02989-1
Hladík, P., & Gůra, T. (2012). The Hybrid Book – One Document for All in the Latest Development. In K. Miesenberger, A. Karshmer, P. Penaz, & W. Zagler (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 18-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31522-0_3
Hockings, C., Brett, P., & Terentjevs, M. (2012). Making a difference—Inclusive learning and teaching in higher education through open educational resources. Distance Education, 33(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692066
Karipi, S., & Kourbetis, V. (2021). How can you talk about bilingual education of the deaf if you do not teach sign language as a first langauge? In C. Enns, J. Henner, & L. McQuarrie (Eds.), Discussing bilingualism in deaf children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister. 113-131. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808686-8-10
Kennon, J. L., & Patterson, M. H. (2016). What I didn’t know about teaching: Stressors and burnout among deaf education teachers. Journal of Human Services: Training, Research and Practice, 1(2).
Komesaroff, L. (2008). Disabling Pedagogy: Power, Politics, and Deaf Education. Gallaudet University Press.
Kourbetis, V., & Gelastopoulou, M. (2017). Using ICT to develop universally designed educational materials for students with disabilities. ICICTE 2017 Proceedings, 12-21.
Kourbetis, V., Boukouras, K., & Gelastopoulou, M. (2016). Multimodal Accessibility for Deaf Students Using Interactive Video, Digital Repository and Hybrid Books. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Users and Context Diversity (Vol. 9739, pp. 93-102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40238-3_10
Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kuntze, M., & Golos, D. (2021). Revisiting Literacy. In C. Enns, J. Henner, & L. McQuarrie (Eds.), Discussing bilingualism in deaf children: Essays in Honor of Robert Hoffmeister (pp. 99-112). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367808686-7-9
Kuntze, M., Golos, D., & Enns, C. (2014). Rethinking Literacy: Broadening Opportunities for Visual Learners. Sign Language Studies, 14(2), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2014.0002
Kusters, A., De Meulder, M., Friedner, M., & Emery, S. (2015). On ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’: Exploring paradigms for achieving Sign Language Peoples’ rights. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity. MMG Working paper, 15-02. https://www.mmg.mpg.de/61354/wp-15-02
Larson, J., & Marsh, J. (2005). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching. Sage.
Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (2013). The surprising power of liberating structures: Simple rules to unleash a culture of innovation (Black and white version). Liberating Structures Press.
McKeown, C., & McKeown, J. (2019). Accessibility in Online Courses: Understanding the Deaf Learner. TechTrends, 63(5), 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00385-3
Mohammed, N. (2021). Deaf students' linguistic access in online education: The case of Trinidad. Deafness & Education International, 23(3), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2021.1950989
O’Brien, D. (2017). Deaf-led Deaf Studies: Using Kaupapa Māori Principles to Guide the Development of Deaf Research Practices. In Innovations in Deaf Studies (Perspectives on Deafness) (pp. 57-76). Oxford University Press.
Qi, S., & Mitchell, R. E. (2012). Large-Scale Academic Achievement Testing of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enr028
Raike, A., Pylvanen, S., & Raino, P. (2014). Co-design from Divergent Thinking. In H.-D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity (pp. 402-420). University of Minnesota Press.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rogers, K. D., & Sutherland, H. (2014). The Hidden Gain: A New Lens of Research with d/Deaf Children and Adults. In H.-D. L. Bauman & J. J. Murray (Eds.), Deaf gain: Raising the stakes for human diversity (pp. 269-284).
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications.
Scott, J. A., & Henner, J. (2021). Second verse, same as the first: On the use of signing systems in modern interventions for deaf and hard of hearing children in the USA. Deafness & Education International, 23(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2020.1792071
Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (Second edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456
Skyer, M. E. (2021). Pupil—Pedagogue: Grounded Theories about Biosocial Interactions and Axiology for Deaf Educators [Unpublished dissertation].
Skyer, M., & Cochell, L. (2020). Aesthetics, Culture, Power Critical Deaf Pedagogy and ASL Video-publications as Resistance-to-Audism in Deaf Education and Research. Critical Education, 11(15), 1-25.
Snoddon, K., & Paul, J. J. (2020). Framing Sign Language as a Health Need in Canadian and International Policy. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 24(11), 1360-1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02974-8
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2. ed., [Nachdr.]). Sage Publ.
Sydelko, P., Midgley, G., & Espinosa, A. (2021). Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: Creating a common, cross-agency understanding. European Journal of Operational Research, 294(1), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.045
UNICEF. (n.d.). Accessible Digital Textbooks for All Initiative [Website]. UNICEF For Every Child. https://www.accessibletextbooksforall.org/accessible-digital-textbooks-all-initiative
United States Department of Justice. (n.d.). Information and Technical Assistance on the Americans with Disabilities Act. https://beta.ada.gov/
VL2 Labs (2021). About VL2. Visual Language and Visual Learning: An NSF Science of Learning Centre. https://vl2.gallaudet.edu/about
Weber, J., & Skyer, M. E. (2021, October 13). E-Book Creation—Current Considerations for Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) Students [Webinar]. Open and Inclusive Education: WUN and UNESCO Training and Research Networks. https://www.wununesco.world/keynote1-joanne?lang=en
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
