Plato on the Philosopher's Civic Oddness

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.39.2017.17094

Keywords:

Plato, Socrates, Aristophanes, Philosophy, astronomy, eros

Abstract

Philosophy is an historical product, which is definitively consolidated
with Plato and Aristotle. As it constitutes a novelty within the polis, it is not just regarded with suspicion from its very beginning, but it is also the target of severe criticism. Those who devote themselves to philosophy are stigmatized as odd people, as many classical texts show. Regarding his thinking and his practical proposal, the Academic gave continuity to the image of the philosopher as a crazy person. However, he did so in an ironic way. He suggested that the philosopher’s strangeness is not due to a real deviation from the behaviour that, by nature, is most suitable for humans, but the opposite, i.e. that it is caused by the wrong opinions of those who are not philosophers. In fact, apart from defining the nature of philosophy, one of the most urgent tasks that Plato has to deal with in his dialogues is making a defence of philosophy as the best way of life, depicting it as the most sensible and natural.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jonathan Lavilla de Lera, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU) & Eidos: Platonisme i Modernitat

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad de Barcelona y miembro del grupo de investigación Eidos: Platonisme i Modernitat. Obtuvo también en dicha universidad la Licenciatura en Filosofía, el Grado en Filología Clásica y el Máster en Filosofía y Estudios Clásicos. En la actualidad es proferor sustituto en la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU).

References

BONAZZI, Mauro (2010). I Sofisti. Roma: Carocci.

— (ed.) (2011). Platone. Fedro (trad. y ed. de M. Bonazzi). Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore.

BOYANCÉ, Pierre (1946). “Les Muses et l’harmonie des sphères”. En: Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Felix Grat. Vol. I. Paris: Pequeur-Grat.

BRISSON, Luc (ed.) (2004). Platon, Phèdre (trad., introducción y notas de L. Brisson). Paris: Flammarion.

CASSIN, Barbara. (1995). L’effet sophistique. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.

COOPER, John M. (1985), “The Independence of Oratory from Philosophy”. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy I, pp. 77- 96.

DOVER, Kenneth J. (1978), Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

FERRARI, Giovanni R. F. (1987). Listening to the Cicadas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HADOT, Pierre (2008). Elogio de Sócrates (trad. de A. Millán). Barcelona: Paidós.

KERÉNYI, Karl (2004). Eleusis. Imagen arquetípica de la madre y la hija (trad. de M. Tabuyo & A. López). Madrid: Siruela.

MARTINELLI TEMPESTA, Stefano (2003). “Sul significato di δεύτερος πλοῦς nel Fedone di Platone”. En BONAZZI, M & TRABATTONI, F. (eds.). Platone e la tradizione platonica. Milano: Cisalpino.

NAILS, Debra (2002). The people of Plato: a prosography of Plato and other Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

NIGHTINGALE, Andrea Wilson (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ROWE, Christopher. J. (ed.) (1988). Plato. Phaedrus (trad. y comentario de Ch. J. Rowe). 2ª edición. Warminser: Aris & Phillips.

SALA, Eva (2007). Il Fedro di Platone. Commento (Tesis doctoral). Padova: Università Degli Studi di Padova.

SOLANA DUESO, JOSÉ (2013). Más allá de la ciudad. El pensamiento político de Sócrates Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico.

THORNTON, Bruce S. (1997). Eros: the myth of ancient Greek sexuality. Boulder: Westview Press

TRABATTONI, Franco (ed.) (1995). Platone. Fedro (trad. de L. Untersteiner Candia; ed. de F. Trabattoni). Milano: Mondadori.

— (2001). “L’argomentazione platonica”, Problemata Vol. 1, pp. 7-38.

— (2012). “Myth and Truth in Plato’s Phaedrus”. En: COLLOBERT, C. & DESTRÉE, P. & GONZALEZ F. J. (eds.), Plato and Myth, Leiden: Brill.

TORDESILLAS, A. (2013). “Discours rhétoriques et conduite des âmes: dialectique, psychagogie, politique dans le «Phèdre» de Platon”. En: M. J. de Carvalho & A. Caeiro & H. Telo (eds.). In the Mirror of the Phaedrus. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.

VELARDI, Roberto (ed.) (2006). Platone. Fedro (trad., introducción y notas de R. Velardi). Milano: BUR.

DE VRIES, Gerrit Jacob (1969). A commentary on the Phaedrus of Plato, Amsterdam: Hakkert.

WASSON, R. Gordon & HOFMANN, Albert & RUCK, Carl A. P. (1978). El camino a Eleusis: una solución al enigma de los misterios (trad. de F. Garrido). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

WERNER, Daniel S. (2012). Myth and Philosophy in Plato's Phaedrus. Nueva York: Cambridge.

Published

2017-06-22

How to Cite

Lavilla de Lera, J. (2017). Plato on the Philosopher’s Civic Oddness. ENDOXA, (39), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.5944/endoxa.39.2017.17094

Issue

Section

Papers and Texts