Dominancia y legitimidad: la retórica que usan los hombres en su discurso sobre su violencia hacia las mujeres
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v14i54-55.684Palabras clave:
ambigüedad, dominio, feminismo, género, marcadores, metáfora, metonimia, retórica, sinécdoque, violenciaResumen
El interés por las aplicaciones de la retórica a las cuestiones sociales está resurgiendo. Este artículo desarrolla un análisis retórico del discurso generado por hombres que han sido recientemente violentos hacia mujeres. Los textos se han sustraído de transcripciones de entrevistas con 14 hombres que habían empezado recientemente o estaban a punto de iniciar programas de detención de violencia. Cada entrevista de 90 minutos indagaba sobre la perspectiva de los hombres acerca de las mujeres, la violencia y las relaciones. Se identificaron una variedad de recursos retóricos en los textos y se analizaron sus efectos. Este artículo se centra en cinco de esos recursos: la ambigüedad de los referentes, los marcadores axiomáticos; la metáfora; la sinécdoque y la metonimia. Los efectos estratégicos de cada recurso son debatidos haciendo referencia a fragmentos de las transcripciones. El artículo explora cómo estos recursos retóricos proporcionan discursos de dominancia masculina y legitimidad al poder, y como éstos a su vez promueven a los hombres hacia la violencia a las mujeres. Se observa que el aumento de la sensibilidad a estos matices de la retórica mejora la comprensión de cómo los hombres justifican, camuflan y mantienen posiciones de dominio en sus relaciones con mujeres.
Descargas
Citas
Adams,P.(1992) “A Rhetoric of Mysticism” tesis PhD, University of Auckland, New Zeland.
Barthes, R. (1985) “Rhetoric of the image”, in R.Innis (ed) Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology. London: Hutchinson.
Bavelas, J.,Black, A., Chovil, N. & Mullet, J. (1990) Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Billig, M (1987) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. London: Cambrigde University Press.
Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.
Bograd, M. (1990) “Why We Need Gender to Understand Human Violence”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 5:132-5.
Bomajian,H. (1986) “ The Judiciary’s Use of Metaphors, Metonymies and Other Types of Tropes to Give First Amendment Protection to Students and Teachers”, Journal of Law and Education 15439-63.
Burke, K. (1969) A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Busch, R., Robertson,J & Lapsley, H. (1993) “Domestc Violence and the Justice System: A Study of Breaches of Pretection Orders”, Community Mental Health in New Zealand 7:26-44.
Dobash, R. And Dobash, R. (1988) “Research as Social Action: The Struggle for Battered Women”, in K Yllo and M. Bograd (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, pp.51-74. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Douglas, K (1994) Invisible Wounds. Auckland: Penguin.
Dubois, J., Edeline, F., Klinkengerg, J., Minguet, P., Pine, F & Trinon, H.(1981) A General
Rhetoric, trans. P. Burrel and E. Slotkin. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Eco, U. (1985) “ The Semantics of Metaphor”, in R.Innis (ed) Semiotics. London: Hutchinson.
Feyerabend, P. (1978) Against Method: Outline of and Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verson.
Gondolf, E.W. & Hanneken, J.(1987) “The Gender Warrior: Reformed Batterers on Abuse, Treatment and Change” Journal of Family Violence 2:177-91.
Gray,B. (1977) The Grammatical Foundations of Rhetorics: Discourse Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
Harré, R. (1985) “Situational Rhetoric and Self-representation”. In J. Forgas (ed) Language and Social Situations, pp. 175-86. New Yourk: Springer Verlag.
Kennedy, G.A. (1980) Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times, London: Chapel Hill
Kittay, E. (1987) Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kurz,D. (1989) “Social Science Perspectives on Wife Abuse: Current Debates and Future Directions”, Gender and Society 3:489-505.
Lakoff,G. (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Jhonson, M. (1979) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.
Leymore, V. (1975) Hidden Myth: Stucture And Symbolism in Advertising. London: Heinemann.
Mccloskey, D. (1985). The Rhetoric of Economics. University of Wisconsin: Harvester Press.
Murphy. J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1873). On Truth and Lying in an Extra-moral Sense, in Frederic Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language, trans. S.L. Gilamn, C. Blai & D.J. Parent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor: A Multidimensional Problem, in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. London: Cambridge University Press.
Pagelow, M. (1981). Woman-battering: Victims and their experiences. Newbury Park, CA.: SAGE
Papprotte. W. & Dirven, W. (Eds.). The ubiquity of Metaphor: Metaphor in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pence, E. & Paymar., M. (1993). Education Groups for Men who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.
Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of Rhetoric, trans. W. Kublac. Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rethoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do Men Batter their Wives?, in K. Yllo & M. Bograd (eds.). Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse. Newbury Park, CA.: SAGE
Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1978). The Rule of Metaphor: Multidisciplinary Studies in the Creation of Meaning in Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sandell, R. (1977). Linguistic Style and Persuasion. London: Academic Press.
Schechter, S. & Gary, L.T. (1988). A Framework for Understanding and Empowering Battered Women. In M. Straus (de.) Abuse and Victimization Across the Life Span, pp.240-253. Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities. London: SAGE
Soskice, J.M. (1985). Metaphor and Religious Language. Oxford: Clarendon.
Soyland, A. J. (1994). Psychology as Metaphor. London: SAGE
Vickers, B. (1988). In Defense of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon.
Walker, L.E. (1979). The Battered Women. New York: Harper and Row
